Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Social > Jet Blast
Reload this Page >

Coronavirus: The Thread

Jet Blast Topics that don't fit the other forums. Rules of Engagement apply.

Coronavirus: The Thread

Old 30th Jun 2020, 22:19
  #8101 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 10,499
And again.....

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...tists-say.html

How having a cold could protect you from Covid-19: Scientists uncover MORE evidence that fighting off mild respiratory bugs may make you immune to the coronavirus

Having endured a common cold could protect people from getting severe Covid-19, according to scientists.

A study suggests the immune system's reaction to different coronaviruses could be very similar to its reaction to the one behind the pandemic. As a result, lasting immunity from those viruses — known to cause colds — may help the body fight off Covid-19 if someone catches it, meaning they get less seriously ill.

The German research also focuses on a less-discussed type of immunity, instead of antibodies which have been at the forefront of a lot of studies. T-cell immunity appears to be more common among infected patients and scientists say it may potentially last even longer.

Eight out of 10 people who have never even had the disease have some degree of protection because of colds they've had in the past, the study claimed. And even Covid-19 patients with very mild symptoms developed a strong T-cell immune response, whereas they do not appear to have strong antibody responses.....
ORAC is online now  
Old 30th Jun 2020, 22:33
  #8102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 165
Originally Posted by parabellum View Post
Right at the beginning of the UK pandemic when unhelpful journalists were drawing comparisons between the UK and other countries one of the medical scientists gave what I thought was a sensible explanation for variations in the severity of infection. The scientists said the extent of exposure to the virus would effect the seriousness of infection and this was definitely proportional to the density of population in any one country and in order to establish this density it was necessary to calculate the average number of people in one square mile of country, he then compared France, Germany and Italy with England and it was shown that the people per square mile in England was far greater than on the continent, there fore the risk of extended exposure to the virus was much greater.
Can you reference some data supporting the idea that the severity of infections, rather than their number, is related to population density? If it's true it's obviously both interesting and important.

When you talk about severity I assume you mean you mean something like CFR or IFR (case or infection fatality rate)?

PS I get the impression that hospital triage is largely in terms of age and co-morbidities, rather than early-stage symptoms. In which case it's difficult to see how a greater infecting 'dose' would only makes its presence felt at the point serious complications set in. Typically 15 days after infection (10 days after symptoms appear).


Peter H is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2020, 23:04
  #8103 (permalink)  
Psychophysiological entity
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tweet Rob_Benham Famous author. Well, slightly famous.
Age: 80
Posts: 4,862
There's a lot in these last posts.

Viral shock. We might have made that up on this thread, but it's an obvious factor. Breath in a mass of virions and you're in much greater danger.

Alighting point. There's ( I think ) a gas exchange capsule that does not trigger an immune response. By the time infected cells start producing perhaps 10,000:1 response and releasing them back up, it's horribly late to set the immune system into action.
B cells produce and secrete antibodies, activating the immune system to destroy the pathogens. The main difference between T cells and B cells is that T cells can only recognize viral antigens outside the infected cells whereas B cells can recognize the surface antigens of bacteria and viruses.2 days
It's only England that has the high population. Scotland and Wales dilutes the figures more than a tad.

Best response on the planet. South Korea - with five other excellent responders. From memory, London, ~4,500 k heads per sq/km Seoul, 17,500. Masks that were ready because of a lesson learned. MASKS MASKS MASKS. The secondary masks bought near the results of the N95.

Around here, about one in twenty wear one. Poor souls cry that their too claustrophobic to wear one. Poor diddums. They should have been around in the war.
Loose rivets is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2020, 05:57
  #8104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 1,928
I have noticed a number of people who do wear mask only wear them on their chin or at the most their mouth leaving their nose uncovered or they pull them up and down thus constantly touching their face.
N707ZS is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2020, 07:23
  #8105 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 10,499
Time for a crack-down in sweatshops ?

Leicester Outbreak

From POLITICO:

Factory records: Among the possible factors mooted for Leicester’s outbreak are poorly regulated industrial sites in the city. And right on cue the Guardian’s Archie Bland reports that some of the city’s garment factories “stayed open as normal throughout the coronavirus crisis,” and “ordered workers to continue to report for duty even when they were sick.” Citing a report by campaign group Labour Behind the Label, he says one staffer “told his employer he was unwell but was told to come in to work anyway — even after testing positive … Workers in a number of factories told the group there had been no physical distancing measures in place and that their employers had closed only for a few days, if at all.”
ORAC is online now  
Old 1st Jul 2020, 07:31
  #8106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Ilmington, Warwickshire
Posts: 132
Originally Posted by ORAC View Post
Time for a crack-down in sweatshops ?

