Insulate Britain protestors.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Kristiansand
Posts: 49
Insulate Britain protestors.
Justifiable actions or just being disruptive?
I was caught up near Leatherhead, Surrey today by this group and they getting a lot of aggro from drivers. One protestor was arguing with a policeman who was trying to move them on that what he was doing was illegal. I assume holding up traffic without good reason is also against the law?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...herts-58558355
I was caught up near Leatherhead, Surrey today by this group and they getting a lot of aggro from drivers. One protestor was arguing with a policeman who was trying to move them on that what he was doing was illegal. I assume holding up traffic without good reason is also against the law?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...herts-58558355
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glorious Devon
Posts: 678
Justifiable actions or just being disruptive?
I was caught up near Leatherhead, Surrey today by this group and they getting a lot of aggro from drivers. One protestor was arguing with a policeman who was trying to move them on that what he was doing was illegal. I assume holding up traffic without good reason is also against the law?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...herts-58558355
I was caught up near Leatherhead, Surrey today by this group and they getting a lot of aggro from drivers. One protestor was arguing with a policeman who was trying to move them on that what he was doing was illegal. I assume holding up traffic without good reason is also against the law?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...herts-58558355
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 22,894
Police want to go for a coffee and tell the people held up if they are gone when they get back no problem.
Their names and addresses should be taken and every council should be told to go out and plant a lampost in the middle of the pavement blocking their drives.
Their names and addresses should be taken and every council should be told to go out and plant a lampost in the middle of the pavement blocking their drives.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bolton ENGLAND
Age: 77
Posts: 979
That would seem an expensive pointless exercise.... I am sure Council Tax could be spent more productively...
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 22,894
A tree then? or a speed camera, that would generate funds to pay for it and appeal to the knob who's house it is, as its all about green credentials, thus reducing his complaints about being unable to get his car out.
Just hose them down with pink dye or lurid green, then everyone from their work collegues to people in the street will know where they have been.
Just hose them down with pink dye or lurid green, then everyone from their work collegues to people in the street will know where they have been.
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Ramsgate Kent !
Age: 62
Posts: 19
Currently running a long term project to remove flammable or untested external building insulation from shops, offices, hotels. hospitals. freehold houses, leasehold properties and anything else.
Kind of shame my operatives canny get to site but others will disagree
Kind of shame my operatives canny get to site but others will disagree

Thought police antagonist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
Posts: 1,165
A tree then? or a speed camera, that would generate funds to pay for it and appeal to the knob who's house it is, as its all about green credentials, thus reducing his complaints about being unable to get his car out.
Just hose them down with pink dye or lurid green, then everyone from their work collegues to people in the street will know where they have been.
Just hose them down with pink dye or lurid green, then everyone from their work collegues to people in the street will know where they have been.
That said, you do seem to be very antagonistic towards people who exercise their current, before a certain Bill imposes draconian restrictions, right to peaceful protest. Why ?...and no, I wouldn't have liked to be caught up in the jam, but, I would empathise with their right to protest.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London
Posts: 408
Erm, sorry, but, Pam Ayres is somewhat more accomplished with her poetry offerings.
That said, you do seem to be very antagonistic towards people who exercise their current, before a certain Bill imposes draconian restrictions, right to peaceful protest. Why ?...and no, I wouldn't have liked to be caught up in the jam, but, I would empathise with their right to protest.
That said, you do seem to be very antagonistic towards people who exercise their current, before a certain Bill imposes draconian restrictions, right to peaceful protest. Why ?...and no, I wouldn't have liked to be caught up in the jam, but, I would empathise with their right to protest.
Yes, they have the right to a peaceful protest but they most certainly don't have the right to clearly break the law when making their protest.
Would you be so accommodating if they had invaded your garden and spray painted their logo onto the outside of your house?
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Only occasionally above FL50
Age: 69
Posts: 140
I guess Grenfell Tower and hundreds of other buildings shows what can happen when there is a headlong rush to insulate buildings without proper testing and controls in place first. I’m all for improving insulation as these people want but throwing public money at the problem without sorting out all the issues first doesn’t seem like a good strategy.
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,514
Would you be so accommodating if they had invaded your garden and spray painted their logo onto the outside of your house?
....ummmmm ???? why would they do that?
I'm fairly certain that they are not anti gardens or exterior decoration !!!
....ummmmm ???? why would they do that?
I'm fairly certain that they are not anti gardens or exterior decoration !!!

Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,514
Currently running a long term project to remove flammable or untested external building insulation from shops, offices, hotels. hospitals. freehold houses, leasehold properties and anything else.
Kind of shame my operatives canny get to site but others will disagree
Kind of shame my operatives canny get to site but others will disagree


Rather a pity that it will be a very long term enterprise due to the incompetence, indifference and lack of due diligence of those responsible for the installation and maintenance.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London
Posts: 408


Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 490
Just look at all that pale blue paint!
For environmental colour pollution, the high viz vests win again.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 490
I guess Grenfell Tower and hundreds of other buildings shows what can happen when there is a headlong rush to insulate buildings without proper testing and controls in place first. I’m all for improving insulation as these people want but throwing public money at the problem without sorting out all the issues first doesn’t seem like a good strategy.
The cladding products were dangerous. And this was known. A woefully inadequate regulatory environment led to Grenville. These people are not arguing for reckless implementation of dangerous products, just that the government does something, after decades of token policy, about the level of energy wastage in the UK housing stock.
There is a big difference between demanding change and adopting nuisance tactics on the one hand, and building and renovating with wanton disregard for people’s‘ safety.
Last edited by Torquetalk; 18th Sep 2021 at 05:11.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Only occasionally above FL50
Age: 69
Posts: 140
Wow.
The cladding products were dangerous. And this was known. A woefully inadequate regulatory environment led to Grenville. These people are not arguing for reckless implementation of dangerous products, just that the government does something, after decades of token policy, about the level of energy wastage in the UK housing stock.
There is a big difference between demanding change and adopting nuisance tactics on the one hand, and building and renovating with wanton disregard for people’s‘ safety.
The cladding products were dangerous. And this was known. A woefully inadequate regulatory environment led to Grenville. These people are not arguing for reckless implementation of dangerous products, just that the government does something, after decades of token policy, about the level of energy wastage in the UK housing stock.
There is a big difference between demanding change and adopting nuisance tactics on the one hand, and building and renovating with wanton disregard for people’s‘ safety.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 490
I absolutely agree! My point is that the regulatory issues need to be sorted and the necessary army of competent installers trained in order to get the insulation installed. I don’t think this can be done overnight and it is rather naive of the protestors who seem to think it can.
The protesters are just challenging, annoyingly, the broader issue of energy wastage.