Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

EK pilots 3 man MLE etc

Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

EK pilots 3 man MLE etc

Old 16th Mar 2015, 18:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: bahamas
Posts: 215
EK pilots 3 man MLE etc

Guys and Gals,

If you or the other pilots both do not get hours rest then the augment pilot does not count. You must write a discretion report, as a two man crew not in variation 1. When you go into discretion on a variation 1 flight the report goes straight to the authorities and it seems that the company was getting crap back. If you go into discretion under normal rules less than 2? hours it is internal. I am not sure how you start the trip legally in this manner, but remember, legally if you or the other guy has not got 3 hours its illegal to extend as per the 3 man crew. It is disrection and you must write a report. The company desperately is trying to prevent a lay over and if you just say you got 3 hours you are helping no one.
Fill out the report.
thatwasclose is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2015, 19:12
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Expat land
Posts: 179
Two pilots (never mind the 3rd) can NOT get 3 hours rest on the MLE flight. No seat change allowed while in climb or descent. Flight time around 3:40 - do the maths. And that's not even going into the "no burnout" approved on these for the augmenter.
So normal limits (NOT Annex 1) apply. Which invariably puts you into discretion when your roster is published, up to 40 days before you operate.

That is not what discretion is for, it's for disruptions after sign on.

I was caught out the first time, I won't be doing it next time!!
Avid Aviator is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2015, 03:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Duxbai
Posts: 117
Same issue with night Chennai. Impossible for one guy to get 3 hours on one sector. It is operated as a burnout but even so, both guys cannot get 3 hours.

Discretion report submitted but operating FO was desperate not to submit. He spent ages trawling the OM-A for excuses. But report was submitted!!!
flyinthesky is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2015, 05:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Up in the air
Posts: 547
Originally Posted by flyinthesky View Post
Same issue with night Chennai. Impossible for one guy to get 3 hours on one sector. It is operated as a burnout but even so, both guys cannot get 3 hours.

Discretion report submitted but operating FO was desperate not to submit. He spent ages trawling the OM-A for excuses. But report was submitted!!!
Company knows and uses the excuse "We think 3 pilots getting some rest (not counting the augmenting whom does not get any in-flight rest), is better than 2 pilots getting no rest at all"
lospilotos is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2015, 05:11
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sandpit
Posts: 116
The rest does not "need" to be consecutive. It's how they will get around it. So long as there is 6 hours somehow split between the two operating pilots then it's legal. (7.7.1.2)

The only defense will be if there is less than 6 hours of "cruise" time available between both sectors. And if that's the case I'm sure they will have no issue in just slowing the sectors down to meet the requirement.

The only way the third guy will get even close to 3 hours is to be on "rest" every single second they are on duty and not in an "operating" seat.

Have no fear... If you find a loophole somewhere they will just close it with an amendment
BobDole is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2015, 05:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Up in the air
Posts: 547
Well on MLE at least there is not 6 hours available as you also need to do breifings which should be completed before TOD. I would also like to draw the parallell to controlled rest where the resting pilot should not engage in any duties for 20 minutes after waking up.

Another thought, does the 3rd pilot need to be in the flight deck for takeoff and landing? OM-A says he should, if not resting. Since a First Class seat is reserved for rest, could the augmenting then be resting in the cabin during takeoff and landing?
lospilotos is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2015, 06:23
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sandpit
Posts: 116
The way I handle it is to put them on rest and stick them in the back for everything unless they are actively in an operating seat. Otherwise they will not get the required 3 hours to extend the duty (assuming 60 from boarding to TOC, 90 TOD to TOC, then 30 TOD to DXB).
Unless the pairing has been specifically listed as a "burnout" per vp-ops, everyone must get the 3 hours somehow.
BobDole is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2015, 07:04
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Doomadgee
Posts: 373
BOB- I assume Male is a "Burnout policy" flight.
I can only speak for the 330, where we do TRV 3 pilot, and there is a notam issued stating that it is to be burnout. I bought the issue of not getting the rest required due to changing seats etc, to manager regulatory affairs. His response was that on paper it is legal, and has been accepted by GCAA.

I guess it like our sign on is on paper 1 hour before push back and... well we all know how that goes.
Capn Rex Havoc is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2015, 11:35
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Africa
Posts: 107
Where does it state no seat change in climb and descend?
Since when do briefings need to be done before TOD?

Just curious!

Last edited by FuelFlow; 17th Mar 2015 at 11:55. Reason: Spelling
FuelFlow is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2015, 11:43
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DESDI or BUBIN
Posts: 379
Is there an actual part of the manual that says these things?
I was trying to find the section that states that crew cannot go on rest until 10,000ft and can only come up with the generalised section about critical phases of flight.
Eau de Boeing is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2015, 11:54
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: guess where
Posts: 374
OM-A 5.2.15.2 says, the captain can only be relieved by an ATPL holder above FL200 or below FL200 by another commander.
what_goes_up is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2015, 12:10
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Africa
Posts: 107
That is 100% correct, but still in the climb or descent!
OM A 8.3.10.1 gives you the answer for the F/O
FuelFlow is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2015, 12:15
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: bahamas
Posts: 215
Boeing CRC cannot be entered below 25,000
thatwasclose is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2015, 13:49
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 136
what goes up

yeah I deleted my post after seeing that. But it´s such a ballache should/shall..

thanks for the reference =)
Mach_Krit is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2015, 13:56
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: guess where
Posts: 374
Agree... And not saying it makes sense...
what_goes_up is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2015, 14:28
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: here and there, mostly there...
Posts: 333
Mle

During a ccp a few months ago sp said that the mle 3 man operation has nothing to do with extending duty times.

Its only in place to get the operating flightcrew doing an approach slightly less tired. So not necessary to do a 3 hrs rest for the operating crew.

What ever you think of it ofcourse.....

N.
natops is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2015, 14:37
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Knoteatingham
Posts: 829
I have been spared the MLE so far but it strikes me that the Rostering solution is simply to roster crew who have had 30+ hours rest after a BKK layover or similar so that they are unacclimatised and have a longer allowable FDP.

Happy to be corrected if I am wrong.
BANANASBANANAS is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2015, 15:15
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,632
EK pilots 3 man MLE etc

Bananas careful you'll get a job in crew planning
Mr Angry from Purley is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2015, 16:28
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Up there
Posts: 36
As stated earlier, rest does not need to be consecutive. So with a 1 hour 30 min turnaround, 20 mins could be taken on the ground in Male if necessary. It does not have to be sleep to count. Good pilots are problem solvers not problem makers.
Plane_Sailing is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2015, 16:48
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Knoteatingham
Posts: 829
Afraid not PS. You cant take 'in flight rest' on the ground. It becomes an attempt at Split duty - for which rest in the aeroplane is allowed. However,

Rest on the ground must be at least 3 hours consecutive, (90 minute turnround)

No pax on board (boarding commences STD-45)

Must be control of environment to allow for rest. (Cleaners, caterers, cabin crew checks etc, lights all on, noisy environment etc etc)

So I disagree that your 'solution' is in compliance with OMA and I will not be using it.
BANANASBANANAS is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.