Emirates Illuminati/Do not Fly EK Websites
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bymonek thanks for joining in with Harry. Like minds think alike!
I know you haven't experienced a great contract or work rules either but when I have 7 days leave assigned in a month I still fly 92 hours a month a very near the amount. Tell how I get paid for vacation? If I actually got paid for my vacation time I would get credit for those 7 days and "only" fly somewhere around 75 hours that month.
Same concept for sick time. When a Emirates pilot calls in sick the company assignees another trip in its place. If we had proper sick time we would get credit for that sick trip. Are you still with us Bymek and Harry?
Again what did I post that is not completely factual? Just because you don't agree with what I post or don't understand it doesn't make it false or negative.
Your comment about upgrades always being 3-4 years at Emirates is totally ignorant. A pilot joining today has to go through 3750 pilots before given an upgrade. Even with mass resignations it will take 6-8 years to upgrade if you join now.
I know you haven't experienced a great contract or work rules either but when I have 7 days leave assigned in a month I still fly 92 hours a month a very near the amount. Tell how I get paid for vacation? If I actually got paid for my vacation time I would get credit for those 7 days and "only" fly somewhere around 75 hours that month.
Same concept for sick time. When a Emirates pilot calls in sick the company assignees another trip in its place. If we had proper sick time we would get credit for that sick trip. Are you still with us Bymek and Harry?
Again what did I post that is not completely factual? Just because you don't agree with what I post or don't understand it doesn't make it false or negative.
Your comment about upgrades always being 3-4 years at Emirates is totally ignorant. A pilot joining today has to go through 3750 pilots before given an upgrade. Even with mass resignations it will take 6-8 years to upgrade if you join now.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Post-Pit and Lovin' It.
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
harry,
I am thankfully, no longer in need of having to ignore anything to do with EK. So your shot is wasted.
I just found it interesting that your approach to the minor things you listed, is to ignore them. Very passive, very submissive. Guess the shrink was wrong, not all pilots are Type A's after all. I hope you don't apply the ignore/deny concept to problems in an aircraft, it probably won't end well.
Still, I'm sure it was very hard for you to so much as even mention anything negative about your beloved Emirates - the airline that gave you the money you could never achieve in your home country. But you're really grasping to try and compare working for a US major to working for EK based solely on pay - whether your "maths" are accurate or not.
I am thankfully, no longer in need of having to ignore anything to do with EK. So your shot is wasted.
I just found it interesting that your approach to the minor things you listed, is to ignore them. Very passive, very submissive. Guess the shrink was wrong, not all pilots are Type A's after all. I hope you don't apply the ignore/deny concept to problems in an aircraft, it probably won't end well.
Still, I'm sure it was very hard for you to so much as even mention anything negative about your beloved Emirates - the airline that gave you the money you could never achieve in your home country. But you're really grasping to try and compare working for a US major to working for EK based solely on pay - whether your "maths" are accurate or not.
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rob the poor to pay the rich
Capt Leaz
If I may add my tuppence worth:
Don’t give much credibility to those who enter into slanging matches with the other posters and divert the discussion at hand. Either they are too immature to have a sensible discussion without lowering the tone and resorting to cheap jibes or they are company trolls deliberately sowing discord to derail the discussion. Whatever the case, I think it’s reasonable to assume there is no value in their opinion. I ignore posts by these individuals.
On the issue itself:
I have been here over 20 years and watched many deliberate whether to come, or to stay or to leave. Many base the decision on well researched facts which are current at the time. However I note that often very little consideration is given to the trend or direction of this data, which might be reasonably extrapolated to see how happy they would be a few years down the line.
Fact: For 20 years, any increase in salary has always been below the UAE government stipulated inflation statistics. Ergo the salary has declined in real terms.
Fact: Conversely the hour expectation for the salary has increased over the 20 years. Without complex specifics this has happened in a number of creative, but very real adjustments.
Fact: Despite an empathetic history, the company handling of a multitude individual issues has become far more cavalier and brutal. So much so that a recent online survey asked employees what they felt about the job as rumblings were being felt. The yet to be published outcome cannot have been pretty. This issue of employee treatment in various departments has led to the emergence of websites from some who feel they have been aggrieved. There are in fact many more shocking stories of individual treatment. To be fair, there are some stories of well handled issues but they are certainly more the exception now. I think the variability itself is unsettling for many. The Sword of Damocles hangs over us all.
