Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Wannabes Forums > Interviews, jobs & sponsorship
Reload this Page >

Is integrated training necessary for airline employment?

Interviews, jobs & sponsorship The forum where interviews, job offers and selection criteria can be discussed and exchanged.

Is integrated training necessary for airline employment?

Old 27th Apr 2014, 19:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Bristol
Age: 36
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Is integrated training necessary for airline employment?

Hello all,

I would really, really like to become an airline pilot. At the moment I am studying towards my PPL with a small flying club. Unfortunately, I am not in a position to afford to train full-time with the likes of CTC Wings, Oxford Aviation, etc. My question is: Do people who train part time, doing each licence as they go along, have just as much chance of becoming an airline pilot as those that are able to do a full-time, integrated programme? I ask this question because I am really scared that I am going to do all this training and end up jobless. I'm working 7 days a week at the moment and plan to do so for the next couple of years to make this dream happen. I'd be gutted if I got all my licenses and ended up with no job so would appreciate any feedback you can offer.

Many thanks in advance.
Dan4267 is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2014, 20:04
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: London
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is integrated training necessary for airline employment?

Everyone has their own opinion on this and you will find extensive info in modular vs integrated thread with hundreds of posts.

Basic 2 camps are:

Integrated: airline approach, more likely to get a shot at an airline interview due to links/exclusivity with airline hr departments (contested).

Modular: significantly cheaper, money saved can be used for type rating / further training.

Everyone has their own opinion and no one can give you a definitive answer. I suggest putting the kettle on, and sitting down with the thread then drawing your own conclusions. Good luck!
Straighten Up is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2014, 20:12
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Dan

Welcome to PPrune.

I think this question has been discussed at great length on this forum already, and many will tell you different things based entirely on their own experiences. Here's my opinion for what it's worth.

Personally I doubt you have an equal chance of getting into an airline by going the modular route over the integrated route (which is what you're talking about). That's not to say that it can't be done, because it can; and people do. But I imagine there are far more guys at the front of commercial jets who went the integrated route than the modular route. However, I stand to be corrected if anyone can supply evidence to the contrary.

If a jet job is really what you want then you might be interested in some of the tagged schemes that are on the go at the moment? For instance, the Easyjet MPL has just launched (although it would appear that you'd have to raise the capital yourself for that one). Alternatively the BA FPP should open again later in the year, and you could take advantage of the BA guaranteed loan scheme to fund your training via that route.

In any case, if you love flying then you should keep doing the PPL. It'll be a solid first step prior to going down either route, and a great deal of fun too.
Good luck whichever way you go!
G-F0RC3 is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2014, 20:56
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Bristol
Age: 36
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, can I just say a really big thank you! I've never been one for forums, in part due to their general negativity. However, I am amazed by how thoughtful and detailed your responses are. I really appreciate your feedback. Of course I would welcome others opinion as well, but I just had to say thanks as I'm genuinely surprised. I'll keep waiting for a little bit to see what others post and reply later after taking on board everyone's comments.
Dan4267 is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2014, 23:36
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Crew hotel
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Integrated courses show airlines you can absorb x amount of material in a defined period of time... If you complete the same course content as a modular student over 5 years, what have you really proven? Will you take 5 times longer to complete a type rating if they hire you?

If you can do the modular route full time over 12-18 months with just the one training provider, and save yourself 25%, then do that. And don't put on your cv whether you're modular/integrated...

As you've already mentioned, many airlines are using the likes of CTC for their low hour cadet requirements. You could write a list of airlines who take on independent unaffiliated cadets... I can't think of any off the top of my head.

Once past your first airline job, all of this becomes irrelevant. They just want to see a license and verified stamped logbook. But always stay current on type, whatever stage you are at. Enjoy the journey!
777X is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2014, 00:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My question is: Do people who train part time, doing each licence as they go along, have just as much chance of becoming an airline pilot as those that are able to do a full-time, integrated programme?
The simple answer is that very, very, few airlines are interested in people with fresh licences and two hundred odd hours. They aren't now and they never have been. The exception to this is those airlines that have cadet programmes as part of their recruitment intake. Most of those airlines contract with one or more training schools to provide the basic and intermediate portions of that ab-initio training. The successful graduates then complete their advanced training with the partner airline. Of course the basic and intermediate training is full time, integrated and specific to a small handful of training schools.

Beyond these cadet programmes, you can work your way up through career advancement. Many people over the years have worked as flying instructors and in general aviation, and then made their way up through the "stepping stone" jobs and second and third tier commercial operators until they have the broad brush experience that the first tier airlines generally stipulate as a minimum for direct entry recruitment. Those figures vary from company to company but again, broadly you are looking at around 2000-3000 hours with 500+ hours of turbine time (turboprop or jet.)

