Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

flydubai Kandahar day out

Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

flydubai Kandahar day out

Old 8th Jul 2011, 09:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 752
Received 19 Likes on 6 Posts
flydubai Kandahar day out

Apparently flydubai are arranging charters to Kandahar - hq for Terry Taliban and extremely dangerous. This latest bombshell ( pun intended) has been announced by notice from the much discredited and Walter Mittyesque safety 'manager'. The notice would be a candidate for a comedy award if the subject was not so serious. Highlights of the notice include guidance on - I kid you not - what to do in the event of a rocket attack. Apparently lie down and cover your ears is the best advice. I am reminded of the famous Blackadder sketch when Baldrick asks Blackadder for guidance when stepping upon a mine: " Well, Baldrick, traditionally one hurls oneself 200 feet into the air and scatters four limbs in all directions..." Other gems include the fact that rocket attacks are designed to harass and are not really serious!

Further proof, if proof were needed that there is no, or limited safety culture within flydubai if the personal safety of the crews is treated in such a cavalier fashion. You can be assured that any 'safety assessment' will be a whitewash to fit the commercial case (even that makes no sense).

Any aspirant flydubai pilot, many other issues notwithstanding, may care to carefully consider their decision to work for a company that imposes operations into a war zone. Aside from the personal safety aspect there are other issues - not addressed officially - whereby personal insurance etc could be negated.

Please be guided accordingly/ cheers.
olster is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2011, 11:22
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bur Dubai
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
olster - spot on!

Here are some actual quotes, cut & paste, from flydubai's memo to staff about ops into Kandahar:
  • The distance from the city, roaming patrols of over 200 soldiers, the wide open space around the airport, a 24 hour rocket attack detection radar, and minefields provide additional perimeter security.
  • Although rocket attacks within Kandahar airfield are extremely rare, with the risk of injury from such rocket attacks being equally as remote, all companies operating in and out of Kandahar airfield have been asked to communicate the “Rocket Alert Response Procedure” in line with their standard Safety and Security procedures. This procedure consists of the following:
  1. On hearing an audible siren, drop to the floor in the “duck and dive” maneuver. Hit the floor face down and cover the eyes.
  2. Once the first rocket detonates and when you feel safe to do so, make your way to the nearest bunker.
  3. To protect against such attacks, the airfield has specially designed blast walls which are located around the entire airfield.
  • Most of the attacks are meant more to harass than anything else. The base defenses are state‐of‐the art; the rockets aren't. When the attack is over the siren sounds again. "All clear, All clear”
It has also been stated that "The passengers carried are civilians rather than servicemen"…. not that the Taliban will give a ****, given that one 'Infidel' looks much like another in the eyes & RPG/SAM/MANPAD gunsights of Terry Taliban!

And flydubai still continues to preach "The safety of our crews is our #1 priority". Well, yet again, we can see what a crock of **** that really is!




Last edited by BurDubaiBob; 17th Jul 2011 at 01:17.
BurDubaiBob is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2011, 15:07
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: on earth
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't worry guys,

Remember , each time questions are asked to the chief pilot's meetings about safety issue like fatigue related with the 4 sectors at night or flying to Kabul , Kandahar etc...

The answer is always the same " IT IS LEGAL "

What can you say to that ? But what annoys me the most is that when there were guys who have been flying there and the chief pilot asked them about their experience , NONE of them did say that they think it was dangerous !!!
dubaigong is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2011, 20:34
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: China
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wrt to the advice to 'cover the eyes', is that so you don't have to witness your colleagues been blown to pieces ?!

