Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

Manangement's Dream Scenario

Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

Manangement's Dream Scenario

Old 17th Mar 2012, 04:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Flyin' low and feeling mean
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Manangement's Dream Scenario

Widebody freighters could be
piloted remotely within 15 years


By: David Learmount Amsterdam
12 hours ago
Source:

Civil freight aircraft will be flown by either a single pilot on board with a remote co-pilot on the ground, or no on-board crew at all within 10 to 15 years, delegates of the ATC Global conference in Amsterdam were told.

The extraordinary prediction came from Steve Pennington, executive director of the US policy board on federal aviation, who spoke at the event earlier this month.
As a senior military official, Pennington has considerable experience of managing the deployment and operation of unmanned air vehicles across various sizes and mission types.

Pennington says one of air traffic management's major challenges for the near future will be managing UAVs, because they will be used in a significant proportion of civil and military operations.

He predicts this will start in commercial civil aviation via the freight operations of companies such as FedEx and UPS, which will use a single-pilot crew or pilot devices entirely from the ground.
Hogger60 is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2012, 04:26
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: any town as retired.
Posts: 2,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Totally agree

Single Pilot, monitoring the dog....This will increase the standard of Pilot Skill set...as required by the FAA.

Like the (almost) unmanned trains, only there to give the public a feeling of security.

I predict within 10 years for cargo, and 15 for pax.

The UAV progress is the guide, but I dont see MOL attempting this, but I am sure he will get his publicity machine powered up.

glf

Last edited by Gulfstreamaviator; 17th Mar 2012 at 06:30.
Gulfstreamaviator is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2012, 05:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: global gypsie
Age: 52
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At the current development rate of artificial inteligence, it will probably be sooner.
thrustpig is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2012, 08:05
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Northants
Age: 44
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I might be being thick but why's it desirable for companies to take pilots out of the cockpit? (from a military perspective it obviously makes total sense, given the nature of operations) If as, is being suggested here, there'll still be a need for monitoring, you're still going to have to be paying wages, and, presumably, they'll still need to be trained to the same/similar standards as now in the event that they're required to 'step in'? And surely the less interaction a remote pilot has with the machine, the more difficult it will be to retain necessary skills and even attentiveness while at the (remote) controls? (safer when all is well, less safe than now when the **** is hitting the fan?)

Should this just be viewed as a step towards removing the man from the process entirely (which, I completely understand, would be desirable for commercial operators)? Are cargo operators really going to be that bothered by such a halfway house?
KarlADrage is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2012, 08:35
  #5 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,091
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All this has been thrashed to death before, the security risks and considerations far outweigh any advantage to going pilot less. A dedicated suicide bomber and his mates could take over a ground control station, causing chaos, or they could simply transmit rogue signals that block the genuine ground to air signals, also causing chaos. The concept is a non starter due to security, regardless of technical advances.

The USA should know better than anyone, if they check their inventory of UAVs they will be well aware that they have lost a lot of UAVs and most are not through enemy action, they are light years away from an acceptable level of reliability.

Last edited by parabellum; 17th Mar 2012 at 09:01.
parabellum is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2012, 09:55
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: E.U.
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Parabellum,
I fully agree with you. The number of independent variables affecting any commercial flight is staggering and increasing yearly. I have heard this for many years and IMHO it's getting further away than ever.
(Please dont mention solving this with yet more layers of software!)
However a nice Federal research budget for big US contractors might be more realistic....
Emoclew is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2012, 10:13
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Manangement, always wanting
Not going to happen for a looooooong time.
Basil is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2012, 10:45
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Long ago and far away ......
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
I don't see this happening in my lifetime, and I expect to live another 30 years, al least!
MrBernoulli is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2012, 12:14
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: in a hotspot on that planet
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why don't we ask Mr Military, how many of thy UAV they have lost...

I am sure the number is sky rocketing compared to the accident record in civil aviation...

Any numbers out there? I guess u woun't get any...
flaphandlemover is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2012, 12:26
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Unsettled
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In all fairness, I think the lawyers are going to be on the pilot's side so to speak for once.

I can't imagine a manufacturer daft enough to take the huge liability of unmanned aircraft on them. It's simply too risky.
root is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2012, 12:29
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: EGPH
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How trains are driverless?

I can think of the DLR in London and not many more.

They must be a whole lot more to automate and yet they haven't managed to do it yet.
renard is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2012, 13:10
  #12 (permalink)  
Trash du Blanc
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: KBHM
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd say the trend is the opposite. We're putting more pilots on board, not less.

I fly for Fedex. We are buying new 777 and 767 freighters, paying hundreds of millions of dollars for them. The 777's typically fly with four pilots onboard. The 767's will have provisions for three.

I've said this a thousand times on this board - I'll start worrying about my job when I start seeing unmanned freight trains.

The military guy has never had to worry about a bottom line, either. Who is going to pay for all the certification? For the infrastructure?