Leicester Outbreak

From POLITICO:

Factory records: Among the possible factors mooted for Leicester’s outbreak are poorly regulated industrial sites in the city. And right on cue the Guardian’s Archie Bland reports that some of the city’s garment factories “stayed open as normal throughout the coronavirus crisis,” and “ordered workers to continue to report for duty even when they were sick.” Citing a report by campaign group Labour Behind the Label, he says one staffer “told his employer he was unwell but was told to come in to work anyway — even after testing positive … Workers in a number of factories told the group there had been no physical distancing measures in place and that their employers had closed only for a few days, if at all.”

I can feel an accusation of racism coming from this statement, no matter that it might be a very pertinent fact.
BehindBlueEyes is online now  
Old 1st Jul 2020, 07:45
  #8107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,827
Originally Posted by ORAC View Post
Time for a crack-down in sweatshops ?

Leicester Outbreak

From POLITICO:

Factory records: Among the possible factors mooted for Leicester’s outbreak are poorly regulated industrial sites in the city. And right on cue the Guardian’s Archie Bland reports that some of the city’s garment factories “stayed open as normal throughout the coronavirus crisis,” and “ordered workers to continue to report for duty even when they were sick.” Citing a report by campaign group Labour Behind the Label, he says one staffer “told his employer he was unwell but was told to come in to work anyway — even after testing positive … Workers in a number of factories told the group there had been no physical distancing measures in place and that their employers had closed only for a few days, if at all.”
Anyone who has ever worked around the back streets of Leicester, and not just the inner city parts would not be in the least surprised by these revelations. But there will be other factors in play included multiple generations living in overcrowded conditions, and an astonishing number of residents who, although they've been in the the UK for 50 odd years still can't comprehend English; they are mainly female, and held under the thumbs of a very patriarchal culture.
ATNotts is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2020, 08:45
  #8108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: apogee
Age: 65
Posts: 59
Poorly regulated but apparently well known?
Did anyone expect a different outcome?
meadowrun is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2020, 09:55
  #8109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 17,208
Facinating chart to watch showing the spread by countries

https://public.flourish.studio/visua...0/embed?auto=1
NutLoose is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2020, 10:41
  #8110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 926
Originally Posted by NutLoose View Post
Facinating chart to watch showing the spread by countries

https://public.flourish.studio/visua...0/embed?auto=1
Indeed.

Would be interesting to see one corrected for population size also.
currawong is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2020, 18:10
  #8111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West Wiltshire, UK
Age: 67
Posts: 378
Interesting bit of work from Sweden: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-53248660

People testing negative for coronavirus antibodies may still have some immunity, a study has suggested.

For every person testing positive for antibodies, two were found to have specific T-cells which identify and destroy infected cells.

This was seen even in people who had mild or symptomless cases of Covid-19.

But it's not yet clear whether this just protects that individual, or if it might also stop them from passing on the infection to others.

Researchers at the Karolinksa Institute in Sweden tested 200 people for both antibodies and T-cells.

Some were blood donors while others were tracked down from the group of people first infected in Sweden, mainly returning from earlier affected areas like northern Italy.

This could mean a wider group have some level of immunity to Covid-19 than antibody testing figures, like those published as part of the UK Office for National Statistics Infection Survey, suggest.

It's likely those people did mount an antibody response, but either it had faded or was not detectable by the current tests.

And these people should be protected if they are exposed to the virus for a second time.

Prof Danny Altmann at Imperial College London described the study as "robust, impressive and thorough" and said it added to a growing body of evidence that "antibody testing alone underestimates immunity".
VP959 is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2020, 19:48
  #8112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: 3NM from LROP, 80ft AGL
Posts: 13
Originally Posted by VP959 View Post
For every person testing positive for antibodies, two were found to have specific T-cells which identify and destroy infected cells.
I looked at the study, it's very technical, took me a while to find the information the BBC article is talking about in it: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...888v1.full.pdf

The interesting part is this chart:



The blue bars represent blood donors. Apparently they found 4 people with antibodies, and 9 people with T-cells, out of 31.
The pink bars represent exposed relatives. They found 17 people with antibodies, and 26 with T-cells, out of 28.
The green bars represent mild convalescent. 27 people with antibodies, 30 with T-cells, out of 31.
The red bars represent severe convalescent. All 23 people had both antibodies and T-cells.

This means studies relying just on antibody tests to estimate the IFR would overestimate it by some amount.
MikeSnow is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2020, 07:09
  #8113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Balikpapan, INDONESIA
Age: 68
Posts: 536
From my preferred carrier :

Every aircraft in the Uno Hoo Airlines Group fleet is equipped with High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters, which remove more than 99.9% of particulates such as viruses and bacteria. Cabin air is also refreshed every 2 to 3 minutes
Is that correct? And does it matter anyway?
If they filter the incoming air then it'll only be a help if the outside air is contaminated.
They can only help with re-circulated air and any snot that gets entrained will still be there until it hits the filter.
WingNut60 is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2020, 08:43
  #8114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Sabotage Central Office
Posts: 0
I agree wingnut, its of little help.
Even if the filters are that good the air and any aerosols within it is still moving through the cabin until it enters the intakes to the filter.

