Southern B777F
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Klamath Falls, OR
Age: 65
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Didn't feel they could make money with B747-400's; so, they sold the two -400 options to Kalitta and exercised the B777 ones they got with Cargo360. Will have a total of ten coming by 2012 (I seem to remember?). Anyway, they are going to fly cargo with them! I'm not a salesman; but, my "guess" is that the purchase price is less than the -400, so hourly ACMI and fuel costs will be substantially lower. With lighter loads going it out, it will be a more cost effective option (abeit, shorter legs). It won't go non-stop ICN to LAX; but, will still cost a lot less, with increased reliability.
http://www.airlinepilotcentral.com/a...thern_air.html
http://www.airlinepilotcentral.com/a...thern_air.html
Last edited by cpnkirk59; 4th Sep 2009 at 15:02.
US Southern's T7s will soon be in the sandpit, if they're not already. They undercut Kalitta's bid to supply food to the troops, UAE-Pakistan-Afghanistan.
I wonder when the last time was that Connie got underbid?
I wonder when the last time was that Connie got underbid?
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Klamath Falls, OR
Age: 65
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You may know more about the deal than I do; but, Kalitta gave up that contract to SAI. The initial operations out of Sharja were operationally restrictive and Kalitta pulled out. SAI is also flying Midex contracts (re: see Midex under Middle East forum - from what I've read on that thread, their pilots have done a lot of sitting recently). SAI is a low cost operator; but, as far as "I" know, they haven't been cornering the market by "under-bidding" their competitors. The B777 may go straight to desert, as you say; but, so far, they seem to be keeping their airplanes and crews, they didn't furlough, flying. Historically, I see no one financing a high operating costs new airplanes for SAI; unless there is a relative "certainty", they are going to be used. I could be wrong.
RP
RP
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Germany
Age: 54
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At the moment 77F only available fresh from factory. Even if they pick some frames deferred by others, 10 of them should still come at about $ 2bn. Wonder how SOO plan to recover that money with their kind of operation
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: coming to a bar near you
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The B777 may go straight to desert, as you say; but, so far, they seem to be keeping their airplanes and crews, they didn't furlough, flying.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Klamath Falls, OR
Age: 65
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, I know - I'm one of the fifty-two pilots furloughed. I guess the recalls that started last week don't mean anything. I'd better not plan on being recalled; since, you appear to know more about SAI than I do.
RP
RP
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: West Coast, south of disorder
Age: 55
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"The initial operations out of Sharja were operationally restrictive and Kalitta pulled out" Not true, the number of dollars per hour under bid was about $1000 per. As some else said "when was the last time Connie was under bid?" From what I have seen and heard Connie will not and has not bid anything at a loss. It my be break even, but not at a loss. As far a operational restrictive I can't answer that. They are still operating in and out of Sharja with 747-200's. I believe that is the same airframe SAI uses? abet PW vs GE's.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cedar Rapids
Age: 49
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As to the original poster, Southern has, through their aquisition of Cargo 360, a good (supposedly) relationship with Korean. Its entirely possilble that a number of the 777s will do that run (say Southern shiney) while the 742s get shot at out of Sharjah (Southern shot?). They are rumored to have sent crewmembers to 777 school. Whether they can keep eight or so maintained and busy enough to make payments as a charter company will be informative to watch.
cpnkirk
The B777F has very long legs and will do ICN-LAX without any problems. It can carry it's max payload (around 106 tons) for up to 10.5 hours. You won't get that kind of performance out of anything else, including a -400ERF.
The B777F has very long legs and will do ICN-LAX without any problems. It can carry it's max payload (around 106 tons) for up to 10.5 hours. You won't get that kind of performance out of anything else, including a -400ERF.
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: West Coast, south of disorder
Age: 55
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Polar did ICN-LAX with the 400. A 400BCF should be able to fly 11.9 hrs with 125 ton which is well within the ICN-LAX route. The 777 should be able to do 106 ton and save many tons of fuel on the same route.
I could very well be wrong though......
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: West Coast, south of disorder
Age: 55
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oakhill purchased 360 then 360 purchased SAI, then rolled the whole thing into SAH In Jan of 08. Oakhill then handed in 360's certificate on the 24th of Jan 08 to the Feds.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Age: 53
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
777F's will be owned by a separate aircraft leasing company owned by OHCP (OH Aircraft Acquisition LLC). They will then be leased to Southern Air. Good shell game and if another company is willing to pony up $$ for the aircraft I'd bet they'd lease them out in a heartbeat.
Personally (I'm a SAI vet) I don't see SAI ever maintaining an aircraft to ETOPS standards...
Sponge
Personally (I'm a SAI vet) I don't see SAI ever maintaining an aircraft to ETOPS standards...
Sponge