Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Social > Jet Blast
Reload this Page >

All change at the IPCC

Jet Blast Topics that don't fit the other forums. Rules of Engagement apply.

All change at the IPCC

Old 2nd Mar 2015, 11:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edinburgh and 3C
Age: 66
Posts: 195
All change at the IPCC

I notice, with more than a little frisson of schadenfreude, that Pachauri has fallen on his sword. *

Dr Rajendra Pachauri: the clown of climate change has gone - Telegraph

* Perhaps not a sword; maybe the blade of a wind turbine.
MagnusP is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2015, 12:05
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Not where I want to be
Age: 65
Posts: 191
I notice that the above vitriol was written by Christopher Booker. I bet it made him feel good.
Per
Ancient Mariner is online now  
Old 2nd Mar 2015, 12:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Luberon
Age: 67
Posts: 883
Originally Posted by Ancient Mariner View Post
I notice that the above vitriol was written by Christopher Booker. I bet it made him feel good.
Per
sitigeltfel is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2015, 12:51
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Not where I want to be
Age: 65
Posts: 191
Is Christopher Booker a messenger?
Or should I have written: " the above linked vitriol", since I was certainly not referring to Magnus' post.
Per
Ancient Mariner is online now  
Old 2nd Mar 2015, 13:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,897
It appears that a pork sword is the problem

Anyway, what climate change?

Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2015, 13:12
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edinburgh and 3C
Age: 66
Posts: 195
Per, I'm not a huge fan of Booker either so I take your point. That doesn't change the fact that he has quit after years of criticism from qualified climate scientists and now a sex scandal. Good riddance.
MagnusP is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2015, 14:08
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Asgard
Posts: 487
Ah yes, the former railway engineer with a doctorate in economics....clearly the first choice for chairing a committe concerned with climate issues.
Loki is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2015, 14:11
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,897
Anyone who can give the impression that the Indian railway system works well was clearly the ideal man for promoting the statistical charlatanism of climate modeling.


Reality vs model


and that's after they've altered 'reality' a bit to 'help' the models
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/eart...ndal-ever.html
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2015, 14:14
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 895
qualified climate scientist

Er, wot that?
vulcanised is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2015, 14:21
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edinburgh and 3C
Age: 66
Posts: 195
vulcanised, it's them wot actually do work on climate research (and especially statistical stuff) as opposed to them that are qualified to look at sleepers, lines and signals, but spend their time (and air miles) waving their arms in the air and shouting "Doomed! We're all doomed!".
MagnusP is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2015, 14:42
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 63
Posts: 2,847
Well, here is what NASA has to say on the subject:

The current warming trend is of particular significance because most of it is very likely human-induced and proceeding at a rate that is unprecedented in the past 1,300 years.

Earth-orbiting satellites and other technological advances have enabled scientists to see the big picture, collecting many different types of information about our planet and its climate on a global scale. Studying these climate data collected over many years reveal the signals of a changing climate.

The heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases was demonstrated in the mid-19th century.Their ability to affect the transfer of infrared energy through the atmosphere is the scientific basis of many instruments flown by NASA. There is no question that increased levels of greenhouse gases must cause the Earth to warm in response.

Ice cores drawn from Greenland, Antarctica, and tropical mountain glaciers show that the Earth’s climate responds to changes in greenhouse gas levels. They also show that in the past, large changes in climate have happened very quickly, geologically-speaking: in tens of years, not in millions or even thousands.

The evidence for rapid climate change is compelling:
Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Evidence

Lots of pretty charts there too. Go ahead, and have a look before you respond please.

Last edited by ExXB; 2nd Mar 2015 at 16:52.
ExXB is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2015, 15:09
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,897
Interesting site. They don't appear to have updated their temperature data for over a year. Wonder why not? Perhaps because the global temperature hasn't risen.

From the raw data section of nasa
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/Fig.C.txt

Current temperature anomaly +0.75C.
Temperature anomaly in Feb 1998, 17 years ago, +0.86C
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2015, 15:53
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 59
Posts: 5,239
Fox, all numbers considered, I'd still like to see the temps drop a degree and some of the emissions scaled back.
At the rate coal fired plants are being built, I don't see that happening.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2015, 16:57
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Iraq and other places
Posts: 1,104
It's really cold right now in America, so climate change can't exist.

In other news, liberals claim that the Titanic is sinking; but my end of the boat just lifted 200ft in the air. Stupid liberals, wrong again.
Katamarino is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2015, 16:58
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 63
Posts: 2,847
Fox,
Not going to belabour the point but I'm going to trust NASA long before I'm going to trust the Telegraph.

Who knows why they haven't updated their site. It's either the Republicans or Obama to blame.
ExXB is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2015, 17:18
  #16 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,394
Rather interesting the wording in this quote;

The current warming trend is of particular significance because most of it is very likely human-induced and proceeding at a rate that is unprecedented in the past 1,300 years.

Earth-orbiting satellites and other technological advances have enabled scientists to see the big picture, collecting many different types of information about our planet and its climate on a global scale. Studying these climate data collected over many years reveal the signals of a changing climate.

The heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases was demonstrated in the mid-19th century.Their ability to affect the transfer of infrared energy through the atmosphere is the scientific basis of many instruments flown by NASA. There is no question that increased levels of greenhouse gases must cause the Earth to warm in response.

Ice cores drawn from Greenland, Antarctica, and tropical mountain glaciers show that the Earth’s climate responds to changes in greenhouse gas levels. They also show that in the past, large changes in climate have happened very quickly, geologically-speaking: in tens of years, not in millions or even thousands.

The evidence for rapid climate change is compelling:

So, according to this, rapid changes in the climate have been ongoing well before man showed up.

Interesting.
con-pilot is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2015, 17:25
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,897
I agree about the Telegraph. However, in this case it refers to a blog, which has links at the bottom to....the raw and adjusted nasa data, on a nasa website.

https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.word...south-america/

So I think NASA owe us an explanation as to why the raw data was adjusted, especially since it has happened with several stations, and which have a significant affect on the World model since there are few stations in that area.


More here. It seems all the stations in Paraguay have been adjusted from a downward trend to an upward trend.
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.word...tampered-with/


Must go now - off to teach some real physics!
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2015, 19:50
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Age: 79
Posts: 32
NASA is government funded and as the politicians have decided there is global warming then NASA or any other government funded institution will ensure figures will be produced to echo the politicians views.
Rosevidney1 is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2015, 20:26
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 1,514
I have also noticed that quite often newspapers and other media tend to back the views of advertisers who spend heavily with them, or companies that their patrons have an interest in.

Not much in the world is without an ulterior motive these days
surely not is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2015, 21:27
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 895
I wonder

If all this nonsense, and I believe that's what most of it is, hadn't been foisted on us, with wind farms, restrictions on light bulbs (to take two extreme examples), etc., would any difference be apparent?
vulcanised is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.