Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Social > Jet Blast
Reload this Page >

A USA gun thread. That won't be controversial, will it?

Jet Blast Topics that don't fit the other forums. Rules of Engagement apply.

A USA gun thread. That won't be controversial, will it?

Old 28th Oct 2014, 22:08
  #361 (permalink)  
Dushan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by John Hill View Post
I thought you might enjoy reading it!
And don't forget the other one, over which we send copious amounts of snow, ice, and cold, just for RGB.
 
Old 28th Oct 2014, 22:11
  #362 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A place so nice, they named it twice
Posts: 98
Oh dear, supposition again
Most of those hold ups were with replicas.
Care to give some actual data on that one Smurf?
gupta is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2014, 22:15
  #363 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: egsh
Posts: 415
If you get caught that is, good chance you will not.
Odds are better than at Logan, then?
wings folded is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2014, 22:21
  #364 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 73
Posts: 2,395
Odds are better than at Logan, then?
Anyplace is better than Boston Logan, even when in a corporate jet.

Trust me on this.
con-pilot is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2014, 22:35
  #365 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: CYZV
Age: 73
Posts: 1,259
And don't forget the other one, over which we send copious amounts of snow, ice, and cold, just for RGB.
And here's a warm-up pitch.

pigboat is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2014, 22:51
  #366 (permalink)  
Hardly Never Not Unwilling
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 481
Thanks for the statistical graphing, PTT. Very nicely done and presented.

One thing I've been saying all along is that the America I live in is as safe as anywhere, and I contend that fact is cultural, fortified by the fact that my America is also legally, heavily armed to keep it that way.

Our Democrat-run urban nightmares are violent hell-holes. The thugs have guns, are constantly searching for prey, and many decent people are caught up in it and can't afford to escape. They have the additional burden of gun control. That's how it is. Yet they keep voting for the same Democrats. It's a conundrum to me.
BenThere is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2014, 01:06
  #367 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 67
Posts: 3,332
PTT,

Those charts do not indicate that the hand gun ban did the square root of squat to violence or illegal gun use. And, if it was so effective, why is the rates so much higher than the '70s rates.

US murder rates have been cut in half since "shall issue" laws made gun carriage more accessible here.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2014, 04:20
  #368 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: E.Wash State
Posts: 618
Originally Posted by galaxy flyer View Post
PTT,

US murder rates have been cut in half since "shall issue" laws made gun carriage more accessible here.
No, no GF, murder rates are down because of the effective 12-step programs the government has run to re-educate those misguided youth of our inner cities. And the job training programs to turn drug sellers into 4-star chefs.
obgraham is online now  
Old 29th Oct 2014, 05:22
  #369 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Scotland
Age: 76
Posts: 452
I note with amusement Dushans comment regarding Channel Islands border guards. A few guards with handguns would really have made a big difference to the German invasion - would have scared the Wehrmacht shitless. If you want to prove a point use a credible argument,most of the readers here are reasonably intelligent.
bcgallacher is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2014, 07:29
  #370 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,672
nice try. The statistics were provided by the British Home Office. Not exactly a US-operated pro-gun website, eh?
No, they were supposedly taken from the British Home Office ... but they were massaged into a graph and other information presented on a pro-gun, US operated website, so quite frankly I'm going to take any information from there with a very large pinch of salt. At the very best it is trying to make mountains out of molehills.

You know you're just digging yourself into a large hole by trying to say the UK has a gun problem. It doesn't, I know you know that. The only place with a gun problem is the US, the rest of the world can see that, only the Americans can't ! The US has had a school shooting almost every single month for god knows how many years ! How many school shootings in the UK ? Hell, how many people in the UK have been slaughtered at schools using other weapons ? Exactly ..... the US is the place that has the problems, not the UK.

Stop clutching at your straws and admit your country has a problem that needs to be dealt with. Throwing more guns at the problem is not going to help, nor is refusing to impose any restrictions or checks on gun ownership.
mixture is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2014, 07:50
  #371 (permalink)  
PTT
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 441
galaxy flyer - I don't believe I said anything was down to a handgun ban. All I said was that I would be interested in knowing how many in that peak between ~'98 and ~'08 were offences of possession which would not otherwise have been offences before the ban. Only then can we know what the actual crime rate was. The "homicides committed" chart gives us a clue, because it is (very) roughly the same shape as the offences chart, but I'd want more than an eyeballing of two different charts to start trying to draw any conclusions.
As for comparison with the '70s, that kind of thing is dependent on worldwide trends as well. Are guns generally more available, cheaper etc, and is the change slower in the UK than elsewhere. You can't draw such conclusions from one chart.
US murder rates have been cut in half since "shall issue" laws made gun carriage more accessible here.
Have you got some data for that assertion at all?