Fact: There are moves afoot to corral all pilots into a few large complexes to ultimately remove the pilot transport burden and eventually accommodation allowances. Look ahead to regular busses to work and no choice of accommodation unless you foot the majority or all of the cost yourself. Visualise council estate living and surveillance.
Currently there is reliable information coming out that there will shortly be another adjustment to ensure we work more hours and have less days off in the near future. This increase will come through a mixture of regulatory change and company policy adjustment through creative interpretation of the regulations. No one is likely to successfully challenge this, least of all the regulator. It may go hand in hand with a marginal salary increase to soften the blow but be assured this will be eroded quickly by cost of living as the company plays a careful long game of seemingly innocuous continual adjustment that you will simply not have the time to keep in focus. They are certainly not fools. The consequences however are sorely felt over time. It’s the frog in the boiling pot story. It will not that easy to decide when to leap out. Like the frog many simply stay but are very uncomfortable. Ask yourself if you want to live knowing that things will get worse.
My advice: At the very least wait for the May salary review, bearing in mind that this may be inexplicably delayed and then backdated in part. There will be a sting in the tail if it does not come before. Do your deliberations and assessment but ensure you discount some of your assumptions because there is a simple mandate here: “Each year costs must be cut – profits must rise or managers get replaced”.
You will bear the impact. Much of the profits are paid by the employees.
If I may add my tuppence worth:
Don’t give much credibility to those who enter into slanging matches with the other posters and divert the discussion at hand. Either they are too immature to have a sensible discussion without lowering the tone and resorting to cheap jibes or they are company trolls deliberately sowing discord to derail the discussion. Whatever the case, I think it’s reasonable to assume there is no value in their opinion. I ignore posts by these individuals.
On the issue itself:
I have been here over 20 years and watched many deliberate whether to come, or to stay or to leave. Many base the decision on well researched facts which are current at the time. However I note that often very little consideration is given to the trend or direction of this data, which might be reasonably extrapolated to see how happy they would be a few years down the line.
Fact: For 20 years, any increase in salary has always been below the UAE government stipulated inflation statistics. Ergo the salary has declined in real terms.
Fact: Conversely the hour expectation for the salary has increased over the 20 years. Without complex specifics this has happened in a number of creative, but very real adjustments.
Fact: Despite an empathetic history, the company handling of a multitude individual issues has become far more cavalier and brutal. So much so that a recent online survey asked employees what they felt about the job as rumblings were being felt. The yet to be published outcome cannot have been pretty. This issue of employee treatment in various departments has led to the emergence of websites from some who feel they have been aggrieved. There are in fact many more shocking stories of individual treatment. To be fair, there are some stories of well handled issues but they are certainly more the exception now. I think the variability itself is unsettling for many. The Sword of Damocles hangs over us all.
Fact: There are moves afoot to corral all pilots into a few large complexes to ultimately remove the pilot transport burden and eventually accommodation allowances. Look ahead to regular busses to work and no choice of accommodation unless you foot the majority or all of the cost yourself. Visualise council estate living and surveillance.
Currently there is reliable information coming out that there will shortly be another adjustment to ensure we work more hours and have less days off in the near future. This increase will come through a mixture of regulatory change and company policy adjustment through creative interpretation of the regulations. No one is likely to successfully challenge this, least of all the regulator. It may go hand in hand with a marginal salary increase to soften the blow but be assured this will be eroded quickly by cost of living as the company plays a careful long game of seemingly innocuous continual adjustment that you will simply not have the time to keep in focus. They are certainly not fools. The consequences however are sorely felt over time. It’s the frog in the boiling pot story. It will not that easy to decide when to leap out. Like the frog many simply stay but are very uncomfortable. Ask yourself if you want to live knowing that things will get worse.
My advice: At the very least wait for the May salary review, bearing in mind that this may be inexplicably delayed and then backdated in part. There will be a sting in the tail if it does not come before. Do your deliberations and assessment but ensure you discount some of your assumptions because there is a simple mandate here: “Each year costs must be cut – profits must rise or managers get replaced”.
You will bear the impact. Much of the profits are paid by the employees.
short flights long nights
Excellent post Pixy. And very true.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Come now, leave poor Harry and his like alone. He really thinks this is a good airline and no matter how many times you tell him or what proof you lay out before him he thinks he hit the lottery. But be careful laying out that proof to the likes of Harry you be labeled and called negative. Wow, what a put down.
It is better than that crap airline he worked at before though.
