Can a pilot object to transpot live animals?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: above
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can a pilot object to transpot live animals?
Hi
I was wondering if there is any law in any western Europe country that gives a pilot the right to refuse to transport live animals because of his/her religious or moral belief. (ie. orango or dogs destined to laboratories for experiments)
Did something like this ever happen and what was the outcome?
regards
I was wondering if there is any law in any western Europe country that gives a pilot the right to refuse to transport live animals because of his/her religious or moral belief. (ie. orango or dogs destined to laboratories for experiments)
Did something like this ever happen and what was the outcome?
regards
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: A parallel universe.
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If it's legal to carry, properly boxed, loaded etc, why not?
Don't get me wrong, I'm totally against animal testing, but what's next?
A pilot of a passenger airline interviewing all his passengers and checking their luggage to find out if anyone has either moral and religious believes, or possessions (eg. a book from Scientology, a Bible, or heaven forbid: a pornographic movie on their laptop!) that conflicts with his own views? An environmentally conscious cargo pilot refusing to accept exotic high performance cars?
Sorry, but welcome to the real world!
Don't get me wrong, I'm totally against animal testing, but what's next?
A pilot of a passenger airline interviewing all his passengers and checking their luggage to find out if anyone has either moral and religious believes, or possessions (eg. a book from Scientology, a Bible, or heaven forbid: a pornographic movie on their laptop!) that conflicts with his own views? An environmentally conscious cargo pilot refusing to accept exotic high performance cars?
Sorry, but welcome to the real world!
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: East Anglia.
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Though I am not a pilot this intrigues me. Surely the decision on cargo is made well before the pilot's involvement.
In my humble opinion, the pilot is contracted to carry out the orders of his employers.
If he/she is going to be selective, I fear for the integrity of the company he works for.
My thoughts are the pilot should carry out orders.
In my humble opinion, the pilot is contracted to carry out the orders of his employers.
If he/she is going to be selective, I fear for the integrity of the company he works for.
My thoughts are the pilot should carry out orders.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: above
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for your points.
This has nothing to do with my question. I never talked about interfering with people individual rights or belief, I was talking about objecting to transport live animals destined to a cruel death as this may be against the pilot moral or religious belief.
Whether "the pilot is contracted to carry out the orders of his employers" is completely subjective. What would you do if your airline assigns you a flight to transport human beings destined to be sold as slaves?
While this example may sound exaggerated it shows that what is acceptable and what it is not is completely subjective, indeed a few decades ago it was perfectly acceptable for ships captains to transport slaves, nowadays thanks god nobody would accept to do that.
While it can be perfectly acceptable to you to transport animals which are destined to a whole life of painful tortures, some people can find it very difficult to accept that they are involved in some ways in the process of condemning an animal to endless brutal tortures and death.
In many countries people can object to military service due to their moral belief, I suppose there might be a legal way to object to do some duties your employer may request you to do. I obviously understand that if most of the duties involved in my job are against my belief I cannot expect to be relieved from all of them, and I should just not accept the job or quit. But if there are just a limited number of duties involving going against my beliefs why shouldn't I be legally allowed to request not to be assigned to those duties?
A pilot of a passenger airline interviewing all his passengers and checking their luggage to find out if anyone has either moral and religious believes
Whether "the pilot is contracted to carry out the orders of his employers" is completely subjective. What would you do if your airline assigns you a flight to transport human beings destined to be sold as slaves?
While this example may sound exaggerated it shows that what is acceptable and what it is not is completely subjective, indeed a few decades ago it was perfectly acceptable for ships captains to transport slaves, nowadays thanks god nobody would accept to do that.
While it can be perfectly acceptable to you to transport animals which are destined to a whole life of painful tortures, some people can find it very difficult to accept that they are involved in some ways in the process of condemning an animal to endless brutal tortures and death.
In many countries people can object to military service due to their moral belief, I suppose there might be a legal way to object to do some duties your employer may request you to do. I obviously understand that if most of the duties involved in my job are against my belief I cannot expect to be relieved from all of them, and I should just not accept the job or quit. But if there are just a limited number of duties involving going against my beliefs why shouldn't I be legally allowed to request not to be assigned to those duties?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: above
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not if he/she wants to keep his/her job.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Uganda
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can just see where this is going,
Crew refusing to carry race horses because they think its cruel to race them and keep them in boxes, crew refusing to carry wild animals because the do not agree with animals being kept in cages in zoos, refusing to carry hatching eggs because the chicks might be kept in confined spaces, then there will be the ones that wont carry live fish because the dont agree with keeping fish in tanks or ponds, etc etc, Its part of the job, accept it or go fly SLF!