dubaigong - Look at the following descriptions:
  1. Do you often feel used by the person?
  2. Have you often felt that he doesn't care about you?
  3. Does he lie and deceive you?
  4. Does he tend to make contradictory statements?
  5. Does he tend to take from you and not give back much?
  6. Does he often appeal to pity and / or seem to try to make you feel sorry for him?
  7. Does he try to make you feel guilty?
  8. Do you sometimes feel he is taking advantage of your good nature?
  9. Does he seem easily bored and need constant stimulation?
  10. Does he use a lot of flattery and / or does he interact with you in a way that makes you feel flattered even if he says nothing overtly complimentary?
  11. Does he make you feel worried and / or does he do it obviously or more cleverly and sneakily?
  12. Does he give you the impression you owe him?
  13. Does he chronically fail to take responsibility for harming others and / or does he blame everyone and everything but himself?
If these descriptions sound familiar, you are probably talking about someone - go figure?! - who can be classified as a Sociopath
ex-XL is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 06:40
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: High in the Sky
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am reminded of the famous Blackadder sketch when Baldrick asks Blackadder for guidance when stepping upon a mine: " Well, Baldrick, traditionally one hurls oneself 200 feet into the air and scatters four limbs in all directions..."
Olster, Blackadder was actually addressing Lieutenant George whilst atop No Man's land in that scene, even though bird brain Balders was there too.

However whilst that isn't so important, the contents of the breifing received actually is. As mentioned by BDB how ludicrous is it to receive infomation about what to do in a rocket attack and then declare that safety of the crew is the number one priority.

The brief looks to be something that our heroes in the military forces might receive, you know the ones who fly aircraft equipped with chaff, flares, able to fly evasive manoeuvres etc. Not sure we checked that options box.......
Voodoo 3 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 07:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: On the move!
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OMG

Brilliant Mr Olster!!!! Your usual wit and repartee appreciated by all. FYI, Flydubai just received certificate of all weather operations competency for Landings- CAT2 DH100 - RVR300m and Take Off -125m just what one needs after your 4th night in a row returning from Chittagong/Kathmandu/Khartoum/4-sector "red-eye" etc!

BUT IT IS LEGAL!!!!!!!!!!!
Mike Roweburst is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 08:22
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Under a deckchair, Jumeirah Beach, 3 lamppost from the left
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just sooooo thrilled at the thought of Kandahar I thought I would do some research, rather wish I hadn't.

Afghan Journal | Analysis & Opinion | Reuters.com

However Capt. D Spaceman say all is safe, and he would rather fly in there than Kabul as the ground forces can control the area under the approach path. So that's nice.

End of May saw a UN helicopter destroyed in a rocket attack and the main road into town is the highest danger category on the UN rating categories. To only be travelled in armored cars. So that's nice too.

Safety culture my arse.

F-C.
Flat Cap is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 10:30
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: EMA
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What shower of Sh**e

This place is clearly dangerous. FZ are treating the crews with contempt.
My Pals at FZ are now looking eleswhere for work.
giggedy is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 12:35
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is from the FCO website.

Safety and Security - Local Travel - Air Travel
Airlines operating to the EU are required to meet the safety standards established by the International Civil Aviation Organisation. The EU Aviation Security Committee (ASC) blacklisted all Afghan airlines flying to the EU on 23 November 2010 due to the poor record of its civil aviation oversight system. Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) employees in Afghanistan have been advised not to travel on airlines blacklisted by the EU ASC.

Some other airlines that operate in and out of Afghanistan may not meet international safety standards.

Safety and Security - Local Travel - Transiting UAE
Flying to Dubai and then transferring is the most common route into Afghanistan. It is illegal to transit the United Arab Emirates carrying unlicensed personal protection equipment. This includes, but is not limited to, body armour (including ballistic vests), weapon holsters and handcuffs. Other specialist technical equipment such as satellite phones, listening and recording devices, powerful cameras and binoculars, while freely available in the UK, may also require licenses. Persons found carrying any such items without a license may be subject to conviction resulting in imprisonment and substantial monetary fines in accordance with Emirati law.

Just who are we flying to Kandahar? The brief says non military.... therefore it must be civilian security staff, i.e. Ex military.........