That was really desperate Harry comparing us to Delta. What a severe case of Dillusion you must suffer from! How many Delta pilots are trying to come to Emirates vs how many Emirates pilots are trying to go to Delta? It must be 200 to 1. Delta 777 FOs only make $185 an hour and that is before all the work rules come into play and 75 hours vs 92 hours. Almost 20% less hours and he makes more than me before taxes.
Great post Whose sorry. I wish I was that clever but I'm just an Emirates pilot.
It is better than that crap airline he worked at before though.
That was really desperate Harry comparing us to Delta. What a severe case of Dillusion you must suffer from! How many Delta pilots are trying to come to Emirates vs how many Emirates pilots are trying to go to Delta? It must be 200 to 1. Delta 777 FOs only make $185 an hour and that is before all the work rules come into play and 75 hours vs 92 hours. Almost 20% less hours and he makes more than me before taxes.
Great post Whose sorry. I wish I was that clever but I'm just an Emirates pilot.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Spot on Pixy...PARTICULARLY the point about the back and forth sniping between the posters
I'm not going to take sides in the Harry v AC handbags...
...but re. Delta my good friend got paid $202,000 last year as a seven year FO on the MD88, just awarded Capt MD NYC. He juggled things around and 'green slipped' and would be at the high end of the creative opportunists...ie he has a choice to work hard or not.
The work rules he enjoys are saliva inducing reading....comparing Delta Capt to an EK capt is not realistic BUT it took an awfully long time for the T7 skipper at Big D to get there...so not really apples to apples.
Most of us (at least my close social network) know what we are faced with here ..hard graft & zero appreciation/improvement in T&Cs until kids go to college then head for a commuting contract somewhere else.
What's unsettling to me most though is - throughout the course of time Karma seems to work itself into most equations, the longer one waits the harder the fall.
My own view is that it will be a fatigue related incident and accident...obviously there will be no schadenfreude with such a terrible event but there will be a collective scream of:
"We freakin told you so!"
They are pushing too hard, rarely does it lead to a happy ending.
f.
I'm not going to take sides in the Harry v AC handbags...
...but re. Delta my good friend got paid $202,000 last year as a seven year FO on the MD88, just awarded Capt MD NYC. He juggled things around and 'green slipped' and would be at the high end of the creative opportunists...ie he has a choice to work hard or not.
The work rules he enjoys are saliva inducing reading....comparing Delta Capt to an EK capt is not realistic BUT it took an awfully long time for the T7 skipper at Big D to get there...so not really apples to apples.
Most of us (at least my close social network) know what we are faced with here ..hard graft & zero appreciation/improvement in T&Cs until kids go to college then head for a commuting contract somewhere else.
What's unsettling to me most though is - throughout the course of time Karma seems to work itself into most equations, the longer one waits the harder the fall.
My own view is that it will be a fatigue related incident and accident...obviously there will be no schadenfreude with such a terrible event but there will be a collective scream of:
"We freakin told you so!"
They are pushing too hard, rarely does it lead to a happy ending.
f.
Last edited by fliion; 30th Jan 2015 at 06:19.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: >FL310
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maximum limits are the "goal/target". Sort of like the edge of the safety margin. Ok, as long as the operation is within the margin. But no buffer, no leeway, no room for error, etc. Are the Safety reports indicators of how close to the margin the operation is? Read between the lines of some of the reports. There is always the human factor involved.
The public relations, marketing of this airline does not indicate it is a low cost operation. First class all the way, right? But the way employees are paid, treated, respected and appreciated, proves this airline treats its employees as bad as some bottom feeder LCCs. Five years ago, cabin crew were not quitting in the hundreds weekly. What has changed? Instead of reading the tea leaves, they're just throwing gas on the fire. Good leadership and management.
The public relations, marketing of this airline does not indicate it is a low cost operation. First class all the way, right? But the way employees are paid, treated, respected and appreciated, proves this airline treats its employees as bad as some bottom feeder LCCs. Five years ago, cabin crew were not quitting in the hundreds weekly. What has changed? Instead of reading the tea leaves, they're just throwing gas on the fire. Good leadership and management.
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've been following this forum for awhile now. As a passenger and aviation enthusiast, and a relatively big fan of the Emirates product...it's really disturbing to read that some of the pilots here for EK predict an incident/accident to happen and an "told you so!" Very comforting @fliion Some even appear to hope for one soon just so they can say "told you so!" and hope for a change.