Crew refusing to carry race horses because they think its cruel to race them and keep them in boxes, crew refusing to carry wild animals because the do not agree with animals being kept in cages in zoos, refusing to carry hatching eggs because the chicks might be kept in confined spaces, then there will be the ones that wont carry live fish because the dont agree with keeping fish in tanks or ponds, etc etc, Its part of the job, accept it or go fly SLF!
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
animals destined to a cruel death
But as you said it was in Western Europe you must know that it is illegal to put animals to a cruel death so the situation is just not going to arise, is it?
Even so, no-one can stop you asking your employer to relieve you of any duty you don't want to do. But do it more than once - or - for the reasons you appear to have chosen, even less than that, and your boss is going to think (quite understandably) that he has a nutter on his hands, and you'll soon find yourself with more time off than you'd planned for.
What's next? Veggie pilots refusing duty because there's meat in the co-pilot's dinner?
ps. What's an "orango"?
Last edited by Agaricus bisporus; 14th Jul 2009 at 13:09.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: A parallel universe.
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its part of the job, accept it or go fly SLF!
Who knows, when you fly SLF you could be carrying one of those people who work with animals in labs on board your aircraft. What are you going to to then indupilot? Kick this person off your flight?
According to you "this has nothing to do with my question," but the fact is that you can't start making emotional and personal judgements about legal cargo and passengers.
Legally IMHO you won't have a foot to stand on if you refuse to fly, so you better either do the honorable thing and resign if you can't stand it, or put up with it and try to change things on the legal front.
I've met pilots who have been asked to fly live animals... they didn't like doing it either because of the smell and noise, or because they suspected what was going to happen to the animals upon their arrival.
They voiced their opinions to the operator, but knew that they couldn't refuse to perform the flight on those grounds... so they did it grudgingly.
No real difference to flying munitions of war around the world, if you don't believe in that conflict. You do it because it's part of your job.
Breaking the law by flying certain cargoes is something different altogether.
They voiced their opinions to the operator, but knew that they couldn't refuse to perform the flight on those grounds... so they did it grudgingly.
No real difference to flying munitions of war around the world, if you don't believe in that conflict. You do it because it's part of your job.
Breaking the law by flying certain cargoes is something different altogether.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FWIW:
We carry the occasional shipment of live pigs.
We also have a large number of Muslim crewmembers, and basically avoid rostering them for such flights.
Sometimes it can't be avoided, thus posing a possible moral dilemma for the crewmember concerned.
An interesting issue.......................
We carry the occasional shipment of live pigs.
We also have a large number of Muslim crewmembers, and basically avoid rostering them for such flights.
Sometimes it can't be avoided, thus posing a possible moral dilemma for the crewmember concerned.
An interesting issue.......................
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Green Heart of Europe!
Age: 65
Posts: 235
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From the cargo manifest and the notification of special goods to the crew, how would you know the final outcome for the animals concerned?
A consignment is a consignment.
Cargo is cargo.
A consignment is a consignment.
Cargo is cargo.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I routinely carry large quantities of sewn products out of Central America. I am a contributor to the sweat-shop environment that creates these products. It does bother me and there is nothing I can do about it, other than quit.
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Belgium
Age: 62
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do we have an animal rights activist fishing for information on 'any law in any western Europe country that gives a pilot the right to refuse to transport live animals'
Certainly the tone (zealous) and content of the posts is indicative of someone with more than a passing knowledge of vivisection.
If so I would suggest that the subject has no place in an aviation forum. Furthermore I would caution against the dissemination of information to groups and/or individuals who commonly resort to violence and illegal acts to further their aims.
Certainly the tone (zealous) and content of the posts is indicative of someone with more than a passing knowledge of vivisection.
If so I would suggest that the subject has no place in an aviation forum. Furthermore I would caution against the dissemination of information to groups and/or individuals who commonly resort to violence and illegal acts to further their aims.
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Perhaps I'd misunderstood but I thought muslims weren't supposed to eat pig, I hadn't realised that they couldn't be in the vicinity of pigs as well.
I don't doubt that they'd prefer not to operate such flights, but does this pose a "moral dilemma"? I doubt it somehow. Has anyone asked them, or are we, as usual, making grossly inaccurate politically (in)correct assumptions based on ignorance and wishful (self damaging) thinking in subjects in which we have little, if any, real knowledge? (Like the idiotic rationale for not mentioning Christmas because it might offend - which is demonstrably hokum)
I can;t help thinking that we take far too much notice of imagined upsets caused to others, suggesting that there is a moral problem in carrying pax with a certain job description is tantamout to overt racism and is irrational, irresponsible and abhorrent to any right-minded person.
