Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Social > Jet Blast
Reload this Page >

Starlink Satellite train

Jet Blast Topics that don't fit the other forums. Rules of Engagement apply.

Starlink Satellite train

Old 2nd Dec 2019, 13:35
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Sunnydale
Posts: 156
Starlink Satellite train

Plodding across the Atlantic this morning I was absent mindedly staring out the window enjoying the view as slowly but surely my eyes adjusted to the Milky Way coming in to view. A couple of nice shooting starts. And then a satellite passed overhead. And then another. And another and another and another and another. I stopped counting after 20.

After my post flight snooze I googled and found this.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star...n)?wprov=sfti1

At first I was impressed by what I saw. But after seeing as many as I did I was a little disappointed because it started distracting me from my usual favourites of Orion in all its glory.

60 was distracting enough. Then I read on 12000 of the blighters!!!! Iím all for the advancement of life and knowledge on this blue marble. And the internet is a powerful tool for knowledge. But are we going too far???
back to Boeing is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2019, 15:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 5,428
Originally Posted by back to Boeing View Post
I’m all for the advancement of life and knowledge on this blue marble. And the internet is a powerful tool for knowledge. But are we going too far???
FWIW these satellites are starting to P off many astronomers, both amateur and professional...

https://www.space.com/spacex-starlin...ervations.html

When the company launched its first set of Starlink internet satellites in May, those with their eyes attuned to the night sky immediately realized that the objects were incredibly bright. Professional astronomers worried the satellites would interfere with scientific observations and amateur appreciation of the stars."That first few nights, it was like, 'Holy not-publishable-word,'" Jonathan McDowell, an astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, told Space.com. "That kind of was the wake-up call."
https://www.theverge.com/2019/5/29/1...ight-pollution

https://globalmeteornetwork.org/?author=1
wiggy is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2019, 16:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: There and here
Posts: 1,711
Whilst it's admirable (or malevolent) for the companies to want global internet for all, by further cluttering near-earth space with hundreds and potentially thousands of satellites seems counter-productive to my simple mind. I wonder if the mathematicians can quantify how much higher the chances are of collisions between said satellites and others of the same genre and all the space junk that litters Low Earth Orbit. I realise that Space is big, even that which surrounds us, but adding to the mix just seems like madness to me.
SpringHeeledJack is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2019, 16:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Currently within the EU
Posts: 325
The crazy thing is that there is no control or oversight over the launch of satellites. It's a purely commercial thing - anyone or any business can send up as many as they can afford. The only regulation is of the frequencies they can use to communicate.

I don't see why they shouldn't be controlled as strictly as airline operations.
Sallyann1234 is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2019, 22:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oz
Posts: 229
Kessler Syndrome?
clark y is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 08:13
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: There and here
Posts: 1,711
Very possible. How it hasn't happened in part already is puzzling.
SpringHeeledJack is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 08:30
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 5,428
Originally Posted by Sallyann1234 View Post
The crazy thing is that there is no control or oversight over the launch of satellites.

I don't see why they shouldn't be controlled as strictly as airline operations.
I think (from memory, from something I vaguely recall reading) there are agreements about the positioning of geostationary satellites, with them being allocated a "box" to operate in. Other than that - ?
wiggy is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 10:05
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Currently within the EU
Posts: 325
Originally Posted by wiggy View Post
I think (from memory, from something I vaguely recall reading) there are agreements about the positioning of geostationary satellites, with them being allocated a "box" to operate in. Other than that - ?
Geostationary broadcast satellites are positioned according to area coverage and frequency coordination.
Sallyann1234 is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 10:55
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 5,428
Originally Posted by Sallyann1234 View Post
Geostationary broadcast satellites are positioned according to area coverage and frequency coordination.

I'm aware of that, but I also thought (possibly mistakenly) that I had read/heard that because that piece of "real estate" was of such value there was an agreement/coordination system to try and ensure such satellites (and of course it's not just comms sats) remained in an assigned "box" whilst they were operational and that once they became "inop" if possible they were moved out of the geostationary belt.

I'll see if I can find out further...

Edit to add: here you go:

There's a Parking Problem..
wiggy is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 11:03
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Currently within the EU
Posts: 325
Originally Posted by wiggy View Post
I'm aware of that, but I also thought (possibly mistakenly) that I had read/heard that because that piece of "real estate" was of such value there was an agreement/coordination system to try and ensure such satellites (and of course it's not just comms sats) remained in an assigned "box" whilst they were operational and that once they became "inop" if possible they were moved out of the geostationary belt.

I'll see if I can find out further...
​​​​​​Yes, you are right. There is a coordination system for geostationary satellites because there is a limited capacity in the Clarke belt.
But there is no control for all these new satellites that the OP refers to, other than frequency assignments.
Sallyann1234 is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 11:14
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 5,428
Originally Posted by Sallyann1234 View Post
​​​​​​
But there is no control for all these new satellites that the OP refers to, other than frequency assignments.
Correct...I've never claimed otherwise.
wiggy is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 11:58
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Currently within the EU
Posts: 325
Originally Posted by wiggy View Post
Correct...I've never claimed otherwise.
I never said you did
Sallyann1234 is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2019, 20:19
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 127
There could be even more:

But SpaceX isnít alone in its satellite broadband ambitions: An international consortium called OneWeb is aiming to put its own broadband constellation into space with more than a billion dollars in backing from Airbus, SoftBank, Virgin Group and other partners. OneWebís first launch is expected to to occur within the next six months.
Geekwire

If thousands of these craft are sent aloft, what's the chance of damage to Moon or Mars mission craft, probe launches, or even future satellite launches?
John Marsh is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2019, 20:26
  #14 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 10,075
List of planned constellations at table 1.......

https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...6889671930045X
ORAC is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2019, 20:43
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 54
Posts: 2,679
Space is big, really big. I mean you may think its a long way down the road to the chemist but thats just peanuts to space, listen.....


Ah Douglas.
TURIN is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.