While it's unfortunate that many of you face difficult situations, please do realize that that there are passengers that fly your aircraft and trust you 110% to get you from point A to point B safely. Even if we may not be completely aware of how the conditions of flying are, we still trust you. I wish there were some more positive comments about people enjoying their jobs, but I suppose it's easier to complain about the negative things than to point out any positives. Sometimes reading the comments on here...it really makes you think a little bit before getting on an EK flight, or really any flight for that matter.
While it's unfortunate that many of you face difficult situations, please do realize that that there are passengers that fly your aircraft and trust you 110% to get you from point A to point B safely. Even if we may not be completely aware of how the conditions of flying are, we still trust you. I wish there were some more positive comments about people enjoying their jobs, but I suppose it's easier to complain about the negative things than to point out any positives. Sometimes reading the comments on here...it really makes you think a little bit before getting on an EK flight, or really any flight for that matter.
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: earth
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While it's unfortunate that many of you face difficult situations, please do realize that that there are passengers that fly your aircraft and trust you 110% to get you from point A to point B safely. Even if we may not be completely aware of how the conditions of flying are, we still trust you. I wish there were some more positive comments about people enjoying their jobs, but I suppose it's easier to complain about the negative things than to point out any positives. Sometimes reading the comments on here...it really makes you think a little bit before getting on an EK flight, or really any flight for that matter.
I would also like to only hear nice comments about the stock market and the situation in Syria or Ukraine.
It is a human trait that complainers and lobbyists are louder than the numb majority. You have to filter out reality, in the press, tv and on forums.
It is just as much a human trait that we expect the best of doctors, pilots and police when they protect us, but don't want to hear anything that may trouble the glassy waters when not involved.
Where there's smoke, there's fire and i am happy that there is some doubt in you boarding an EK flight or any other, because the industry is sick. Instead of asking the frontmen to no longer feed you with the bitter reality, you might ask the managers to remedy the situation.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stylo
To insinuate that through a post there was a "hope for" factor in an accident when if you read said sentence again - it says nothing of the sort - is irresponsible.
It's difficult to talk to a layman in context about what we we deal with. It's not like shift work where you do "nights" this month, days the next. We are talking about interrupting natural sleep patterns sometimes four time a week. So if I told you that you had to stay awake through the night four time this week and then do your job to a very specific standard - it takes on a different flavor.
The issue is not that we can't do it within industry prescribed regs - the issue is that our regs differ so significantly with those in the the US and elsewhere because of greed. Maybe just maybe your post will be a small building block in a movement that will wake mgt up and realize - okay enough is enough.
For a "civvie" maybe Have a look at Discovery Channels Air Crash Investigation on Pilot Fatigue and specifically sleep inertia. Three accidents covered - Colgan (Buffalo), Air India Express (Mangalore) & Corporate Air (Kirskville). The rules changed in the US after Colgan - NOT for foreign airlines flying to US.
Asiana had four pilots on board for a 10:15 flight from ICN to SFO - in certain circumstances we could do it with two and no more than three.
We care deeply about people in the back and it is precisely FOR that reason that I made my comments in previous post.
Fatigue is real and needs to be taken seriously - you agree, I agree - we just need the third party.
f.
To insinuate that through a post there was a "hope for" factor in an accident when if you read said sentence again - it says nothing of the sort - is irresponsible.
It's difficult to talk to a layman in context about what we we deal with. It's not like shift work where you do "nights" this month, days the next. We are talking about interrupting natural sleep patterns sometimes four time a week. So if I told you that you had to stay awake through the night four time this week and then do your job to a very specific standard - it takes on a different flavor.
The issue is not that we can't do it within industry prescribed regs - the issue is that our regs differ so significantly with those in the the US and elsewhere because of greed. Maybe just maybe your post will be a small building block in a movement that will wake mgt up and realize - okay enough is enough.
For a "civvie" maybe Have a look at Discovery Channels Air Crash Investigation on Pilot Fatigue and specifically sleep inertia. Three accidents covered - Colgan (Buffalo), Air India Express (Mangalore) & Corporate Air (Kirskville). The rules changed in the US after Colgan - NOT for foreign airlines flying to US.
Asiana had four pilots on board for a 10:15 flight from ICN to SFO - in certain circumstances we could do it with two and no more than three.
We care deeply about people in the back and it is precisely FOR that reason that I made my comments in previous post.
Fatigue is real and needs to be taken seriously - you agree, I agree - we just need the third party.
f.
