Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

Canadians to pay up to $998 for a visa!

Wikiposts
Search
Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

Canadians to pay up to $998 for a visa!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Dec 2010, 05:40
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The World
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is definitely the best laugh I've had all year when you mentioned Canada and culture in the same sentence. It's the 51st state of the US and sadly, too many ignorant people.

Still can't stop smiling.
Number2 is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 06:19
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Dubai
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EK just start Seattle and run a free bus up to YVR...like you did with CAI-HBE
FlyEmirates777 is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 06:41
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Country
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Panama Jack
So by your predictions, Jet II, the citizens of the UK, the Schengen Area, Japan, Australia and USA will be next in 2011 to be removed from the visa-on-arrival list and have to pay up to $1000 USD for a visit visa to the UAE because UAE citizens require visas to visit those countries?

I too am the national of a small country which is required to hold a visitor visa to visit countries such as Canada, the USA . . . even the UAE but that does not mean we do not provide a tourist card, on arrival, for a $5 fee because we realize that a) these countries are not going to change their policy reciprocal to ours because they have their concerns, and b) we gain so much by having visitors come to our country through their spending that putting high barriers only makes us poorer in the end.
If countries do not want to offer citizens of the UAE the same agreements for visa travel as their own citizens enjoy then surely it is up to the UAE to decide whether the benefits outweigh the costs by continuing with the arrangement.

In the case of Canada they obviously thought not.




Of course the governments of foreign states are unhappy about this. Somebody will always be unhappy about something.
No, not foreign States - Ed Stelmach is the Premier of Alberta and thinks that the Federal Governements decision to restrict the growth in air travel simply to protect Air Canada hurts the general economy in Alberta.

And he is right.
Jet II is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 07:55
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: South of North
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Prove that 'Ed' is right!!!!!

That traffic goes in and out regardless of whether EK is there or not. It might make it easier for some but that is about it. The trade will continue with or without EK.

Local politicians love this stuff because it makes them look important, adds some votes and gives them some bragging rights about what they did while in office while trying to keep that office.

The fact that others (outside his constituancy) might not benefit is irrelevant to him. The Federal gov't has decided, that as a whole, it does not benefit Canada. I might add that the Conservatives are about as pro business as you can get.
Trader is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 08:01
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UAE
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Canada is a very cold miserable country, in the winter its so cold its residents have to live in igloo's. There is NO culture, they are VERY racist, and the native indians still scalp people. If its not snowing, its raining all the time.
Being so far north, in the winter it's dark 23 hours a day.
So, please everyone steer clear. I hear Australia and New Zealand are lovely places
Togalk is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 08:11
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Country
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trader
Prove that 'Ed' is right!!!!!

That traffic goes in and out regardless of whether EK is there or not. It might make it easier for some but that is about it. The trade will continue with or without EK.
Well the experience from other parts of the world (Europe, US etc) is that expanding local airports and travel opportunities benefits the wider local economy. In much of Europe local governments pay airlines to operate to their local airport as they see it bringing wider economic benefits for all of their population.

As for trade continuing without good air travel links, well it might for a while but if a City does not have very good commuunication links nowdays they will fail to attract many Companies to move to that location - they will simply move to a location with better infrastructure.
Jet II is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 08:13
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: pit
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What country indulges in overestimating its importance because it has tripped over some fossil fuels, is geostrategically well positioned for aviation (overflight or hubbing), attracts a lot of people from the subcontinent and has very little cultural achievements to show?

Yes, both answers are correct: The UAE or Canada

Maybe that's an explanation for the mini cold war.
pool is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 08:47
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: home
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just saw the video on the other thread. Forget Canada, let's go to Sweden!!!
clevlandHD is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 09:15
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Country
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm, it appears that if you book through EK a visit visa for Canadian citizens is $75.

That compares with a UAE citizen visiting Canada who has to pay for a visit visa........$75
Jet II is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 14:43
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Post-Pit and Lovin' It.
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What country indulges in overestimating its importance because it has tripped over some fossil fuels, is geostrategically well positioned for aviation (overflight or hubbing), attracts a lot of people from the subcontinent and has very little cultural achievements to show?

Yes, both answers are correct: The UAE or Canada

Maybe that's an explanation for the mini cold war.
LOL

Now now pool, care to share with us which bastion of cultural achievement you hail from? From your comment it obviously isn't one with much of an education system...
nolimitholdem is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 15:12
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There isn't much said over here in Canada about Air Canada lobbying the CDN gov't for help in staving off competition from EK or any other airline. If the CDN gov't can't make decisions about who can and who can't have access to our airports without considering the impact both positive and negative before making its decision, gawd help us.

I believe initially they (AC) would/should have an input when it comes to bilateral agreements with foreign airlines intentions relative to passenger/commercial traffic into and out of Canada. As would all the other CDN airlines. So, I wouldn't think or suggest there is a major 'lobbying effort' on the part of AC or any other carrier over here to block or ban EK. There isn't. I also happen to think it's quite reasonable that AC will and should keep their eye on the ball.
There wasn't much fuss when QR asked for and was granted landing rights. When you look at the Gulf Region hubs, you have to ask why one carrier from that region should have more access to Canada than others from that region?