The reality that has evolved over the last 15 years and continues to increase in significance, is that there are very large numbers of pilots with CPL's (or fATPL's) these days. In the last decade the basic requirement for CPL issue in the UK (in most cases) dropped from 700 hours to around 250 hours. The reasons for this I have explained many times and a quick history search should save me having to repeat them again. However, the reality is that the floodgates were opened to thousands and thousands of prospective CPL aspirants. Coupled with a contraction in the availability of "stepping stone" jobs, this left whole swathes of fresh CPL/IR holders in a vary crowded arena holding very perishable licences. The results of that you can read in the many thousands of threads on the subject.

At around the same time that all these licence regulatory changes were happening, two other notable things happened. The first was the introduction of age legislation that quickly served to removed the early retirement profile for many established airline pilots. This gave many pilots (and their employers the airlines,) another 5-10 years of breathing space. The second event was the expansion of the airline cadet programmes. The result was, (coupled with a long global economic downturn,) that a huge swathe of airline entry level potential, that previously would have been satisfied by the 2000-3000 hour career advancers, was now being satisfied by the maturing cadet programmes. A cadet will only take 36 months to be at the 2000 hour+ level and of course almost all of that time is turbine time. Not only turbine time, but type experience and airline experience in exactly the measure the airline wants.

This has resulted in significantly reduced entry opportunities for career advancers and career changers (ex-military pilots moving to a civil environment, and experienced pilots abroad, looking to return to the UK, by way of just two examples.) For the fresh licence holder outside of these programmes that has resulted in pressure from below, and pressure from above, culminating in a great many people being squeezed out of the marketplace.

So you can see why a simple answer to your question is not as straightforward as you might hope. With a fresh CPL/IR most airlines with cadet programmes are simply not going to entertain you unless it is through their cadet route. Many others will simply say come back when you have enough of the right experience, and a very few may let you compete for their entry level recruitment in what is an extremely crowded and corpse laden field. The "stepping stones" are still out there, but the incumbents (they will be along shortly!) are hanging on to them for grim death, and almost everybody in that crowded field is looking for a way out.
Bealzebub is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2014, 05:09
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
777X with respect, you are wrong about airlines not being interested how you trained once you have experience. BA are very open nowadays about only being interested in people who trained the integrated way. That's a fact, modular guys there now are those who have joined before the game changed a few years back. Now we can argue over the rights and wrongs of this until the cows come home (and I personally think it's wrong) but that's how it is.

Last edited by Plastic787; 28th Apr 2014 at 05:27.
Plastic787 is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2014, 06:21
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: EU
Posts: 1,231
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't that simply because BA took a decision in 2011 to stop direct entry pilot recruitment and make a 'mutually beneficial' financial deal with an integrated training organisation?

777X? The notion that modular pilots have less ability because they took longer to get the licence is utterly nonsensical! Conversely, some might say that integrated pilots are the lesser because they emerge with less experience having crammed all the learning into fewer flights.

The reality is that there are fewer opportunities for modular students because airlines have reduced costs by simplifying recruitment avenues. This has the additional benefit that they get a financial inducement to stick to certain training organisations.

At a higher level, airlines such as NAS and TOM have realised that you can recruit fully trained pilots from the likes of FR just by offering normal remuneration.
Mikehotel152 is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2014, 06:30
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Mikehotel152 no it's been a policy of theirs since (in relative terms) long before the introduction of the FPP.

They haven't made a decision to stop Direct Entry at all, it is just on hiatus at the moment as they manage the crew levels after the BMI integration. They have already committed to FPP, they haven't committed to Direct Entry that's the difference.

In 2011 they were recruiting Direct Entry at the same time as opening the FPP in anticipation of a need for greater numbers of pilots. Then the BMI takeover happened and the plans went awry.
Plastic787 is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2014, 07:50
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Another airport hotel
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is integrated training necessary for airline employment?

If DEP started again at BA, are they really going to turn down an applicant from say Thomson or Monarch with a few thousand hours in house experience because they trained modular at Oxford 10 years ago?

Last edited by spider_man; 28th Apr 2014 at 08:39.
spider_man is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2014, 09:42
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: london
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I went modular, I have a little aerial photography job so at least i'm working. But before this I worked at a sim with a few OAA and CTC guys, they had been out of school a year or so, then they all got a call from their respective flight schools and they have all been placed with easyjet. I haven't even had a happy birthday email from the school i trained at.

My two cents.
elmore81 is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2014, 09:57
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 39
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was modular and was very lucky to get a major airline to pay my TR. But if I was starting out now and I could afford it then I'd go integrated with one if the big 3 FTOs. As much as I don't like it they very much have exclusive deals with the airlines. The self improver route is on it's way out unfortunately. There are a few TP operators out there but it's just a matter of time before they tie themselves up with one of the big 3.
fa2fi is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2014, 10:37
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The self improver route is on it's way out unfortunately
I don't think it is. And there is major pressure by some airlines to try and make it happen.

