Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Social > Jet Blast
Reload this Page >

SpaceX Falcon 9 Live Landing Attempt

Jet Blast Topics that don't fit the other forums. Rules of Engagement apply.

SpaceX Falcon 9 Live Landing Attempt

Old 19th Apr 2018, 09:59
  #101 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 10,390
ORAC is offline  
Old 12th May 2018, 04:32
  #102 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 10,390
https://www.theverge.com/2018/5/11/1...anding-success

This afternoon, SpaceX landed the most powerful version yet of its Falcon 9 rocket, after launching the vehicle from Cape Canaveral, Florida. The so-named Block 5 upgrade took off from the company’s launchpad at Kennedy Space Center, sending a communications satellite into orbit for Bangladesh and then touched down on one of the company’s drone ships in the Atlantic. It was the 25th successful rocket landing for SpaceX, and the 14th on one of the company’s drone ships.

It also marks the first launch of the Block 5, the vehicle that will carry humans to space for NASA. The Block 5 is meant to be SpaceX’s most reusable rocket yet, with many upgrades put in place that negate the need for extensive refurbishment between flights. In fact, the first Block 5 rockets will eventually be able to fly up to 10 times without the need for any maintenance after landings, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk said during a pre-launch press conference. Ideally, once one of these rocket lands, SpaceX will turn it horizontal, attach a new upper stage and nose cone on top, turn it vertical on the launchpad, fill it with propellant, and then launch it again. Musk noted that the vehicles would need some kind of moderate maintenance after the 10-flight mark, but it’s possible that each rocket could fly up to 100 times in total.It’ll be a while before SpaceX is that efficient, though. Since this is the first launch and landing of the Block 5, the company will still deconstruct the vehicle and do inspections to see if it can indeed fly again without refurbishment. “Ironically, we need to take it apart to confirm that it does not need to be taken apart,” Musk said. He noted that this particular rocket probably won’t fly again for a couple months......

Not only is the Block 5 more equipped for reuse, but it’s also got much more power than its predecessors. The main Merlin engines at the bottom of the rocket have 8 percent more thrust than before, and Musk thinks there’s more room for improvement. “The thrust we’re getting is truly incredible at this point,” he said. Meanwhile, the Merlin engine in the upper stage of the rocket — the one that operates in the vacuum of space — has 5 percent more thrust than before.

The Block 5 is also the rocket that SpaceX will use to send astronauts to the International Space Station, as part of NASA’s Commercial Crew Program. In order to make the vehicle certified for carrying humans, SpaceX had to make a huge number of improvements to the rocket’s design. “There are thousands and thousands and thousands of requirements,” Musk said. For one, the rocket has to be able to handle more loads during launch and it has to have a much higher tolerance for small failures. In other words, if a few things go wrong during flight, the rocket will be okay. Musk noted that a few engines could go out on this vehicle and the Falcon 9 would still be able to make it to orbit. But just to be safe, NASA is requiring that SpaceX fly the Block 5 at least seven times, without making any major changes to the rocket, before people can ride on it......

SpaceX doesn’t intend to make any major revisions to the Block 5, though, save for small changes to improve flight reliability and reusability. The company will likely have between 30 to 50 Block 5 rockets in rotation at some point, according to Musk. The number depends on which customers insist on flying satellites on a new vehicle, though he’s hoping the mentality on used rockets will change in the coming years. “The general sentiment will change from... feeling like, ‘A flown rocket is scary,’ to ‘An unflown rocket is scary,’” Musk said.

But the goal is to ultimately close the gap on the Falcon 9’s turnaround time between flights. Musk says that to show the true power of the Block 5, SpaceX plans to launch the same rocket twice within a 24-hour period sometime next year.......





Last edited by ORAC; 12th May 2018 at 04:46.
ORAC is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2018, 09:07
  #103 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 10,390
SpaceX sent a cargo spacecraft skyward early Friday (June 29) during a dazzling predawn liftoff that showcased the company's considerable reusability chops.

A two-stage SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket lit up the early-morning Florida sky as it launched the company's robotic Dragon capsule toward the International Space Station (ISS) on a delivery mission for NASA at 5:42 a.m. EDT (0942 GMT) from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. The Dragon will arrive at the space station early Monday (July 2). The liftoff was the second for both the Dragon and the Falcon 9's first stage; the capsule previously visited the ISS in July 2016, and the booster helped launch NASA's Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite this past April. The 10-week turnaround was the shortest ever for a landed and relaunched SpaceX first stage, company representatives said.

SpaceX did not attempt today to land the booster for a second time. The booster is a "Block 4" Falcon 9 variant, which SpaceX is phasing out in favor of the recently debuted "Block 5." So, the company surrendered the first stage to the ocean. In fact, today marked the last-ever flight of a Block 4 Falcon 9, SpaceX representatives said......

