Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

GSS contract with BA terminated

Wikiposts
Search
Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

GSS contract with BA terminated

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Jan 2014, 12:59
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: EGSS
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GSS contract with BA terminated

The FedEx and UPS situation won't change. It's perfectly legal. Atlas will also struggle to find regular income from 3 -8F's too. I'm also curious how Qatar will be able to carry BAWC freight bearing in mind that's why GSS had to be formed in the first place?
Flightmech is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 13:16
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great point Icelanta. I forgot about Norwegian Long Haul 787 opening for the GSS crews. Perhaps closer to home if a 787 LGW pilot base is established at some point. The current NLH basing policy is still confusing.

Good luck to all GSS crews. Despite the low pay, I imagine the flying itself was interesting.
Iver is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 14:04
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let us hope that the EU will finally ban the Cabotage done by Fedex and UPS very soon, as there are several courtcases and investigations running against it. ( and yes, it IS cabotage as they operate within one economic union, which is the basis of cabotage, and not political union)
I cannot find ANY definition of cabotage that supports your contention. In fact, I found more than one discussion/definition which addresses the EU, and they all address operations within a single member state:

http://www.aerolegalservices.com/Art...ircraft.shtml:
European Union. Cabotage regulations in the European Union are more complex than in Canada. The difficulty results from the European Union’s definition of commercial transportation. In the U.S., the U.S. Customs service defines commercial transportation as transportation “for compensation or hire”. However, the European Union defines “commercial use” as “the use of means of transportation for the transport of persons or of goods for remuneration or in the framework of the economic activity of an enterprise”.

Unfortunately, the European Union definition means that a U.S. registered corporate aircraft operating within the European Union for corporate or other business purposes can be considered to be engaging in commercial use or transportation. As a result, if a corporate aircraft flies into a European Union country, picks up a citizen of that country and then travels on to another destination within that country, it is likely that the second flight would be in violation of the European Union cabotage regulations.
http://www.law-pedia.com/cabotage.htm:
Definition of cabotage
n. Transport services provided in one member state of the EU by a carrier of another state. Article 71 (formerly 75) of the Treaty of Rome provides that the Council of the European Union may lay down proposals in relation to the conditions under which nonresident carriers may operate transport services within a member state.
C 21/2 Official Journal of the European Union (road haulage, but identical concept):
Based on Article 71(1)(b) of the EC Treaty, the Community Regulations (2) give the following definition:
Any non-resident carrier who is a holder of the Community authorisation is entitled to operate, on a temporary basis and without quantitative restrictions, national road haulage services in another Member State, without having a registered office or other establishment in that State.
Also, if it is of such concern to the EU, why hasn't a EU company simply opened up shop and offered the services? Surely all those EU airlines and companies would jump over to another EU company...
Intruder is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 14:13
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: EGSS
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GSS contract with BA terminated

What intruder said.....
Flightmech is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 19:19
  #25 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Secret Agent!



Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also the "airline that can't be named" in AUH is doing massive expansion in 2014! Approx 500 pilots required I heard! It's all on their website!
JB007 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 20:02
  #26 (permalink)  
PFR
Gamekeeper
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: South East
Age: 61
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Such sad news - all the best for the future for such a great team of people.
PFR.
PFR is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 20:44
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Timbuktoo
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Deal with Qatar will work very easily around the EU/UK rules.

Qatar will commence a B777F schedule to the UK and BAWC/IAGC will buy block space on these flights. In a way, DOH will be BAWC/IAGC's cargo hub...!

Wouldn't be surprised if QR order -8s now...!

On a side note are these QR freighters going to fly into STN?
Dihaz is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2014, 10:39
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: wales
Posts: 462
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With Qatar joining 'one world alliance' it was a bit of a no brainer really with them investing in a cargo division with 777F and A330F . Think with just a change to 777F for HKG the fuel savings alone is a no-brainer.Probably as hig a proportion of UK jobs flying for them ! Havent seen any mention of the rest of the jobs going yet , didnt they have a maintrol etc at STN ?
bvcu is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2014, 11:28
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: EGSS
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GSS contract with BA terminated

While it's important to keep a customer happy part of the blame has to be with GSS Management for bowing down to BAWC over the years. Enquiries from other carriers had been made to fly their freight during unused maintenance slots in HKG but as soon as "permission" was sought from BAWC they would suddenly come up with a HKG-MAA-HKG carrying a packet of tissues one way and an empty ferry the other! Relationships could have been built with other potential customers over the years but sticking with one has finally bit them in the a**e.
Flightmech is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2014, 13:02
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely BA would be able to absorb the crew from GSS. There must be a recruitment need in the next 6 months, rumour a while back had a lot of retirements pending this year at BA. They have a trained and known commodity available. Why waste it.