I have a feeling one of the big three is in trouble, just search around the forums and you will see that they are having problems.

They have been saying the modular method was going out ever since JAR came along. And to be honest they need it to go away for the current situation to continue with the size.

They have shot themselves in the foot to be honest with the cadet schemes because before there was a chance after training you got an interview but the majority of shiny jobs now are linked to the cadetship. So the majority of the self sponsored are in the same situation as the modular students post qualifying.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2014, 12:35
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: EU
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm employed towards the bottom end of the self improver route.

Have many modular and integrated friends either in the same position or worse, with some in a better position. There isn't a correlation that I can personally see among the people I know as to whether one is better than the other.

Tagged schemes obviously are doing the best for employment.

I can confirm from someone who was high up in one of the 'big 3' that this particular 'third' is in big trouble.
OhNoCB is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2014, 16:02
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 39
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry I meant to say I would do integrated but on a tagged scheme. Speculatively spending £100k without a job lined up afterwards these days is madness. You could call me a hypocrite as that's exactly what I did with my training but I did it in chunks, acing for each bit, and I never had more debt than I was happy to pay off should the whole thing work out. This attitude is not an option where you have a £1000 a month loan repayment.
fa2fi is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2014, 21:31
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The problem for the modular guys is that there is an ever dwindling list of possible employers. BMI is gone, Easy is tied in with wih CTC, Ryanair have taken on loads of integrated, Flybe are overcrewed, Aer Lingus and BA are running their own cadet schemes and any DE pilots must have time on a type. Those airlines probably account for about 90% of the annual jobs in the UK and Ireland alone. Also many of the charter outfits are either tied into CTC or can get any number of experienced pilots by offering market rates and industry standard T&CS so lure them across from a certain loco as pointed out by Mike.

That really leaves the small niche operators where competition will be tough for very few jobs. Quite possibly the machine you end up flying could pigeonhole you for the rest of your career and limit progression.
MCDU2 is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2014, 22:38
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: LONDON
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Essentially - two options as others have outlined too.

1) Integrated. If your going down this route, get on a tagged scheme. RHS Jet, large initial outlay, but large payoff and quicker access to LHS ultimately.

2) Modular. Cheap initially (by comparison). Takes years, not months. You may well get 'stuck' on TP's (assuming you get a job at all). A perhaps richer experience in terms of the wide range of flying and experiences you will have but boy do you pay for it in terms of long term financial health.

Using case 1 - In say 10 years you could be a Captain in a decent jet job assuming your initial Airline was a success, stable, etc.

Using case 2 - In say 10 years you might be lucky enough to be in a jet job after 3 years of instructing/GA, 2 years TP FO, 2 Years TP CP, now year 3 Jet FO at the end of a very long command upgrade list. Or you could be still stuck on a TP wondering what went wrong!

These are obviously just made up figures but I feel demonstrate that the initial type you get onto after training is vital in determining your long term career health these days.

For the record, I am in camp 2 and yes I am feeling stuck on TP's! I have been flying for 5 years professionally now and I haven't got a pot to pi$$ in... I know guys who did P2F and are now well into the command process at large low cost jet outfits, new cars, buying houses etc. Go figure!

It's a sad state of affairs. Non-flying friends can barely believe it when I tell them what I am earning! An ex-housemate recently started a TEMP job that she got by just asking a mate and her basic is higher than mine!
Wodka is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2014, 23:33
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Using case 1 - In say 10 years you could be a Captain in a decent jet job assuming your initial Airline was a success, stable, etc.
I am presently witnessing ex-cadet command promotions at the 6.5 year mark. This typically coincides with the conclusion of training loan attrition. A big jump in net income for those successful ex-cadets. You can never tell what is waiting around the corner, but I would expect to see this time interval fall to around 5 years over the next 24-36 months.
Bealzebub is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2014, 06:40
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there was 1263 CPL's issued in 2012-2013.

Ryanair took the majority of Modular and Integrated last year.

Realistically mod training schools only put through 15 a year each on average and there is something like 20 schools. So about 300 pilots.

Doesn't matter how you train the market is vastly over supplied.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2014, 08:59
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: earth
Age: 38
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 5 cents...

I just got my first airline gig this year with Air New Zealand.

i trained modular, took me 10 months to do my commercial with 151hrs total time on test day so despite what some people say, modular can be much quicker than integrated.

I worked as an instructor for 4 years (managed to get full time jobs!) and had 2300hrs TT before getting the airline break.

Best time of my life, but tough as well and many of my mates didnt make it through. Before getting my first job I was shovelling horse manure and fixing simulators just to pay the bills..

If you really love flying then nothing compares to doing it for a job and you will be able to put in the hard yards it takes! If you dont, the rewards just wont justify the hard work and you will just be miserable.


Best of luck buddy!
cptkris is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.