If people have such idiotic perjudices we should humour them perhaps (at best), but not let their daft ideas rule our behaviour.
After all, we have to inhabit the real world too...
I don't doubt that they'd prefer not to operate such flights, but does this pose a "moral dilemma"? I doubt it somehow. Has anyone asked them, or are we, as usual, making grossly inaccurate politically (in)correct assumptions based on ignorance and wishful (self damaging) thinking in subjects in which we have little, if any, real knowledge? (Like the idiotic rationale for not mentioning Christmas because it might offend - which is demonstrably hokum)
I can;t help thinking that we take far too much notice of imagined upsets caused to others, suggesting that there is a moral problem in carrying pax with a certain job description is tantamout to overt racism and is irrational, irresponsible and abhorrent to any right-minded person.
If people have such idiotic perjudices we should humour them perhaps (at best), but not let their daft ideas rule our behaviour.
After all, we have to inhabit the real world too...
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: bored
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Moral objections to cruelty
Congratulations for taking a moral stance on cruelty to animals. Even by posting here, you should take satisfaction that you are advancing the moral argument (in Northern Europe/Oz/NZ at least, where the centre of morality is centred - and the rest of the world eventually follows a few years behind).
But as others have said, all you can do at the moment is to refuse to fly the cargo - with the risk of being fired.
But bear in mind that often taking a morale stance, although it may lose you a job, can open doors in other careers.
My first flying "job" was dropping two sacks of Winalot dog-biscuits from a microlight onto the (two day starved) hounds of a fox-hunt in UK. The dogs sensibly all gave up the hunt for the free biscuits. I ended up with a criminal record - but it has been a great asset to me later in my career as it demonstrated my commitment to a worthwhile cause - to defend animals against torment for human pleasure..
But as others have said, all you can do at the moment is to refuse to fly the cargo - with the risk of being fired.
But bear in mind that often taking a morale stance, although it may lose you a job, can open doors in other careers.
My first flying "job" was dropping two sacks of Winalot dog-biscuits from a microlight onto the (two day starved) hounds of a fox-hunt in UK. The dogs sensibly all gave up the hunt for the free biscuits. I ended up with a criminal record - but it has been a great asset to me later in my career as it demonstrated my commitment to a worthwhile cause - to defend animals against torment for human pleasure..
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How on earth would I know what the cargo on board is intended for? Most of the time I don't even know what it is down there. If live animals are on board, would I know if the animals are going to a zoo, to be sold as pets, or to be released into the wilds of downtown Kansas City? I wouldn't know, nor would it be my place to ask.
I've carried unusual loads, ranging from weapons to equipment to animals to people (not much difference between the animals and the people) to cars, to things I can't talk about, to things I know nothing about. I've carried them into busy cities, rural areas, and combat zones. I'm not paid to decide who gets to fly or to determine what I can carry, save for making the determination of what is safe to carry.
Could I refuse to carry something? If it's unsafe, yes. If I don't like it? Sure, I could refuse...in lieu of submitting a letter of resignation.
I've carried unusual loads, ranging from weapons to equipment to animals to people (not much difference between the animals and the people) to cars, to things I can't talk about, to things I know nothing about. I've carried them into busy cities, rural areas, and combat zones. I'm not paid to decide who gets to fly or to determine what I can carry, save for making the determination of what is safe to carry.
Could I refuse to carry something? If it's unsafe, yes. If I don't like it? Sure, I could refuse...in lieu of submitting a letter of resignation.
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: California
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Huh??!!!
"Many people in the past have lost their jobs for refusing to be involved in "racist" duties such as denying access to public services or to shops to black or Jewish people. If all those people had adopted your methods the world today would be much worse. "
Excuse me, but exactly are MY METHODS??!! Your examples are those of an extremest. I feel badly for you since there is no way that you may find happiness in a world where people eat animals. I surely hope you don't wear leather shoes...
Excuse me, but exactly are MY METHODS??!! Your examples are those of an extremest. I feel badly for you since there is no way that you may find happiness in a world where people eat animals. I surely hope you don't wear leather shoes...
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CirrusF. This is a Professional pilots forum. Anyone who commits criminal acts by dropping objects from an aircraft is neither Professional nor a decent pilot. Anyone who crows about having a criminal record, or using it to progress their criminal career is simply beyond the pale.
I think you've proved you're disqualified to partake in a discussion such as this.
Go away, you don't belong here among honest decent people.
I think you've proved you're disqualified to partake in a discussion such as this.
Go away, you don't belong here among honest decent people.