Canadians generally haven't a clue about EKs vision of dominating the world's airline industry and most CDNs couldn't give a stuff. EK's request for additional services and new destinations within Canada was looked at and the request was turned down. Decision made. Turn the page!

The immature reaction of the UAE gov't is understandable. It's a young country that doesn't run like any democratic model out there, including Canada. By escalating this issue they are putting themselves in yet another 'face saving' position where they will have to hope Canada doesn't cancel EK and EY landing rights and/or overflights. If that happens, the UAE, EK and EY are, 'ow you say? fuct.
As a mature and responsible nation it is highly unlikely that Canada will ever take such measures against the UAE or its air traffic use of Canadian airspace. That's how a mature nation behaves.

Lot's of VFR traffic between Canada and the sub-continent. India's population alone is 1,166,079,217.
The population of Canada is 33,487,208.Making Canada an insignificant market. EK is interested in providing uplift to the sub-continent from Canada and it is completely clear why they would be.

Canada is a multicultural country with people from all over the world who have now made Canada their home. Ethnic Groups (wholly or partly): North American Origin 40%, British Origin 33%, French Origin 16%, Other European 29%, Aboriginal peoples 4%, South, East & South-East Asian 9%, Other (mostly Caribbean, Arab, African, Latin/Central/South American and West Asian) 6%. The total comes to more than 100% because many Canadians (approximately 38%) have a mixed background.

Increased visa fees for Canadians travelling to the UAE is a non-starter. The reasons behind the re-introduction of visa fees for CDNs is childish at the least and immature at best and nothing more. UAE decision made. Turn the page.

Willie Everlearn
Willie Everlearn is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 15:49
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: "como todo buen piloto... mujeriego y borracho"
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jet II,

If countries do not want to offer citizens of the UAE the same agreements for visa travel as their own citizens enjoy then surely it is up to the UAE to decide whether the benefits outweigh the costs by continuing with the arrangement.
I guess we can agree on that. That is a right that every sovereign nation enjoys.

Your previous comment confused me because of your reference on "States"; I believe Canada uses the term "Provinces" to refer to their regional governments in the same way that the UAE refers to its regional segments as "Emirates"

Any any case, Trader has provided the answer I would have given to you. A difference with the elected political leaders in a country like Canada, and its provinces, and the dynastic ruling families in a country like the UAE is that in Canada, the politicians don't "tow the line" to maintain an outside image of political unity and take any and all opportunity to "one-up" themselves over their political opponents. I imagine that this is one of the perceived weaknesses of Canada on which the UAE's strategy is based.

Happy New Year
Panama Jack is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2011, 07:37
  #33 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Blighty
Posts: 1,438
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Right, I will shut down this thread unless some of you moderate your posts, and the tone and language used.

You have been warned.

EGGW.
EGGW is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2011, 08:53
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Anywhere there are cats to chase.
Age: 25
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tolgalk! Such talk!

Togalk, we have a number of ways of dealing with your type...

YouTube - Molson Canadian

Canada is a very cold miserable country, in the winter its so cold its residents have to live in igloo's. There is NO culture, they are VERY racist, and the native indians still scalp people. If its not snowing, its raining all the time.
Being so far north, in the winter it's dark 23 hours a day.
So, please everyone steer clear. I hear Australia and New Zealand are lovely places
Actually, in a number of areas, it is dark 24 hours a day- for up to three months- and it's sometimes it's -56C on the ground! Mind you, in the summer, it's 24 hour daylight and reasonable temps.

I have slept in an igloo. It was very comfortable. Unlike you I have tasted beaver.

EGGW: Moderator, can you please watch Togalk? I find his comments offensive.

Thanks,

Troff
troff is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2011, 14:00
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UAE
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok, obviously humor is lost on most of you. I was born and raised in Canada as were the last 4 generations of my family.
I'm sure the moderators had no problem understanding my initial post, thats why its still there.
GET A SENSE OF HUMOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

troff, I can pretty much guarantee I have tasted a lot more beaver then you ever have.
Togalk is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2011, 15:53
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Country
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by troff
Unlike you I have tasted beaver.
I taste beaver most nights........



Gets coat...........
Jet II is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2011, 16:48
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: not in Dubai anymore
Age: 94
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guys,
you have been married too long, most of the beavers are extinct or partially scalped since the nineties, heard there are some left in east germany (ask EGT) and the UK
GoreTex is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2011, 09:30
  #38 (permalink)  
Kapitanleutnant
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Just wondering...

Does anyone think that when the Harper Gov't is gone, that there will be a renewed sense of EK routes into Canada?

K
 
Old 2nd Jan 2011, 09:41
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: uae
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't think any change in Gov will have any short term effect. Foreign Affairs wont forget how childish the UAE was in this hole thing.
fatbus is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2011, 14:13
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is the Canada I know of...

YouTube - Banff Lake Louise Tourism

YouTube - Ancient Land, 2 min TV Ad, Newfoundland and Labrador Tourism

Last edited by ashwinrao; 2nd Jan 2011 at 21:51.
ashwinrao is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.