I just flew CDG-Dubai-Delhi, passing through the airspaces of the european countries, Turkey, Iraq, UAE, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India. ALL these countries would have to be on board and provide the infrastructure and support required. All to save the cost of a copilot?
Huck is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2012, 13:49
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sion
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about the flight attendants? will they be inflatable ones also controlled from the ground?
3MTA3 is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2012, 14:08
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: A parallel universe.
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Danger It's all about liability!

Why bother with remote control (technical issues, costs, liability when there's an incident, accident or terrorist take over) when the airline managers can hire cheap pilots who will fly for food, throw any sensible FTL's out of the window and blame those arrogant and overpaid pilots if something goes wrong?

The money saved by lowering pilot salaries and by not acquiring expensive remote control technology can then subsequently be distributed among managers and shareholders!

Now that's a win win situation for management and it's been going on for years!
Tank2Engine is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2012, 16:15
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How trains are driverless?
I can think of the DLR in London and not many more.
They must be a whole lot more to automate and yet they haven't managed to do it yet.
Quite a lot of 'little' people-movers the size of DLR are centrally controlled - usually to be expected for new construction, and some retrofit going on.

But the comparison isn't valid because trains effectively operate in just one dimension (being constrained to the track), and entail a zillion fewer things that should they go wrong unexpectedly might lead to disaster.

The realization that sophisticated "unmanned" aircraft e.g. GlobalHawk operate very successfully makes one forget that they're remotely piloted, not pilot-less.
poorjohn is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2012, 16:55
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Exit stage right.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Programmable flight into aircraft so in the event of loss of ground communications it flights itself to destination or alternate with options in case of weather etc.

Unpalatable as it seems, I see it as a reality with time frame described.

I can almost envisage a scenario in the future when aircraft have no cockpit, no windows and Airline crew on board amount to one or two people who check that everybody is buckled in.

Fact is that they can end a cargo vehicle to Space Station without a pilot.
racedo is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2012, 17:33
  #17 (permalink)  
Trash du Blanc
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: KBHM
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fact is that they can end a cargo vehicle to Space Station without a pilot.
Yes, but at what cost? Keep in mind that you've got to get the cost per mile down below the cost of a flight crew.

And forget about "cockpitless" cargo airframes. No way a clean sheet aircraft can compare in cost to a used airliner. I would submit that the cost of development would rival that of the 787. All to save the cost of a flight crew?

We can do many things. But in practice we do the cost-effective things.
Huck is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2012, 17:34
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why are the posts in this thread so riddled with spelling errors and missing words? Just READ through it!
A living example of pilot error.

Before you dismiss the idea of autonomous aircraft out of hand, read this:

Technological singularity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Technological singularity refers to the hypothetical future emergence of greater-than-human intelligence through technological means, very probably resulting in explosive superintelligence.

Since the capabilities of such intelligence would be difficult for an unaided human mind to comprehend, the occurrence of a technological singularity is seen as an intellectual event horizon, beyond which events can not be predicted or understood.

Proponents of the singularity typically state that an "intelligence explosion" is a key factor of the Singularity where superintelligences design successive generations of increasingly powerful minds.

This hypothesized process of intelligent self-modification might occur very quickly, and might not stop until the agent's cognitive abilities greatly surpass that of any human. The term "intelligence explosion" is therefore sometimes used to refer to this scenario.

The term was coined by science fiction writer Vernor Vinge, who argues that artificial intelligence, human biological enhancement or brain-computer interfaces could be possible causes of the singularity. The concept is popularized by futurists like Ray Kurzweil and it is expected by proponents to occur sometime in the 21st century, although estimates do vary.

Technological singularity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
With the level of automation already available on current aircraft (reliable Autopilots, Auto Thrust, AutoLand etc) we're already more than half way there.

Self healing electronics are now in development.

Sometimes I wonder - why an ECAM action message at all? Why not an automatic system action and follow-up ECAM completed advisory?

Personally, given the inevitable progress of computing power, I have no doubt whatsoever that this is the future. The only question is WHEN, not IF.

Last edited by Algol; 17th Mar 2012 at 17:48.
Algol is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2012, 18:36
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,545
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
With the level of automation already available on current aircraft (reliable Autopilots, Auto Thrust, AutoLand etc) we're already more than half way there.

Self healing electronics are now in development.

Sometimes I wonder - why an ECAM action message at all? Why not an automatic system action and follow-up ECAM completed advisory?
I'd agree it's not "if" but "when", but I'd ask how far off are we having all runways and all airports supporting autoland on a 24/7/365 basis to allow fully automated operation?

It would also be interesting to see a fully automated system action for the likes of a "Fuel Imbalance Message".........
wiggy is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2012, 19:23
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: lapbandland
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello Hal, do you read
Your destination has an unforecast crosswind, you will have to program
yourself to do a circling approach onto the shorter runway without
an approach aid or guidance.
Whats that,you hav'nt been programmed for this, never mind, just
throw yourself into the ground near the airport.
That way its easier for us to collect your pieces and re-cycle you.
PEOPLE are landing UAV's remotely.It's one thing to do autolands
in ideal conditions by onboard computers, there are too many
variables for much else.

Hopefully mankind will have burnt all the kerosene up before
this develops to onboard human free piloting.
boofta is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.