ORAC is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2018, 10:24
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Florida
Age: 48
Posts: 411
This was the most spectacular launch to watch to date. Once we'd got over the initial shock of being woken up by it, we went out to the front porch. The atmospheric conditions made the exhaust plume an amazing sight. As it was twilight you could see it for a long time. Kind of interesting that eventually you lost sight of it as it went below the tree line.
vaqueroaero is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2018, 11:24
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 1,494
Originally Posted by ORAC View Post

SpaceX did not attempt today to land the booster for a second time. The booster is a "Block 4" Falcon 9 variant, which SpaceX is phasing out in favor of the recently debuted "Block 5." So, the company surrendered the first stage to the ocean.
Given that spaceX can recover this type of booster flying this sort of profile and have chosen not to ... can they be sued for littering the ocean 🤨.
Daysleeper is online now  
Old 30th Jun 2018, 15:39
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: apogee
Age: 65
Posts: 59
At least it's not plastic and sinks unlike all the plastic faux-fish food the oceans are awash with.
meadowrun is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2018, 15:46
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Balikpapan, INDONESIA
Age: 67
Posts: 535
Originally Posted by Daysleeper View Post
Given that spaceX can recover this type of booster flying this sort of profile and have chosen not to ... can they be sued for littering the ocean ��.
I am sure that the owners of the ocean could do just that. The same way that they sue everyone else for the copious amounts of crap that gets dispatched over the side.

As well as the owners of every non-Space-X booster ever launched - Russians excepted. I think Kazakhstan wears all that crap.
WingNut60 is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2018, 17:53
  #108 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 10,390
And the Chinese - several accidents with both stage one failure and boosters landing on villages.
ORAC is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2018, 22:37
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 55
Posts: 2,755
Elon Musk announces the first paying passenger on the Big F***** Rocket!

Jesus that thing's big.

https://www.spacex.com/webcast

From about 22 minutes in.
TURIN is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 09:28
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 55
Posts: 2,755
Freefall re-entry and approach.

BFR Landing Technique
TURIN is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2018, 16:47
  #111 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 10,390
Amazing landing in the circumstances - and Spacex reporting the rocket is still in good condition and available for possible reuse.

https://www.firstpost.com/tech/scien...y-5696071.html




ORAC is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2019, 19:11
  #112 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 10,390
https://www.sciencealert.com/elon-mu...e-for-the-moon

Elon Musk Has Shared Jaw-Dropping Images of The Latest 'Starship' Tests
ORAC is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2019, 07:48
  #113 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 10,390
https://www.theverge.com/2019/2/22/1...-1-test-flight

NASA gives SpaceX the okay to launch new passenger spacecraft on uncrewed test flight

Crew Dragon’s first flight is a week away

https://www.inverse.com/article/5350...y-heating-ever

SpaceX’s Falcon 9 Just Survived Its Highest Reentry Heating Ever

SpaceX has completed one of its most challenging missions yet. The company launched what may become the world’s first privately-owned lunar landertoward the surface of the moon on Thursday, before successfully landing the Falcon 9 rocket with the highest reentry heating ever. The rocket took off from Launch Complex 40 at the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida at 8:45 p.m. Eastern as scheduled, landing eight minutes and 48 seconds later.

The landing marks another successful milestone for SpaceX, which aims to refine its landing technology to save more rockets and reduce costs further. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk noted that the company’s video feed showed burning metal sparks, while manufacturing engineer Jessie Anderson said during the feed that the landing on the Of Course I Still Love You droneship was completed despite “challenging conditions.” The mission was the third for the rocket in question, a “Block 5” core dubbed “B1048” that previously flew on the July 25 Iridium NEXT-7and the October 8 SAOCOM 1A missions last year.

ORAC is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2019, 18:33
  #114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 2,761
And how many Indian villages could have received a sewerage plant for the cost of sending a washing machine to the moon?
Ascend Charlie is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2019, 18:46
  #115 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 10,390
And why would, or should, a privately funded Israeli company pay for washing machines, or sewerage plants, in India?
ORAC is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2019, 20:29
  #116 (permalink)  
Tabs please !
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Biffins Bridge
Posts: 715
Originally Posted by Ascend Charlie View Post
And how many Indian villages could have received a sewerage plant for the cost of sending a washing machine to the moon?
A question best put to the director of the Indian space programme.

https://phys.org/news/2019-01-india-...-december.html
B Fraser is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2019, 10:22
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 2,761
Well, that's what you get for typing with a skinful, and not seeing that the spell-checker had changed the garble of letters meant to say Israel into India.

Bluddy tecknollergy!
Ascend Charlie is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2019, 12:34
  #118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: England
Posts: 643
You are being very shortsighted.

The Moon is a very dusty place. If people are going to live there they will need a washing machine.
keith williams is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2019, 18:29
  #119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: California
Posts: 287
Originally Posted by B Fraser View Post
A question best put to the director of the Indian space programme.

https://phys.org/news/2019-01-india-...-december.html
Many years ago I sold some electronic equipment to ISRO. But they had trouble using it as they only had power for 6 hours per day.
MarcK is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2019, 19:47
  #120 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 10,390
ORAC is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.