Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Social > Jet Blast
Reload this Page >

Fake news before itís time? Or something else?

Jet Blast Topics that don't fit the other forums. Rules of Engagement apply.

Fake news before itís time? Or something else?

Old 12th Oct 2018, 10:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 673
Fake news before itís time? Or something else?

Everything these days is debatable, or so it seems.
Whatever happened to...Alan Godfrey.
Here’s Frank Bough and is that a young David Icke?


Last edited by Stan Woolley; 12th Oct 2018 at 22:42.
Stan Woolley is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2018, 14:43
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 10,466
Fake news before it's time for what ?
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2018, 14:59
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 673
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK View Post
Fake news before it's time for what ?
What do you mean Ďfor whatí?
Stan Woolley is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2018, 15:04
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 155
“...it’s...” is an abbreviation of “it is” (or “it has”).
gruntie is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2018, 15:07
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 673
Originally Posted by gruntie View Post
ď...itís...Ē is an abbreviation of ďit isĒ (or ďit hasĒ).
Thanks grunty

The grammar police eh. Pathetic.
Stan Woolley is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2018, 15:14
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: There and here
Posts: 1,659
Yes David Icke. I wonder if this was the trigger for him becoming an alternative personality ? Frank Bough, everyone's dad or grandad, I still can't get over the revelations that he attended (but didn't take part) cocaine and partner swapping parties in London ;-) As to the copper in the film, he seems very plausible. I wonder what he says today ? Anyone who wears a mullet isn't worried about what others will think of them!
SpringHeeledJack is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2018, 16:12
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 673
Originally Posted by SpringHeeledJack View Post
Yes David Icke. I wonder if this was the trigger for him becoming an alternative personality ? Frank Bough, everyone's dad or grandad, I still can't get over the revelations that he attended (but didn't take part) cocaine and partner swapping parties in London ;-) As to the copper in the film, he seems very plausible. I wonder what he says today ? Anyone who wears a mullet isn't worried about what others will think of them!


My guess is that he would say exactly the same thing now as he did then.

Yes, the looks are quite strange.
Stan Woolley is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2018, 16:38
  #8 (permalink)  
Thought police antagonist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
Posts: 917
I'm inclined to believe the police officer and his encounter with some form of unknown flying object.

When officialdom , across the globe, starts making strenuous denials to negate such sightings, and lets be fair, there have been many well documented and recorded sightings which can't be explained by what we assume to know is flying around, this means "funny stuff " that doesn't officially exist, but does, or cloud formations....I've seen a few "mother ships " over the years, certainly over N.Yorks and Scotland, but there again given the years I spent gliding, lenticulars always attracted, still do in fact, my attention .

I've seen one object I couldn't identify, posted on here about it ,which was a glowing red object, constant speed, heading then a turn through about 90degs....the Chinese Lantern was the obvious explanation except for the fact the speed, height were constant and the subsequent change of heading. No strobes, no position or nav lights, just a red light overall.

It's easy to be dismissive about any sightings, same as with the para-normal, but there are experiences that cannot be simply dismissed or ridiculed as the easy option when evidence is provided that does not conform to our expectations.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...-x-files-study

Possibly 20 years of Flight Testing may reveal other encounters.....such is the plethora of coincidences....although when the perfect opportunity to itemise types flown in and on arose on here, there was a deafening silence..... so maybe not

Last edited by Krystal n chips; 12th Oct 2018 at 16:55.
Krystal n chips is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2018, 16:58
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 155
The grammar police eh. Pathetic.
No, it’s not pathetic: neither is it grammar. It’s a spelling mistake. We all know that languages change over time, but only due to need or necessity. There are enough problems caused by errant spellcheckers without humans adding to them.
gruntie is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2018, 17:09
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 673
Originally Posted by gruntie View Post


No, itís not pathetic: neither is it grammar. Itís a spelling mistake. We all know that languages change over time, but only due to need or necessity. There are enough problems caused by errant spellcheckers without humans adding to them.
Actually it IS grammar or punctuation, definitely not a spelling mistake. This isnít an English class, and thankfully you are not the teacher.
Stan Woolley is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2018, 17:52
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,624
A rather more scientific approach to alien life can be seen here:

pulse1 is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2018, 18:26
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 673
Originally Posted by pulse1 View Post
A rather more scientific approach to alien life can be seen here:
Perhaps so. Although it doesnít help to explain what happened to Alan Godfrey that night. I donít think Science can swerve such questions for ever. Itís probably very complex, but Iím with K&C.