It certainly isn’t a holiday destination is it..
macca32springer is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 15:35
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Foreign & Commonwealth Advice

The Brits at FDB might wish to read this:

Afghanistan travel advice

To summarise:
Southern Afghanistan:
  • We advise against all travel to Helmand, Kandahar, Nimroz, Uruzgan and Zabul
Compare this with:

Kabul:
  • We advise against all but essential travel to Kabul.
Accepting these duties will clearly require some careful consideration!




temporarily unsure is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 16:34
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Betwixt and between
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, they're not going to be botanists, that's for sure
Sciolistes is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2011, 18:40
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you can stay away from Alfukistand!
Brian Cohen is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2011, 14:38
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Big Softies....
Jonny Wilkinson is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2011, 16:20
  #14 (permalink)  
BDD
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Windermere, Florida
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't have a dog in this fight, but I would check your life insurance policy.
You might not be covered in a war zone.
BDD is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2011, 16:53
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: on earth
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to the last memo sent to us and the meeting organized by the management this afternoon , there is no problem at all with our insurance as it covers also war zone...
We should not be worried at all as the company will never send the aircraft if it was not safe to do so... they said...
And after talking to pilots who have been there with previous company , our chief pilot told us that these pilots have confirmed that there was nothing to worry about....

Let's see...
dubaigong is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2011, 08:06
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: second left, first right
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grrr tin hat time

The point that seems to be conveniently glossed over is that this is a thinly disguised contract for the military. We are not taking a bunch of local goat herders on holiday, this is a specific charter for military support staff. Now lets all hope that GAG has managed to get the powers that be to pay the locals to leave us alone as once the word gets around, the local lads with their MANPADS may be taking more than a passing interest in us. It's not the risk during the turn around, it's the first & last 5000ft operating into & out of the place that is more of a concern. We have to be lucky every time we go in to KDH, Terry & co only have to be lucky once. Stick a BOZ pod on the jet, pay me extra for putting my nuts on the block & I might, just might consider it. Make it obligatory (unless of course you're a scandic A scaler ), then it's toodle pip from me.
doubletap is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 01:10
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bur Dubai
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Clearly a case of 'patriotism' getting in the way of good sense!

The closing paragraph of the CP's recent 'Kandahar Update' said:
“It was a pleasure and a humbling experience to serve these people and give them a pleasant experience after what they have been through. They had waited two hours before boarding (DFS policy) and it was a joy to see their pleasure when we gave them the cold towels. They were tired and happy. Honestly it was an honor to serve them. I think we owe them this.”
Might I just point out that these Kandahar 'contractors' have chosen to go and work in a war zone and, no doubt, reap the rewards (financial) of working in such a dangerous environment.

So why should an aircrew (who've been given no choice about operating in to / out of that same war zone and who are paid no extra for doing so) find it "humbling" and / or an "honor" and / or why just should an aircrew "owe" such people anything ?!!

Wasn't it Samuel Johnson who once said, "Patriotism: The last refuge of the scoundrel" ?!!


Last edited by BurDubaiBob; 17th Jul 2011 at 02:17.
BurDubaiBob is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 04:38
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Betwixt and between
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would like to know how many aircraft operate in and out of Khandahar each day?
Sciolistes is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 09:11
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Crossroads of Europe
Posts: 64
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How many civilian movements, you mean? Not many. We're there once a week with a large cargo aircraft. I don't see many other civil movements. Plenty of F16s, UAVs, C130s etc. I can't say I feel 100% comfortable flying into Kandahar but it's not so bad that I want to quit my job to avoid it. Most companies that fly there issue instructions similar to those quoted above. They're probably designed to protect the company's ass, not yours, in case something goes wrong. An example: "On arrival in parking, all crews will determine the location of hardened, semi-hardened or improvised protective shelter nearest to the aircraft's parking stand" etc etc. To go to Kandahar or not - the choice is yours.
Charlie_Fox is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 10:54
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Goodbye
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wish it was

If it was MY choice i would not go. Unfortunately it is not.
StuckinFZ is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.