Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

The Announcement May 9th

Wikiposts
Search
Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

The Announcement May 9th

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th May 2013, 09:12
  #161 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: a very sandy place
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I want to make it very clear that I am not advocating uploading extra fuel or doing anything of the sort. I am not telling the cabin crew to go and hand out everything on board. I am not telling the ground staff to drag their feet.

My post was simply meant to express my opinion, as a pilot and a person that knows about business, that a pissed off employee group that stays in the work force is far far more costly to any large corporation (especially an airline) than the training costs of the ones that quit.
a747jb is offline  
Old 12th May 2013, 09:15
  #162 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: dubai
Age: 53
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
I've not done the Harare triangle trip, but when did the burnout policy disappear and what has it been replaced with?

Do the operating crew not still need their 3 hours minimum rest?
Sorry, I have written this:
Quote: eg the last recall made by the GCAA authoritiy to EK! Credit flying times

and then I meant (I was not clear) that the "Burn out policy is totally illegal", this one has not been (yet) recall by the GCAA.

The burn out policy does exist in the OM-A, but doesn't not in the GCAA text, this is something totally contradictory with the OFFICIAL FDP definition by itself.

One more time, EK does whatever it likes! until the GCAA starts showing it is an authority...
flywildcamel is offline  
Old 12th May 2013, 10:47
  #163 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: In someone pocket
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even monkeys know when they get cheated....

jetjockey696 is offline  
Old 12th May 2013, 10:59
  #164 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sandy beach
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even the media have caught on to the obvious injustice and lack of goodwill...


Emirates defends no staff bonus, despite huge profit - ArabianBusiness.com

Last edited by Saltaire; 12th May 2013 at 11:00.
Saltaire is offline  
Old 12th May 2013, 11:53
  #165 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: In the desert
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What I don't understand is people thinking it is OK not to get the profit share again this year by saying this is the best package around, we should be pleased to have a job..... Read the previous online article: that's exactly what the management say and want us to think!

Why do they settle for second best?

My previous company was meant to be worse....I am starting to wonder if, in fact, it was not better....


PS: Adolf, the best post ever!

Last edited by Desert Camel; 12th May 2013 at 14:10. Reason: Profit Share, not bonus!
Desert Camel is offline  
Old 12th May 2013, 12:24
  #166 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: In Fresh Air
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gents, Let's get this definition straight. We do not get a bonus, for once and for all, we get a PROFIT SHARE. Those on the palace get bonuses, whether a profit is made or not. What we call it does make a difference in the mindset. WE made a profit, but do not get to share. Those who "manage" us get bonuses for increasing our workload and continually eroding our total "package". Lower costs in your department and you will get a BONUS. the only incentive for us to go above and beyond is the possibility of a SHARE of the rewards. We will never get a BONUS.

Think about the PR as above. A bonus is one thing, not sharing in a 52% profit increase is a whole 'nother animal. Call it as such. There is nothing in our contracts that refer to a bonus.
Panther 88 is offline  
Old 12th May 2013, 13:16
  #167 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai - sand land.
Age: 55
Posts: 2,831
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Watching the Spanish Grand Prix. I can see where the PS went
White Knight is offline  
Old 12th May 2013, 13:45
  #168 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WK
Talking of the Spanish GP, just over 18 years ago I was in a bar in Bahrain and Rothmans were there promoting the upcoming GP in Spain and had a competion for a 3 day trip to the GP all expenses paid from LHR to be wined and dined by them and a pass to the GP where Damon Hill and Coulthard would meet us and I won it and was on the grid just before the start to boot. ( Perhaps you saw me on the telly if nanny was not changing your nappy at the time??)

Corrected for spelling of Damon Ooops

Last edited by millerscourt; 14th May 2013 at 08:42.
millerscourt is offline  
Old 12th May 2013, 15:13
  #169 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai - sand land.
Age: 55
Posts: 2,831
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by millerscourt
just over 18 years ago I was in a bar in Bahrain
That's some nanny to wipe my vitals whilst I was in a bar in Alderney ;-)

Last edited by White Knight; 12th May 2013 at 15:15.
White Knight is offline  
Old 12th May 2013, 15:14
  #170 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And where are Rothmans now?

Telling.

f.
fliion is offline  
Old 12th May 2013, 15:14
  #171 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai - sand land.
Age: 55
Posts: 2,831
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Besides MC; how much did you pay to win that little GF competition
White Knight is offline  
Old 12th May 2013, 15:59
  #172 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WK

Do keep up! It was a Rothmans competition not a GF one as they were sponsors of the Williams team.

Not being a smoker I assume Rothmans are still made but because tobacco companies are persona non grata these days most GP's went overseas.
millerscourt is offline  
Old 12th May 2013, 16:01
  #173 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai - sand land.
Age: 55
Posts: 2,831
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by givemewings
I for one will be putting my foot down as regards the giving away of crew food to pax who obviously could not be bothered to order their own veg meals.... no more. If they don't order, that's their problem. Crew should not go without (happens on majority of flights these days) watch that change. And crew are within their rights to say, wait, that's my food, sorry no you cannot give it to mr want-3-meals....
Once upon a time a CSD (purser) gave my crew food away to a pax. She positioned back to LGW at my behest and was subsequently demoted by the company!
If she'd asked I would have said 'go ahead'
White Knight is offline  
Old 12th May 2013, 18:32
  #174 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WK

Positioned back to LGW all the way from BHX no doubt. Were they really still called a CSD in those wee franchised pretend BA Airlines
millerscourt is offline  
Old 13th May 2013, 03:00
  #175 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UAE
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The number was a big one, but for an operation the size of Emirates it looks like a poor performance.
Hansol is offline  
Old 13th May 2013, 06:38
  #176 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: guess where
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The number was a big one, but for an operation the size of Emirates it looks like a poor performance.
This is poor performance indeed. With a trading profit margin of only 4%, whereas it should be 7 to 8% to (self) sustain such a growth, there is not much meat on the bone... There will be a lot of (expensive) external fund raising needed to keep the ship floating.

In the real world the management would have a hard time to explain such a performance to the stake holders and would, most probably, be replaced for under performing badly.

Once again shiny figures but if you dig a bit deeper, it doesn't look too good.

Last edited by what_goes_up; 13th May 2013 at 06:39.
what_goes_up is offline  
Old 13th May 2013, 06:40
  #177 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Really, name & profit of a comparable carrier that had an acceptable performance.

EY, QR, FZ. Did better than us?. They got a bonus.

f.

Last edited by fliion; 13th May 2013 at 06:42.
fliion is offline  
Old 13th May 2013, 06:52
  #178 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: guess where
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fliion
Did I say we shouldn't get a PS? I was merely stating the fact that our esteemed management did a $hite job...
what_goes_up is offline  
Old 13th May 2013, 08:46
  #179 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 31-43,000 feet ALL the friggin' time!
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Be prepared

"Therefore, staff, whom we know continue to work very hard, will not receive a bonus on this occasion. They will, however, continue to enjoy the generous benefits package offered to all staff of the Emirates Group."

That's office talk for "they will never do the bonus again". Get used to it.
jeff748 is offline  
Old 13th May 2013, 11:33
  #180 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WGU

If one were to believe the integrity of the numbers - then I agree.

...and there in lies the rub

f.
fliion is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.