My old boss recently surprised me, he is not a particularly jovial chap. I happened to mention my interest in such things and he said that heíd seen a ufo more than once, and told me about his experiences. Iíve had other pilots say the same thing, although personally, Iíve not seen anything I can recall as unusual.
Stan Woolley is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2018, 18:39
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: A little south of the "Black Sheep" brewery
Posts: 363
Originally Posted by Stan Woolley View Post


Thanks grunty

The grammar police eh. Pathetic.
If you don't say what you mean accurately, then people won't know what you really mean.

Or did you mean "Fake news before it is time?"
Trossie is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2018, 21:16
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,132
Originally Posted by Stan Woolley View Post

Whatever happened to...Alan Godfrey.
From 2017

https://metro.co.uk/2017/10/17/ex-po...years-7006445/
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2018, 21:44
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 673
Originally Posted by TEEEJ View Post
Thanks for that Teej.

I think heís an honest man that had a strange experience. Good for him sticking to his guns in spite of the cost to his career. Itís sad but no surprise that people donít know how to deal with this type of thing, why does it appear to be so difficult for others to accept? This is exactly why people frequently keep things to themselves for decades, never discussing it with anyone at all.
Stan Woolley is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2018, 23:03
  #16 (permalink)  
Psychophysiological entity
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tweet Rob_Benham Famous author. Well, slightly famous.
Age: 79
Posts: 4,666
Haven't we always had fun picking up on each other's grammar? Let's not spoil the sport.
Loose rivets is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2018, 07:31
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Hampshire
Age: 72
Posts: 676
The thing most people lose sight of when discussing these things is right there in the names used "Unidentified Flying Objects". For me, that describes perfectly what one is seeing and carries no references to aliens, levitating lizards or whatever. Once we accept that, we can devote more time to the grammar, spelling, syntax, type sizes etc!
KelvinD is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2018, 08:01
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 673
Originally Posted by KelvinD View Post
The thing most people lose sight of when discussing these things is right there in the names used "Unidentified Flying Objects". For me, that describes perfectly what one is seeing and carries no references to aliens, levitating lizards or whatever. Once we accept that, we can devote more time to the grammar, spelling, syntax, type sizes etc!
This one wasn’t actually flying at the time of the sighting, so if we’re being pedantic we might call it an ‘unidentified object’. My theory is that some of us just display a sort of unconscious cognitive dissonance when such topics appear, and attempt to deflect from them rather than engage in discussion.

There are many events such as this one. Credible people reporting incredible events. Are we to simply act like chimps covering our eyes and ears and screeching loudly? It appears that this is the preferable choice for some rather than really challenging OURSELVES and questioning rather than attempting to keep things normal by shutting anything we don’t like out of our simplistic worldview.


Stan Woolley is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2018, 08:11
  #19 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 76
Posts: 16,569
Originally Posted by Stan Woolley View Post


Thanks grunty

The grammar police eh. Pathetic.
Don't you mean apathetic?
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2018, 09:28
  #20 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 673
Originally Posted by Pontius Navigator View Post
Don't you mean apathetic?
Possibly so in one way, though they seem to care very deeply about the grammar.

I would argue that there’s a time for wearing your best suit and presenting your best, and there’s a time for slobbing around in your pyjamas at home. The forum lies somewhere between those two imo. ��

Now PLEASE can we get back to discussing Alan ?

Stan Woolley is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.