PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Freight Dogs (https://www.pprune.org/freight-dogs-41/)
-   -   Cargolux 747-8 Trashed at Prestwick (https://www.pprune.org/freight-dogs/593368-cargolux-747-8-trashed-prestwick.html)

Stratofreighter 6th Apr 2017 19:21

Prestwick pics: Cargolux 747 LX-VCF grounded now due fuel leak loaded Bell 412.......
 
...oh dear... :ugh:
Cargolux LX-VCF grounded by helicopter load fuel leak. - Airliners.net
scroll for pictures.


Also see
https://planetradio.co.uk/west/local...e-cargo-plane/

smith 11th Apr 2017 11:51

Cargolux 747-8 Trashed at Prestwick
 
Was carrying a helicopter on board which sprung a fuel leak and soaked all the avionics bay with gas. Plane has been on ground about a week with nose open trying to dry it out. Only hearsay but a lot of damage done and talk of it being scrapped.

Evanelpus 11th Apr 2017 13:56

Was always under the impression that fluids (fuel in this case) should be removed before flight.

The Member 11th Apr 2017 20:00

Looks like LX-VCF arrived back in LUX today. :ok:

tdracer 11th Apr 2017 23:15


With the early 8's being under 10 years old could it really be an economical write off for that?
Actually, the first 747-8F deliveries weren't until late 2011, so it can't be much more than 5 years old (before I retired I could go into the Boeing data base and check when exactly it was delivered but I no longer have that option :rolleyes:).
I never did give much credence to the rumors that it was a write-off, although if the fuel got in the ebay there could be some expensive damage.
Good to hear it's back to being airworthy at least.
I'm thinking the shipper is going to be on the hook for a sizeable penalty for failing to properly prepare the helicopter for shipment...:eek:

bluesideoops 12th Apr 2017 06:04

Perhaps the more learned ones here can confirm but it was always my understanding that any vehicles being transported were to have all fuel and oils removed prior to flight other than 'unusable' that may be hard to remove? Contravention of this would constitute a non-compliance of carriage of dangerous goods legislation i.e. that fuel/oil was not transported in the correct containers as specified in the IATA DG manual. Thoughts?

STN Ramp Rat 12th Apr 2017 08:11

the aircraft flew from PIK to LUX yesterday after almost two weeks on the ground in PIK

dusk2dawn 13th Apr 2017 15:46

http://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/593...ml#post9737504


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:51.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.