Good luck to all involved it is horrible position to be in, to work hard for an employer just to be ditched at the stroke of bean counters pen.
Best foot forward is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2014, 13:24
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NZ
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For those that are familiar with GSS the gravity of this announcement is clear. However, I will make it clear for the others. GSS was established to fly this contract. It is their only contract. This story is being sold as a contract cancellation and GSS are looking for more work. I find it very hard to believe they will succeed in that endeavour before the end of April. This news is potentially the end of GSS and the end of employment for the entire workforce.

There is the hope of the mid-contract cancellation payment sustaining a GSS skeleton crew after the contract ends with the hope of finding more work. However, in a rented office with rented computers and desks, I can only be a realist.

In regards to Qatar; as far as I understand IAG cargo is merely buying space on the existing Qatar route network, albeit with Qatar taking the hit on adding extra rotations to suit IAG, therefore the entire contact has been cancelled and is not continuing. This means no hope of TUPE for the staff (small hope or consolation that it was anyway).

Good luck everyone.
cockygashandlazy is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2014, 13:37
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1601
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GSS contract with BA terminated

If Qatar were to order -8......why not just take the GSS ones from Atlas ?
TOWTEAMBASE is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2014, 13:45
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: EGSS
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GSS contract with BA terminated

Why order the -8 when you have the 777? Although I guess BAWC will have to lose some of the oil drilling freight that used to move between IAH and DMM without a nose loading option.
Flightmech is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2014, 17:57
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1601
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GSS contract with BA terminated

And maybe some of the cars and military hardware too
TOWTEAMBASE is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2014, 18:15
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: The Home of the Gnomes
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Will BALPA insist on BA F/O's being able to bid for Qatar 777F commands as they did with GSS (under the BA SCOPE agreement)?
One would hope that BALPA had more pressing priorities with the impending job losses amongst GSS employees than the continued rights of BA pilots to help themselves to other people's commands.
No. Qatar Airways is a stand alone company and IAG are buying capacity on their freighters.

GSS only ever existed to operate BAWC services and was only formed as a UK subsidiary of Atlas when it was pointed out by the CAA that it was illegal for an N-reg company to carry out UK based work. I think BALPA were quite concerned about US pilots helping themselves to other people's commands.

My thoughts are with the GSS employees at what must be a very difficult time.
Tay Cough is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2014, 19:55
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My thoughts are also with the GSS Pilots, I wish you all the best in securing future employment.
Holer Moler is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2014, 22:19
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Piggy in the middle company always going nowhere
mark one eyeball is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2014, 06:00
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Tuvalu
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SIMPLE MINDED SYMPATHY!

You should look very closely to what I have posted.


I HAVE been there and done that.


My comment is truth.


PERHAPS I should also give sympathy to the AACS operation?


I do not believe you have any skin in the game nor ever will.


Step back from your ludicrous commentary and save others from a sensible career development in aviation or otherwise.


Good luck commentator. (Experienced Professional Pilot?)


I am a retired and have spent 37 years in the system that I post so why do you not listen closely for yourself and the benefit of others? Very very narrow minded.


My 747 (SP,100,200,300, 400, -8) exp alone is greater than 20,000 hrs.


Sympathy? Think about it?


Maybe I should have sympathy for the AACS pilots. Do you know anything about that?


Do you anything about Atlas founder Chowdery words: "This is the job you have chosen."? If no,t please STEP BACK and save the truly career minded from your BS!


My sympathies to you!


You want to help your peers than you should look very very closely to my posts!


CHEERS! Bloke!


Oh, and in any case, ANY aviation job is membership in a FLYING CLUB!


MINE WAS!
MoJo WoJo is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2014, 07:11
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: essex mole hole
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good luck to all the Loadmasters if they are also looking for work

Mole Man
mole man is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2014, 12:08
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GSS

Mojo.

You are a tw@t.
A340Yumyum is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.