PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Freight Dogs (https://www.pprune.org/freight-dogs-41/)
-   -   Classic Crews ? (https://www.pprune.org/freight-dogs/501875-classic-crews.html)

kungfu panda 24th December 2012 05:51

As I say centerline747, I hope that I'm wrong but even the older 747-400's are being considered too costly in China, and a swift change to 777's is happening in order to remain competitive. This applies to both cargo and pax.

P.S I am not trying to be an Airline consultant, I'm stating what appears to be the obvious. I would love an intelligent response explaining why I'm wrong.:*

Whiskery 24th December 2012 06:31

I don't wish to sound cynical but this will probably turn out to be some fly by night, new start up freight company,based in a hole and little remuneration. That's IF it ever gets off the ground.

Merry Xmas and Happy New Year!

N707ZS 24th December 2012 08:42

PPRuNE would need a new thread "PAX Dogs".

747JJ 24th December 2012 13:38

Realism
 
Well centreline747. I actually fly the Classic, have flown and will probably fly a few more times. What Kungfu Panda says makes sense. A classic, even the newer ones, are maintenance intensive. Those with first class IFE are rare if nonexistent. Burning 12 tons an hour raises your seat per mile cost to an unacceptable level in a standard airline operation. My view is that the classic is t the end of it's road as a pax aircraft other than for a plain charter ops, Hajj from Africa on -300 or as a STBY aircraft.

To think that a first world pampered pax used to A330's B777's and the likes is going to put up with a clapped out rust bucket and sit in it for hours on end to save a few bob is delusional. It would have to be a El-Cheapo operation with lowest prices ever offered and then it would not pay for fuel and even less for the maintenance.

Just my two pence worth.

Earl 25th December 2012 07:25

Have to agree with 747JJ.
747 classic is finished along with the Tristar.
Southern just grounded all of them a few weeks ago.,
Some VIP companies still operate the SP.
Venetion. pratt and whitney etc.
Veteran avia out of SHJ also with the cargo ones.
747-400 I see have 2 ready in the mid wees to be cut up and on the list.
This one becoming obsolete quick also.
What i don't understand is with the world economy in such a bad state,why really good airplanes are being cut up for scrape.
Fuel is cheap now, but we have been down that road and cheated before by the arabs.
If fuel prices increase again, costs of the new airplanes quickly overide the fuel costs.
But then the young bean counter will have already made a name for himself and moved on to rape another industry.

JammedStab 25th December 2012 12:30


Originally Posted by kungfu panda (Post 7593800)
As I say centerline747, I hope that I'm wrong but even the older 747-400's are being considered too costly in China, and a swift change to 777's is happening in order to remain competitive. This applies to both cargo and pax.

But what are they going to replace all these cargo-400's with or even MD-11's. It will take a long time to build 777 freighters.

Looks like I won't have to worry about ETOPS for a while yet.

kungfu panda 25th December 2012 15:58

Jammedstab- Well the last I saw China cargo were getting rid of all their MD-11's, All of Jades 400's have been parked for most of this year, I don't know what's happening with them now. Air China Cargo have had a quiet year with the 400 and are planning a switch to the 777. You are correct though the switch takes time, particularly because of the ETOPS approvals.

I'm certain cargo and pax 400's will be around for a while, I was just saying that they are beginning to get costly and some are being replaced and parked. It is for this reason that I can't understand how a 200 PAX operation could be successful, however my youth and inexperience has been pointed out to me, so lets hope that I'm wrong.

hetfield 25th December 2012 18:57

Lufthansa Cargo (MD11) has already ordered 5 T7s.

JanetFlight 25th December 2012 22:03

Baltia Airlines Take 23...???

fr8box 25th December 2012 23:17

Ahhh yes, Baltia, a start up since 1989.....

Metro man 25th December 2012 23:45

Even the lowest, dodgy, fly by night pax operation can usually manage a B767. At least that will have the alphabet soup of letters required such as RNAV, TCAS, RVSM etc. Only two engines/flight crew, much easier to maintain and cheaper to run.

Earl 26th December 2012 04:03

Even one of the 767 200ER is on the schedule to be chopped soon, major airline parked this.
Airplane is immaculate.
Not sure what is going on now.

headcorn 2nd January 2013 13:00

Any news on the so called start up?

Idle Reverse 4th January 2013 17:40

No more news yet
 
Disappointingly there is no more "positive" update yet. They say it is still "on" but I was hoping for a little more than this; like an initial contact with with some of the potential crew members that have made enquires and a time scale for the start date. As soon as they do come up with positive news then I'll post it on here. Good luck :ok:

JanetFlight 4th January 2013 20:35

Welll...at least Georgian Star International Airlines just acquired a 747-300 as below:

Photos: Boeing 747-329M(SF) Aircraft Pictures | !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

EW73 4th January 2013 22:43

Ahhhh...the 747-300 . . . .easily the best 747 model, from the point of view of the crew.

Though, from an operators viewpoint, maybe a little expensive to operate. But when the hire costs are so low, there is room for those additional costs.

CargoOne 4th January 2013 22:44

Georgian Star International - can it more dodgy than that?
As much as I love 747, it is over. Even 747-400 are no longer the airplane of choice.


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:44.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.