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Within
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi, stylo.
I've been given some input on safety culture on EK flights from many cabin crew (writing the blog on EK really gives you the full picture of what is going on inside EK as many employees write to me, so I can compare their stories and opinions). Interesting enough, while I got some hate comments on my blog, I never got a hate email, only emails of support and gratitude.
I will post article on safety subject these days and I will include your concerns.
Before that, would you care to elaborate what exactly in Emirates product are you a fan of? Planes, food, ICE, service? Any product of EK includes people who deliver it (that is what customer service industry is all about). Saying that you are fan of EK products but not trusting them confuses me.
This is what you have said 4 years ago about your safety concerns:
You have the same safety concern for at least 4 years now. Can you, please, explain in what way you separate EK product from its people?
I am asking because EK management is doing the same thing so I would like to understand that way of thinking better. Managers don't seem to care about the connection between "the product" and the employees. So they change staff and treat them like disposable and easily replaceable things, while expecting "the product" to stay on a high level of quality. It doesn't have any sense or logic to me and I don't understand how can anyone be a fan of something they don't trust to?
In most of the cases, people are Emirates' product and that includes pilots and their skills to fly the planes safely. Safety is one of the products of every airline and it's not separable from people working in them.
So, if you feel that safety is low, that is because some pilots are frustrated with working conditions. If they are frustrated, it means that management is not doing their job well. But you have decided to keep the product picture that management is offering to you and to be the fan of it and to criticize people for being frustrated? You are accusing mistreated and exhausted pilots for ruining your good impression on Emirates? Am I mistaken?
Since I plan to write an article on all of this, I would really appreciate your answer to my questions. Maybe not on this thread, but certainly on "EK safety culture" thread, where your second quoted statement originates from.
Thank you.
I've been following this forum for awhile now. As a passenger and aviation enthusiast, and a relatively big fan of the Emirates product
I've been given some input on safety culture on EK flights from many cabin crew (writing the blog on EK really gives you the full picture of what is going on inside EK as many employees write to me, so I can compare their stories and opinions). Interesting enough, while I got some hate comments on my blog, I never got a hate email, only emails of support and gratitude.
I will post article on safety subject these days and I will include your concerns.
Before that, would you care to elaborate what exactly in Emirates product are you a fan of? Planes, food, ICE, service? Any product of EK includes people who deliver it (that is what customer service industry is all about). Saying that you are fan of EK products but not trusting them confuses me.
This is what you have said 4 years ago about your safety concerns:
you how much I do not enjoy reading how some pilots on here are basically guaranteeing an accident happening soon. I understand the airline having problems, and how things are done differently in the ME...but to say that the airline is bracing for a hull loss soon, doesn't give me much confidence in the boys flying the thing up front. Sad.
I am asking because EK management is doing the same thing so I would like to understand that way of thinking better. Managers don't seem to care about the connection between "the product" and the employees. So they change staff and treat them like disposable and easily replaceable things, while expecting "the product" to stay on a high level of quality. It doesn't have any sense or logic to me and I don't understand how can anyone be a fan of something they don't trust to?
In most of the cases, people are Emirates' product and that includes pilots and their skills to fly the planes safely. Safety is one of the products of every airline and it's not separable from people working in them.
So, if you feel that safety is low, that is because some pilots are frustrated with working conditions. If they are frustrated, it means that management is not doing their job well. But you have decided to keep the product picture that management is offering to you and to be the fan of it and to criticize people for being frustrated? You are accusing mistreated and exhausted pilots for ruining your good impression on Emirates? Am I mistaken?
Since I plan to write an article on all of this, I would really appreciate your answer to my questions. Maybe not on this thread, but certainly on "EK safety culture" thread, where your second quoted statement originates from.
Thank you.
Last edited by Nikita81; 31st Jan 2015 at 07:25.
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Dubai
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stylo be careful putting faith in some of the backpedals and perceived motivations here.
It would be only a tiny number of warped individuals who hope for a catastrophe (no doubt on someone else's flight) in order to "hit back" at the company and one poster's shadenfreudenistic comment about having "told them so" is NOT representative of the professionals you want flying you around. Most of us set a positive atmosphere in the F/D and do not accept this kind of crap while on duty. Moan in the bar instead.
There is no labour representation here so for the vast professional majority, posting on this site is on way of letting off steam and expressing outlooks. As you have seen, some take it way too far and way too seriously but they are not speaking for anyone but themselves.
