Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

Etihad Airways 320 pilot exceeds 320 kts below 3000'

Wikiposts
Search
Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

Etihad Airways 320 pilot exceeds 320 kts below 3000'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Oct 2010, 04:44
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ben, relax buddy...... God you boys are sensitive aren’t you? It’s ok as long as the 320 gets smashed left right and centre but god forbid we bring up a mishap in the elite squadron and everyone starts crying foul. Was it or wasn’t a complete failure to follow simple SOP in Manila? If the answer is yes relaxed my friend (learn to take one on the chin man, its ok) if it wasn’t then I guess I owe you and your sensitive side an apology.
As always Safe Flying and keep the blue stuff up and the brown stuff down
P.S. how do you know that I suck? I didn’t know we were that intimate!
Red_Z3 is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2010, 06:15
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: middle earth
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE]...all fleets have their days[QUOTE].......spot on.
atuk is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2010, 08:39
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Shadow of Burj Dubai
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ohhh I got it! he was doing 320Kts in an airbus 320.. so can I do 777Kts in my 777?
MumbaiRadio is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2010, 08:53
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: uk
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes, you can in Mumbai TMA only Class C Airspace no spd rest
CI999 is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2010, 11:13
  #25 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Korea
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
... and this is one of the reasons why we got that recent fob regarding pilot behaviour.....
WhistleBlower is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2010, 19:14
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Zealand
Age: 72
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a 320 hi speed

I have to agree, what is the big deal, all these guys wetting their pants over 320 knots at 3000 feet. If the controller said keep your speed up, whoopy, have fun. I must be getting old, because if we could do it, we would do it. It used to be a time, when jetA was cheap that many airlines flew barber pole, high speed climb, and descent when able.
NZ X man is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2010, 20:36
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BEN! You miserable old git!

Why don't you pack your balls up and retire? Surely a nice cup of coco and a swinging chair is more your pace.
easybusdriver1 is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2010, 22:44
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Here There Yonder
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, those were the days, 340kts to fifteen mile final, thrust idle, gear, flap and be stable at 1000ft. Kept the hear rate up. We have all turned into a wet lettuces.
Ndicho Moja is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2010, 05:48
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe we're all turning professional.....

If the company SOP is to fly 250kts below 5000ft and be full stabilised by 1500ft, why don't you just do it? If ATC give free speed or high speed, it's 250kts below 5000ft end of story.
break dancer is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2010, 09:21
  #30 (permalink)  
Sir Osis of the river
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well Said

Break Dancer, well said

That is the whole point of this thread. If Folks wanna be yahoos and go tearing around at 320 knots below 5000', they are more than welcome. But let them do it in their own a/c or in a company that does not have such a height/ speed restriction.

Follow the rules, they are usually right.

Sir O
 
Old 21st Oct 2010, 12:26
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Slovakia
Age: 65
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Requirement

It depends on where you are flying into. 250 kts is a legal requirement of the SIDs/STARs in Dubai for example.
This restriction is part of the textual description of the SIDs/STARs in the UAE AIP.
rennaps is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2010, 19:47
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Zealand
Age: 72
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hi speend below 3000 feet

Man whats happened, lots of "professional wet lettuce here. these days
NZ X man is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2010, 17:01
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The FO should have intervened!

Just because it's the CA's last day does not mean he can start breaking the rules in the book. I distinctly remember another scenario in an A320 where the Captain came in high, hot, and fast, 300+ knots below 10,000 ft (against their book), too high, and at a low altitude requested an orbit to lose altitude (another against the book thing), got spatially disoriented, and crashed the A320 in the water, killing everybody on board near Bahrain Airport. FO, hired at Gulf Air with about 200 hours, and roughly 400 hours A320 time, did not have the time/knowledge/experience to check his Captain and put a stop to the dangerous sh*t the Captain was doing.
Flyer1015 is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2010, 18:46
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really do not see the advantage of going that fast. There are many small reasons not to do it, and if you put them all together there is a potential thingsget out of hand.

There is no doubth that the margin for error is smaler and that because of this you may upset your collegue.

Having said so I think you should be able to do it. One day you might need it.

So to practise it from time to time is not a bad idea but under strict conditions.

Cabin ready for ldg; approach x-list completed and a margin build in i.e. you know what to do and do it quickly when you see that the margin is melting away.

But never upset your collegue and realize that they will not always object.
Pitch Up Authority is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2010, 10:43
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: eu
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Deliberate and unjustified SOP violations should not be condoned. If his ass was on fire and had to get the thing down in a hurry I don’t think anyone would have complained.

Do not try and tell us that having taken all the variables into account, flying an aircraft within its certified limits is unsafe or unprofessional. There is nothing wrong with a 300kt + descent, or requesting an orbit on the odd occasion you cock it up and need to lose a bit of height. If you get disorientated doing so maybe you need to get a job driving a bus of a different kind.

SOPS need to cater for the lowest common denominator and as a result you end up with silly restrictions and 950 page OMAs.

Just a sign of things to come with all the “PROJECT X” flying schools out there these days.
inciter is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2010, 11:21
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Stratosphere
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like this guy was in a hurry to get home!
Janu is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2010, 13:00
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NG Kaptain . . .

I fly slow when I can because the hours we work we might as well maximize overtime
Neither professional nor smart nor clever on your part. . . Because someday your F/O will turn you in, if not the QAR data analyst will catch your trend sooner...and you'll be turfed, as you should be.
GlueBall is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2010, 14:28
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: the past
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DAMN...

Somebody needs to conduct an energy management class on this thread..Unless you're flying the space shuttle columbia and dead stickin it to the ground..320 kts at 3000' seems a bit much on a commercial airliner assuming you're probably no more than 12 to 15 miles from landing at that altitude...but hey, to each his own i guess..just hope im not in that deck..
RiteRudder is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2010, 05:58
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: turkey
Age: 50
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Give me a break

TO the guy that made the comment about flying like an F15. Dude you would have to be doing over 500kts to even be considered, and more like 300AGL. What a joke, do you configure like 30 miles out from the airport too? I am so sick of all these wussies afraid to fly the plane at the barber pole. Im a 737 guy, so don't know much about Airbus, but give me a break. The best way to save fuel would be a flight to the absolute minimum distance required to descend, and then an idle thrust descent at max forward speed all the way to final. But ofcourse everyone is afraid of doing over 300kts.

I used to come in at 370KIAS on the Falcon 2000EASy into Delhi, intercept the loc from 8 miles out, gear first, then flaps and spbrk ofcourse. Save time, and was fun. Oh i forgot, flying isnt supposed to be fun, we have rules!!!
Turkpilot is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2010, 07:03
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: out bush
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah have fun but did anyone think of the possibility of "bird impact speed limitations" ( i'm not an A320 driver but you will find it as a limitation in some aircraft flight manuals).., rough air/ turbulence/ holding/go around/ change of plans..etc you can still have fun in an aircraft but exercise your professionalism and common sense if you have any.. and think of the people behind you..
outboundjetsetter is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.