Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Social > Jet Blast
Reload this Page >

A lot of Bullsh*t to rip people off

Jet Blast Topics that don't fit the other forums. Rules of Engagement apply.

A lot of Bullsh*t to rip people off

Old 30th Jun 2001, 11:40
  #1 (permalink)  
golden_hands
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Angry A lot of Bullsh*t to rip people off

Airport passengers can pay extra tax to combat global warming

Passengers at Luton Airport are being asked to pay a "green tax" to help combat global warming caused by aircraft emissions.

People flying from the airport can contribute 0.2p per mile to help fund a tree planting programme around the town. The trees will soak up carbon dioxide pumped out of planes.

The optional levy works out at around 69p on a flight to Edinburgh and £3.60 for a journey to Tenerife.

Future Forests, the group organising the tree planting, said the scheme was a step forward in cutting greenhouse gases created by airlines.

Chief executive Jonathan Shopley said: "Many people heading off for a summer holiday are probably not aware that they are contributing to global warming.

"This will bring it home to them and enable them to take action. If they pay the extra money trees will be planted that will neutralise the carbon dioxide emissions and leave an environmentally friendly flight."

He said aviation urgently needed to address the problem of global warming.

"Airlines are pumping out around 2% of carbon dioxide emissions, and with the industry growing rapidly we expect their emissions to increase by around 3% each year," he continued.

Dr Mark McLellan, head of environment at the airport, said the three-month scheme would be consumer led.

"Some people are prepared to pay more for organic food, some people pay more for recycled goods and we believe some people will pay more for carbon neutral flights. It is entirely up to passengers to decide if they want to pay, but we believe about half will."

This is a post on the Ananova website. Virtual nonsense!
 
Old 30th Jun 2001, 20:29
  #2 (permalink)  
Squawk 8888
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size="2">Many people heading off for a summer holiday are probably not aware that they are contributing to global warming.</font>
No doubt because they aren't. The greenhouse theory has been so thoroughly debunked over the past few years that the only people who still believe it are politicians and enviro-luddite activists.

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size="2">Airlines are pumping out around 2% of carbon dioxide emissions, and with the industry growing rapidly we expect their emissions to increase by around 3% each year</font>
A drop in the bucket compared to what is exhaled by humans & animals.

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size="2">Some people are prepared to pay more for organic food,</font>
Thanks to the scaremongering campaigns put on by friends of the organic food industry. A classic scam- convince enough well-fed yuppies that modern food production is bad for their health and the environment, then rake in the cash as they pay a premium for products that are even worse for the environment (deforestation, soil depletion, obsolete pesticides that must be used in larger quantities) and ten times as likely to make them ill (e. coli from raw manure dumped on crops).

BTW did you get a chance to see Tampering with Nature on ABC last night? Terrific exposť of the green lobby!

------------------
Per dementia ad astra
 
Old 30th Jun 2001, 21:16
  #3 (permalink)  
pigboat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

The Supreme Court of Canada has just ruled that municipalities have the right to ban pesticide use in this country, even though they are legal and provincial and federal regulations allow their application. Apparently, some municipalies will allow the application of organic pesticides.
Organic pesticides are, in great measure, nicotine based, and are up to fifteen times more toxic to humans than the malathion they are to replace.
Another fine example of the Supremes removing their collective heads from their collective a***s to hand down a decision with no basis in reality.
 
Old 30th Jun 2001, 21:19
  #4 (permalink)  
Big Red ' L '
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

So what if you don't want to pay it..?
 
Old 1st Jul 2001, 05:20
  #5 (permalink)  
Squawk 8888
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Heard about that, pigboat. That's our wonderful government for you- making the world safe for allergens and disease vectors everywhere. So if I catch West Nile or Malaria, can I sue the local council?

------------------
Per dementia ad astra
 
Old 1st Jul 2001, 11:45
  #6 (permalink)  
OzExpat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

Lemme see if I understand this correctly? This "green" tax is supposed to make each flight environmentally friendly? So, does this mean the engines magically stop producing this 'orrble carbon dioxide stuff as soon as the aircraft is out of the Luton area?

Geez, innt that amaaazing!!!

------------------
Dispela olgeta samting i pekpek bilong bulmakau!
 
Old 1st Jul 2001, 12:02
  #7 (permalink)  
golden_hands
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wink

Well Big Red you'll never get an upgrade and will be banned to the last row forever until you pay!!!!
 
Old 1st Jul 2001, 14:27
  #8 (permalink)  
Velvet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Red face

Well, if the situation in the Balearics worsens, then I don't think people will have to worry about planes spreading pollution - they won't be going anywhere.

However, I'm flying out of Luton on Friday - so I'll be interested in their explanation. I think they'd have done better to state it was to make Luton more attractive - one of the ugliest airports anyhere.

 
Old 1st Jul 2001, 16:24
  #9 (permalink)  
Islander Jock
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I might suggest that although the notion of a green tax seems a little far fetched at the moment, do not be overconfident that it, or something similar will not happen.

After all, it wasn't so long ago that the suggestion of a noise tax to compensate those who brought houses under the approach to YSSY was first mooted.
 
Old 1st Jul 2001, 16:55
  #10 (permalink)  
Velvet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

Oh no, Islander Jock, ssssssshhhhh

 
Old 1st Jul 2001, 18:43
  #11 (permalink)  
golden_hands
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Lightbulb

Maybe they can use the noise tax to demolish those houses and move the noise sensitive weasels somewhere else. Somewhere in the Sahara nice and quiet and lovely weather!
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.