Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Wannabes Forums > Interviews, jobs & sponsorship
Reload this Page >

Recent MCC/JOC experience

Wikiposts
Search
Interviews, jobs & sponsorship The forum where interviews, job offers and selection criteria can be discussed and exchanged.

Recent MCC/JOC experience

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th May 2018, 16:12
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: spain
Age: 34
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sound strange to me. I'm curious if this source is a wannabe or something more reliable like an airline assessor.
I know that Simtech is still one of the best Mcc provider in Europe. Do you think their quality is dropped because their students dont pass assessment?
The sim they have is quite good for an mcc, mcc is not a type rating.
oldkarim is offline  
Old 5th May 2018, 19:13
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: spain
Age: 34
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skyhigh_
I don't really know any wannabes.....I just think you should choose a place where they have a modern SIM which would drastically improve your chances to pass any airline assessments
You should know that a low hour pilot is not assessed on his flying skill on a 737, it does not make any sense, but how he works in a multi crew enviroment. A generic sim for a mcc training is more then enough. Then if you want to feel more relaxed at the assessment you can still book mcc refresh on a 737 or 320, but I think that the simtech sim is quite good for an mcc.
oldkarim is offline  
Old 7th May 2018, 11:56
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've had two SIM assessments with airlines one went well the other not so well. I'm lucky that I'm friends with a 737 TRE so could do SIM preparation for the second assessment. In both assessments they were mostly looking at rudder and stick skills i.e basic hand flying, pitch power couples (when accelerating / decelerating), raw data VOR tracking and ILS.
An awareness of threat and error management with CRM skills (NITS/DODAR) were needed but it was the flying skills they were mostly looking for. You can read up about NITS, DODAR, briefings and TEM fairly easily but flying an expensive SIM is not that easy.

I went to Virtual Aviation for a look around with my mate who was really impressed with them. He told me to go to VA but I was (wrongly) convinced it was the Multi Crew skills that were assessed in any future sim assessments more than the hand flying, so I went to a more reasonably priced one - saving £4000. I probably wouldn't have failed my first assessment if I had 40hrs on a 737 SIM and why I didn't take the advice of someone who runs airline SIM assessments I don't know.....
I understand you can now do a JOC/MCC on a A320 sim at VA - I personally would avoid this because if your Airline assessment is in a 737 you won't be prepared for the trimming etc.

I don't regret going to my MCC/JOC provider - the training itself was excellent but the basic SIM didn't really prepare me at all for an airline assessment, if I hadn't spent time in a fairly cheap 737 NG SIM with my mate I'd have failed both assessments. I used Airavana.co.uk at £55 per hour, its not a FFS but my mate said it was pretty realistic and good enough for what I needed.

Now theres the new APS MCC/JOC course I think its worth spending that bit more on a course to firstly get your foot in the door and then increase your chances of success at a future assessment. Whether that's with VA or another provider I can't say.
Danskora is offline  
Old 7th May 2018, 14:21
  #24 (permalink)  

de minimus non curat lex
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: sunny troon
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by oldkarim
You should know that a low hour pilot is not assessed on his flying skill on a 737, it does not make any sense, but how he works in a multi crew enviroment. A generic sim for a mcc training is more then enough. Then if you want to feel more relaxed at the assessment you can still book mcc refresh on a 737 or 320, but I think that the simtech sim is quite good for an mcc.
Whilst OLDKARIM is quite correct about the importance of CRM in the multi crew environment, your flying skills do most certainly form a critical part of any sim assessment.
In particular your ability to fly a RAW DATA ILS to DA (successfully) will undoubtedly be part of any assessment.
It is critical that you are proficient in this item, together with the ability to TRIM accurately.
Set the known thrust/power; set the known attitude; and then TRIM. Get it to stay on rails, and release the rest of your grey matter for other tasks ~ capacity to name but one.
parkfell is offline  
Old 7th May 2018, 17:27
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skyhigh_
Yes people say they do a really good course at Virtual Aviation, Sky4U, Kura, Oxford, L3, Epst. I would avoid Simtech, old Sim (nowhere near a 737) and I heard their pass rate at airline assessments has dropped quite a lot.
Where do KURA have their sim? What type is it?
uncle dickie is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2018, 11:22
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Italy
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi, everyone! I need some info about Virtual Aviation. Could someone help me?
cavosky is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2018, 21:53
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try their website, or better still give them a ring?
uncle dickie is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2018, 14:46
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cavosky
Hi, everyone! I need some info about Virtual Aviation. Could someone help me?
If you ask for info about something, please state then in clear points what you want to know to make your question more specific Cavosky.

For example:
1

2

3

4

Then you could expect better answers.
P40Warhawk is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2018, 08:32
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Italy
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok,
I want some more info about their APS MCC program, their final test and also the initial test. It would be nice also to know about their connections and help in finding a job after.
cavosky is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2018, 16:32
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cavosky
Ok,
I want some more info about their APS MCC program, their final test and also the initial test. It would be nice also to know about their connections and help in finding a job after.
Myself I did not go there, but now we know what you want to know .
P40Warhawk is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2018, 04:50
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Yes
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi everyone!