Its just another piece of disingenuous information designed to get people travelling regardless of the true risk.

Its a fact that we are going to have to live (or die) with this virus and I for one would prefer governments, businesses and the TV Talking Heads to be truthfull, take for instance the opening soon to happen opening of pubs and restaurants anyone with a clue knows it will result in increased infection rates and deaths............I wish these people could be honest and stop telling lies like " we are following the science".
Slaine is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2020, 08:46
  #8115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,827
I was just browsing the daily new infection data from Johns Hopkins; and it's really noticeable the countries that are, and aren't making a decent fist of controlling Covid-19. Looking at countries that have populist, presidents; USA, Mexico, Brazil and the Philippines; all are largely out of control. You could say,as regards USA, Brazil and Mexico that North America is the epicentre of the outbreak now, and you'd be right.....but, take a look at Canada, profile similar to most European countries.

Is there some correlation between presidential competence, or competence at the top generally and poor control of Covid-19? Perhaps yes. Does that lack of competence reflect badly on the governments of the UK and Sweden, again I'd say yes. The voters, once the dust has settled may come to similar conclusions.
ATNotts is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2020, 10:17
  #8116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Manchester, England
Age: 54
Posts: 840
Originally Posted by ATNotts View Post
I was just browsing the daily new infection data from Johns Hopkins; and it's really noticeable the countries that are, and aren't making a decent fist of controlling Covid-19. Looking at countries that have populist, presidents; USA, Mexico, Brazil and the Philippines; all are largely out of control. You could say,as regards USA, Brazil and Mexico that North America is the epicentre of the outbreak now, and you'd be right.....but, take a look at Canada, profile similar to most European countries.

Is there some correlation between presidential competence, or competence at the top generally and poor control of Covid-19? Perhaps yes. Does that lack of competence reflect badly on the governments of the UK and Sweden, again I'd say yes. The voters, once the dust has settled may come to similar conclusions.
The sample is probably too small to be statistically significant, but countries with female leaders seem to be doing better (Taiwan, Germany, New Zealand). I guess the opposite of the macho populist examples you give.
Curious Pax is online now  
Old 2nd Jul 2020, 11:09
  #8117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,827
Originally Posted by Curious Pax View Post
The sample is probably too small to be statistically significant, but countries with female leaders seem to be doing better (Taiwan, Germany, New Zealand). I guess the opposite of the macho populist examples you give.
Certainly Jacinda Ardern appears to have accounted herself very well, and unlike in the USA the State Governments of Germany seem to have cooperated very well with Angela Merkel, despite often being lead by a Minister President from another party, though generally in coalition - compare and contrast the the American mess. Women tend to be more pragmatic, and less bombastic than men, and that trait may have proved a boon in tackling the Covid-19 crisis.
ATNotts is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2020, 14:07
  #8118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: apogee
Age: 65
Posts: 59
They are apparently having covid-19 parties in Alabama, the purpose of which are to catch the virus.
If the populations, those stubborn as mules and dumb as sacks of hammers, will not follow the basic preventative measures - distance, masks, there will be illness.
Let's see just how well the Fourth of July weekend goes. Just how many will flock to beaches, parties and bars etc. without caution.

There will need to be some types of coercion required to get much more of the population to abide with the basics to have any hope of control. Half-assed measures will not accomplish the task.
Good leadership would help..
meadowrun is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2020, 15:35
  #8119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,827
Originally Posted by meadowrun View Post
They are apparently having covid-19 parties in Alabama, the purpose of which are to catch the virus.
If the populations, those stubborn as mules and dumb as sacks of hammers, will not follow the basic preventative measures - distance, masks, there will be illness.
Let's see just how well the Fourth of July weekend goes. Just how many will flock to beaches, parties and bars etc. without caution.

There will need to be some types of coercion required to get much more of the population to abide with the basics to have any hope of control. Half-assed measures will not accomplish the task.
Good leadership would help..
The USA will be in a pretty exclusive club including Brazil and much of central America along with the Indian subcontinent where they are basically barred from travelling to other countries such as most of Europe and much of the Far East. If the population is comfortable with that situation, alongside ever growing Covid-19 case numbers and deaths then so be it; and given that the majority don't have passports and have now desire to leave "the homeland" that's completely fine, except that the result will be increasing trade dominance of China and potentially Europe at the ultimate cost of the USA. The President is either oblivious to the dangers (probably) or powerless (perhaps to some extent) to do anything about them.
ATNotts is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2020, 15:48
  #8120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,827
Sort of Coronavirus related, but I have to say that this proposed statue reminds me of the musical box that used to play at the start of kids programme "Camberwick Green".

Am I showing my age or what??

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-532...to-include-ppe
ATNotts is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.