Wikiposts
Search
Space Flight and Operations News and Issues Following Space Flight, Testing, Operations and Professional Development

Megarocket

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Jan 2021, 07:35
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Cheltenham, UK
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to the BBC News

The four RS-25s can generate 1.6 million lbs (7 Meganewtons) of thrust - the force that propels a rocket through the air.
BirdmanBerry is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2021, 09:18
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Here
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tdracer
Yellow, that's popular myth, but it was never actually true for any operational rocket.
Think about it - if you needed to burn off fuel to reach the liftoff weight - why not just reduce the starting fuel load?
Thanks wiggy - good to know some sanity remains at NASA. I'm still angry that we're spending tens of billions of dollars to re-create the heavy lift capability we had five decades ago and simply threw away.
As I say, I am happy to be corrected by those who do know about these things.

The myth seemed reasonable to my mind because I assume a rocket engine does not go from ‘zero power’ to stable state ‘top whack’ power instantaneously and that some time was require to go from one state to the other. Using unnecessary, overweight fuel during that power build up stage seemed plausible to me. I suppose a proper myth has to have a large degree of plausibility.

I’m surprised no-one has levered in the expression it isn’t rocket science yet in this thread!
yellowtriumph is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2021, 09:22
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 144
Received 115 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by yellowtriumph
I’m surprised no-one has levered in the expression it isn’t rocket science yet in this thread!
That's because it is rocket science!
Hokulea is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2021, 11:39
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,507
Received 179 Likes on 98 Posts
Originally Posted by yellowtriumph
... and what will Greta make of all this? Can Nasa designers come up with some electric equivalent that can be plugged in and charged up overnight?
No need,
Hydrogen and LOX only exhaust steam.

Having said that, Methane and LOX produce steam and CO2, so Greta not so happy .
TURIN is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2021, 11:51
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm. All manufacturers in the world: we can make engines smaller, fuel consumption is lower, and power is higher.
Rolls Roys and UK Space Agency: We will try to build a nuclear rocket engine to reduce the mass of the rockets.
NASA: we can connect 4 engines at once.
ThomaJo is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2021, 18:24
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,420
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
The four RS-25s can generate 1.6 million lbs (7 Meganewtons) of thrust - the force that propels a rocket through the air.
Pretty big difference between "Meganewtons" and "Megatons"
tdracer is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.