Currently im under frozen ATPL training! Hopefully going to finish with the exams at the end of the summer.
After finishing it I would like to do the MCC/JOC part as soon as possible in Europe. If anyone could help me tips and advices pls. Reviewing the posts the pilots mostly said the Simtech(but the recent post did not say too much good), Cocki4u, VA.
I read about the Cardiff Aviation with the FFS 747, or BAA seems ok too. Cardiff has quick course and normal, which has time difference but for example the Wizz requests the full 16 hours course. Anyone about this? Is that really important to do these on a FFS or doing these on a FNPT is just fine? Could you tell me the big difference between these? I know the FFS moves like the real one and FNPT is fixed, im looking for answer which could describe me for example the handling difference, little things etc.
Like everyone else I have the same dilemma: doing it on an Airbus, or Boeing? Finishing the courses on the bus and later applying for a RYR sim check? How did you solve this problem? After the airbus paying for a fixed Boeing sim XXeuro/hour in a plaza?
Im not rich, but i would like to pay for the quality of the training. I can not afford the CAE which works double (or triple) than the other organisations. Are they really good for that money, are they really the best? Hmm..

Anyway, I am happy to read your answers, tips and advices.
Thank you, Good day!
nnanR is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2018, 20:55
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Cannes
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did firstly MCC in BAA and then JOC in SKY4u. Vilnius is perfect city but I would prefer to do both MCC and JOC in Berlin
RomanK is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2018, 05:33
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree, done JOC in Sky4U. If I had info about them before I would do there MCC as well.
nebojsar is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2018, 02:33
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Yes
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you for your quick answers. I check the Sky4u but I found Sim4u and Cockpit4u as well based in Berlin. What are the differences between them? I found that the Sky4U uses the Sim4U simulators but i can not find how the Cockpit4u is related to the previous two. Cockpit4u has a training centre in Frankfurt that is a bit better for me than Berlin(distance).
nnanR is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2018, 04:51
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Yes
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skyhigh_
As far as I know Cockpit4u has nothing to do with Sky4u, they are 2 separate companies however, you are correct in saying that Sky4u uses the Sim4U simulators. I had very good feedback from people who went to Sky4u.
Thank you for your answer. Do you have any information about the Cockpit4U organisation?
nnanR is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2018, 06:45
  #36 (permalink)  

de minimus non curat lex
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: sunny troon
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just be aware that EASA has a higher MCC qualification ~ APSMCC (GM3 FCL735.A) which formalises the jet training element of JOC. It may well be that a good provider will already cover all the elements, but their Regulator needs to approve their APS MCC course before a new style certificate is issued.
For the avoidance of doubt, the APSMCC course is not just an attendance course. There is a minimum standard required for APSMCC certification. For those who unfortunately do not meet the standard, they will be issued with a MCC (only) certificate. Hardly a ringing endorsement when the provider is APSMCC approved.
Those who achieve a marginal pass will still struggle on the sim ride. At present the APSMCC course is a PASS/FAIL situation, although grading occurs during all the exercises. Might be worthwhile keeping a copy?

Ryanair amongst others look more favourably on this new qualification when inviting you commence their selection process. Still the need to demonstrate to any employer that you know your stuff.
parkfell is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2018, 05:23
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Yes
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by parkfell
Just be aware that EASA has a higher MCC qualification ~ APSMCC (GM3 FCL735.A) which formalises the jet training element of JOC. It may well be that a good provider will already cover all the elements, but their Regulator needs to approve their APS MCC course before a new style certificate is issued.
For the avoidance of doubt, the APSMCC course is not just an attendance course. There is a minimum standard required for APSMCC certification. For those who unfortunately do not meet the standard, they will be issued with a MCC (only) certificate. Hardly a ringing endorsement when the provider is APSMCC approved.
Those who achieve a marginal pass will still struggle on the sim ride. At present the APSMCC course is a PASS/FAIL situation, although grading occurs during all the exercises. Might be worthwhile keeping a copy?

Ryanair amongst others look more favourably on this new qualification when inviting you commence their selection process. Still the need to demonstrate to any employer that you know your stuff.
I did not know that.. which organisation would you recommend? Unfortunetaly I can not afford CAE or the other expensive schools.
nnanR is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2018, 18:54
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: holding short of....
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can do/get invited for RYR interview without the MCC (as long as you get it before the TR) no JOC was requested/needed during the interview.
Do not spend more than 5k.
Airgus is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2018, 18:57
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nnanR
I did not know that.. which organisation would you recommend? Unfortunetaly I can not afford CAE or the other expensive schools.
You need to read through the threads for this topic and you will find the answer you seek.
If you cannot afford a reputable provider, STOP now, as you will not afford the type course !
uncle dickie is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2018, 20:30
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Airgus
You can do/get invited for RYR interview without the MCC (as long as you get it before the TR) no JOC was requested/needed during the interview.
Do not spend more than 5k.
Whilst AIRGUS is quite correct in what he says, the chances of being successful at Ryanair without first completing a MCC is probably less than 5%. The assessors have nothing worth assessing. The exception would be an ex military multi transport pilot.

Unless you have some multi crew experience (MCC) you are probably wasting your time & your hard earned money.
Ask those who have completed a MCC course before accepting AIRGUS advice.
uncle dickie is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.