BenThere - you're welcome. The data says what the data says.
the America I live in is as safe as anywhere
What do you mean by "the America [you] live in"?
PTT is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2014, 08:13
  #372 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,960
Originally Posted by John Hill
I think it's...
Source, please.
Hempy is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2014, 08:18
  #373 (permalink)  

More than just an ATCO
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Up someone's nose
Age: 71
Posts: 1,768
Lon More is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2014, 09:16
  #374 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Zealand
Age: 73
Posts: 508
Hempy, it is attributed to Ed Chenel, an Australian police officer.

¡Sq ,sɹǝlpuoɟ unƃ llɐ sᴉ ʇᴉ ʞuᴉɥʇ I ʇnq
John Hill is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2014, 12:00
  #375 (permalink)  
Hardly Never Not Unwilling
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 481
What do you mean by "the America [you] live in"?
It's typical America.

I live in an outer ring suburb of Detroit. Every large American city has suburbs like mine, where people moved to escape the rot of the inner city.

It's prosperous, working class, safe. People of all backgrounds and races want to, and do, live here. Canton votes Republican. I lifted these demographics from wiki:

The U.S. Census Bureau also defined Canton Township as a census-designated place (CDP) at the 2000 Census so that the community would appear on the list of places (like cities and villages) as well on the list of county subdivisions (like other townships). The final statistics for the township and the CDP were identical.

As of the census[1] of 2010, there were 90,173 people, 32,771 households, and 24,231 families residing in the township. The population density was 2,121.5 per square mile (819.0/km²). There were 34,829 housing units at an average density of 789.8 per square mile (304.9/km²). The racial makeup of the township was 72.2% White, 10.2% African American, 0.2% Native American, 14.1% Asian (8.0% Indian, 2.2% Chinese, 0.7% Filipino, 0.4% Korean, 0.3% Japanese, 0.3% Vietnamese, 2.2% Other Asian), 0.0% Pacific Islander, 0.7% from other races, and 1.91% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 3.1% of the population.

There were 27,490 households out of which 42.0% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 63.4% were married couples living together, 8.6% had a female householder with no husband present, and 25.2% were non-families. 20.5% of all households were made up of individuals and 4.8% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.77 and the average family size was 3.26. The median household price was $239,900 according to the U.S. Census Bureau's 2006 American Community Survey estimates.[19]

In the township the population was spread out with 29.0% under the age of 18, 8.0% from 18 to 24, 34.9% from 25 to 44, 22.1% from 45 to 64, and 5.9% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 33 years. For every 100 females there were 98.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.2 males.

According to a 2007 estimate, the median income for a household in the township was $82,669, and the median income for a family was $95,267.[20] Males had a median income of $61,570 versus $35,615 for females. The per capita income for the township was $28,609. About 2.9% of families and 3.7% of the population were below the poverty line, including 4.2% of those under age 18 and 5.5% of those age 65 or over.
Canton Township, MI - Official Website | Official Website
BenThere is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2014, 12:07
  #376 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Patterson, NY
Age: 62
Posts: 436
mixture wrote:

The only place with a gun problem is the US, the rest of the world can see that, only the Americans can't !
The US has a gun problem? that's odd because I have no problem at all in adding to my growing arsenal. I wonder why that might be?
rgbrock1 is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2014, 12:40
  #377 (permalink)  

More than just an ATCO
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Up someone's nose
Age: 71
Posts: 1,768


the ultimate private weapon, it's not rocket science
Lon More is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2014, 12:43
  #378 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Perth Western Australia
Age: 53
Posts: 808
the ultimate private weapon, it's not rocket science
Actually I was implying that somewhere, whats the limit? And if you can limit some, why not others? Silence
rh200 is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2014, 12:54
  #379 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Age: 56
Posts: 664
The limit?

Philosophically, there shouldn't be one.

Practically, the "reasonable man" theory would be my argument.

Unfortunately, we have reached the stage where common sense is defined differently.

If I harm you, I should be punished is one camp.

If I don't harm you, but I possess something you don't like, you should be able to punish me, is the other camp.

And the lawyers get rich because of it.

Bottom line, my nation's foundational document gave a list of inherent rights that exist simply because I do as an American citizen.

The resulting government formed FROM that agreement and resulting document does not have the jurisdiction to remove any of those inherent rights unless I do something to abrogate my possession of those rights.

That same agreement and foundation provides a means whereby the American citizens can alter the contract should they deem it necessary.

After 230+ years, those inherent rights remain untouched.

Despite attempts by power-hungry control freaks to make it otherwise.

A good deal of common sense and insight into human behavior by those Founding Fathers.
brickhistory is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2014, 12:58
  #380 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Patterson, NY
Age: 62
Posts: 436
Common sense? Founding fathers? Oh, and so much more.

rgbrock1 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.