Despite that, almost everyone I know still loves the job despite the company's way of handling crew and staff and wish the best for the hand that feeds us.
PS: Good work, Nikita!
It would be only a tiny number of warped individuals who hope for a catastrophe (no doubt on someone else's flight) in order to "hit back" at the company and one poster's shadenfreudenistic comment about having "told them so" is NOT representative of the professionals you want flying you around. Most of us set a positive atmosphere in the F/D and do not accept this kind of crap while on duty. Moan in the bar instead.
There is no labour representation here so for the vast professional majority, posting on this site is on way of letting off steam and expressing outlooks. As you have seen, some take it way too far and way too seriously but they are not speaking for anyone but themselves.
Despite that, almost everyone I know still loves the job despite the company's way of handling crew and staff and wish the best for the hand that feeds us.
PS: Good work, Nikita!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It seems Stylo is not the only one who cannot read. Capitalized for those challenged:
"My own view is that it will be a fatigue related incident and accident...obviously there will be NO schadenfreude with such a TERRIBLE event but there will be a collective scream of:..."
f.
"My own view is that it will be a fatigue related incident and accident...obviously there will be NO schadenfreude with such a TERRIBLE event but there will be a collective scream of:..."
f.
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Within
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with you, fliion.
There is no mention of any wish for accident to happen. You just have a grounded fear that it can happen.
Unfortunately, most of the human population prefer to cure the symptoms and not the cause of the disease.
There is no mention of any wish for accident to happen. You just have a grounded fear that it can happen.
Unfortunately, most of the human population prefer to cure the symptoms and not the cause of the disease.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Post-Pit and Lovin' It.
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
stylo,
I challenge you to provide anywhere on this thread an example of a comment that could be twisted to be taken as a desire for a hull loss! No one in their one right minds would wish for that. Been through one at a former airline and I can't imagine wishing it on my worst enemy, or even TCAS.
The problem with safety is you can't prove a negative. This can be illustrated by a statement such as "Emirates has not had a major accident, therefore they are safe." (Well, ok, even the statement is debatable, seeing as something like MEL - to mention one - wasn't a hull loss. Only as close as you can get without one. But we'll take the "no major accident" as technically correct.)
But the thing is - as the brokers like to say - past performance is no guarantee of future results. The fact that Emirates has not had a smoking hole in the past does not prove their best practices in safety in the present. And so the best we can do is try and manage the risk.
But therein lies the problem with treating all limitations as targets instead of limits. Perhaps someone can provide some examples of situations where pushing things - people or machines - to the absolute limit, had a happy ending?
Hence the people who try and reduce the chances of such a horror as you allude to are feeling a bit darker at EK these days. No regulatory oversight, no labour protection, massive rosters, no roster stability, Air Safety Reports, Fatigue Reports that fall on deaf ears, no way to inject some balance into the equation, no way to fight back other than resign, and after awhile no energy to even fight anyway. It's hard to win a rigged game, after all.
But I can assure you, stylo, that the good folk at the front end will surely do their best for you and all other pax, right until they just can't anymore.
I challenge you to provide anywhere on this thread an example of a comment that could be twisted to be taken as a desire for a hull loss! No one in their one right minds would wish for that. Been through one at a former airline and I can't imagine wishing it on my worst enemy, or even TCAS.
The problem with safety is you can't prove a negative. This can be illustrated by a statement such as "Emirates has not had a major accident, therefore they are safe." (Well, ok, even the statement is debatable, seeing as something like MEL - to mention one - wasn't a hull loss. Only as close as you can get without one. But we'll take the "no major accident" as technically correct.)
But the thing is - as the brokers like to say - past performance is no guarantee of future results. The fact that Emirates has not had a smoking hole in the past does not prove their best practices in safety in the present. And so the best we can do is try and manage the risk.
But therein lies the problem with treating all limitations as targets instead of limits. Perhaps someone can provide some examples of situations where pushing things - people or machines - to the absolute limit, had a happy ending?
Hence the people who try and reduce the chances of such a horror as you allude to are feeling a bit darker at EK these days. No regulatory oversight, no labour protection, massive rosters, no roster stability, Air Safety Reports, Fatigue Reports that fall on deaf ears, no way to inject some balance into the equation, no way to fight back other than resign, and after awhile no energy to even fight anyway. It's hard to win a rigged game, after all.
But I can assure you, stylo, that the good folk at the front end will surely do their best for you and all other pax, right until they just can't anymore.