PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Freight Dogs (https://www.pprune.org/freight-dogs-41/)
-   -   Tradewinds 747 Program Done (https://www.pprune.org/freight-dogs/330256-tradewinds-747-program-done.html)

TowerDog 28th December 2008 22:15


Not according to runway analysis data specific for runway and airport; and not according to demonstrated 3-engine airplane climb performance. Or are you from the new school of "experienced captains" who individualize procedures and make their own rules for aborting the takeoff after V1?
Neither Mr. Glueball...They had the wrong level-off altitude on the card..:sad:


If they talked to u then I assume u didn't have to "hear"?

Yeah, bad grammar on my part.
It should say: I was asked to not write stuff in the book. As in heard with with my own ears....Not just rumors.


Hey, all I know is crews have refused to take the aircraft because they didn't have any catering!
TDX did dispatch a 3 leg all nighter, 14 hour duty day trip without catering.
Instead we were promised we would be catered down line. That did not happen so we were a bunch of hungry and cranky guys back in the MIA the next day.


Per either Pratt or FAA supervised company mx policy, + three compressor stall write ups = mandatory engine change / overhaul.
Yeah, we went through a few engines back then as compressor stalls was almost a daily occurence. Both during high altitude take offs such as Bogota and Quito, and stalls during reverse on landing @ sea-level, etc.

TowerDog 28th December 2008 23:13

Link to video of the crash in Colombia:


ASP -

WhalePFE 28th December 2008 23:33

I personally told Connie to his face (some years ago) that the days of maintaining engines the JT3D way were right and truly over.

Yeah, I am sure you did!:8

Cessna120 29th December 2008 07:04

To my knowledge the Medillin Accident was a landing NOT a takeoff.

Lowrider2 29th December 2008 09:56

From the news report:

The accident happened not long after the aircraft's departure from Bogota's El Dorado Airport. AFP quoted Colombian Civil Aviation official Donald Tascon, who said, "The plane crashed when it was trying to return to Bogota after reporting a fire in one engine."

TowerDog 29th December 2008 12:31


To my knowledge the Medillin Accident was a landing NOT a takeoff.
Your knowledge is flawed in that case.:confused:


The plane crashed when it was trying to return to Bogota after reporting a fire in one engine."
You must be thinking of the Kalitta crash in Bogota...?

This here thread is about Tradewinds Airlines and a crash in Medellin, Rio Negro airport in 2006.

There is even a link to a security camera video of the crash above.

Slidder184 30th December 2008 03:14

agree with towerdog, it was during take off. I have seen the video and also have two cd's of two different views, also much paperwork, reports, etc. First hand knowledge of the accident.

v1vRFLY 13th January 2009 05:16

DO NOT MISUNDERSTAND ME....I am not saying the crew was NOT AT FAULT.

The low time Captain was allowing the newly trained FO (125 hours of OE) to do the takeoff, at night, at a Special Airport, on a WET, UNGROOVED runway with pooling water, without using a WET V1, at an operation with shoddy engine maintenance. Even after attempting to reject after V1, they did not use FULL REV until the last 500 feet. They might have made it if they did. So YES they screwed up.

But I AM SAYING that more heads should have rolled for those responsible for this accident... from the DO, schedulers, maintenance, etc, on down the line, but only the crew 'was hung out to dry.'

With this being said, all the training in the world cannot prepare you for what happened to them. Sure, you will say I NEVER attempt a reject after V1...AHEM AHEM...I have seen this done countless times in the SIM by seasoned pilots who think they CANNOT make it by taking it airborne. When asked afterwards, their common answer: "it was a gut reaction I had to make in a split second." ...even though it goes against all the principles of aviation and countless years of training.

When this engine went, a fire ball shot forward of the cockpit and shuddered the entire aircraft (according to reports). The Captain took control and attempted to reject. His gut feeling told him that something terrible had happened and in that split second, he did not think the plane to be airworthy. Blame him if you want...but he is still walking in his shoes...something you cannot do.

GlueBall 13th January 2009 07:21


" . . .to do the takeoff, at night, at a Special Airport, on a WET, UNGROOVED runway with pooling water . . . "
The video shows it to be daylight in light rain. MDE/SKRG 3500m [11,483'] Rwy-36 is significantly sloped up hill, [58' higher at Rwy18 threshold] with hardly any propensity for water to be "pooling."


" . . . all the training in the world cannot prepare you for what happened to them. Sure, you will say I NEVER attempt a reject after V1...AHEM AHEM...I have seen this done countless times in the SIM by seasoned pilots who think they CANNOT make it by taking it airborne."

"All the training in the world" at most carriers teaches captains to get their hands off the throttle levers by V1 and to keep them off! In the past 20 years I haven't seen any pilots in the sim aborting after V1 because they had "thought" that they couldn't get airborne, . . . perhaps because they would bust their sim check! :{

Slidder184 13th January 2009 23:30

"When this engine went, a fire ball shot forward of the cockpit and shuddered the entire aircraft (according to reports)."http://static.pprune.org/images/smilies/eek.gif
What reports r u reading?? http://static.pprune.org/images/smilies/confused.gif LOL Never saw that on the vid's, either of them!

Dutch74 13th January 2009 23:40

OMG
 
This thread is full of idiots. Watch the video.

thedude1 21st February 2009 20:17

The problem is, there are 2 videos. The one you see on youtube is the security cam and only show the later portion of the abort. There is supposedly another one floating around that show the entire incident. I am still trying to get my hands on that one.

v1vRFLY 30th March 2009 07:22

Not reading any reports....this comes from talking directly to the flight crew while they were awaiting incarceration. I merely stated what the crewmembers told me of the incident, but all you monday morning quarterbacks and video analyzers know better than what the crew told me, Im sure.

As previous check airman and GS instructor for the B747 fleet at TDX, i had an interest in what happened and incorporated all info into a CRM class about the matter, which did not settle well with many in the company....found that every department, as i previously mentioned, was at fault in some manner or fashion. In the end, the crew were the only ones to be fired.

But of course, this thread is full of idiots like some have mused. :=


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:38.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.