PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Fragrant Harbour (https://www.pprune.org/fragrant-harbour-19/)
-   -   now KLM and Ba banned for two weeks. (https://www.pprune.org/fragrant-harbour/637370-now-klm-ba-banned-two-weeks.html)

Oasis 11th Dec 2020 20:14

now KLM and Ba banned for two weeks.
 
Win for Cathay?
All seems a little draconian to me.
Weren't these people tested before getting onboard? False positive, false negative aside, how is this the airlines' fault if proper procedures are followed?

cxflog 11th Dec 2020 20:44

What happens when Cathay eventually has someone test positive and they get banned?
I agree this seems a bit silly since a lot of it is out of the airlines control

JMock 11th Dec 2020 21:10

the Nethlands is a low risk country so no requirement for a pre boarding check. Assume the pax lied about being in a LRC for 14 days and this fact could have been garnered by proper checking of paperwork/ passport

Oasis 11th Dec 2020 21:59

Thanks for the explanation, although looking at the numbers and they way the Dutch have dealt with their little Covid-19 adventure, I wouldn’t Class them as low risk.. that aside, same for the U.K.?

JMock 11th Dec 2020 22:15

the U.K. is a High Risk Country so need a negative test to board.
there is a v efficient testing facility at LHR

Oasis 11th Dec 2020 22:39

So how is it BA’s fault that a covid negative person boards and then offloads in Hong Kong covid positive?

Can’t see the logic in that.

Clueless In CLK 11th Dec 2020 22:46

Won't belong before CX get banned flying home also

JMock 11th Dec 2020 22:50

indeed. Beggars belief

Rie 11th Dec 2020 23:29

Yet CX has 7 cases in the same period... Logical

JMock 11th Dec 2020 23:53

" As a passenger flight (BA027) operated by British Airways (BA) arriving from London of the United Kingdom to Hong Kong on December 8 had four passengers confirmed to have COVID-19 through specimens collected at the DH's Temporary Specimen Collection Centre (TSCC) while one passenger failed to comply with requirements specified under the Prevention and Control of Disease (Regulation of Cross-boundary Conveyances and Travellers) Regulation (Cap. 599H), the DH thus invoked the regulation to prohibit landing of passenger flights from London operated by BA in Hong Kong from December 12 to 25, 2020."
Source : HK government news website

here’s the govt reasoning

mngmt mole 11th Dec 2020 23:59

It's difficult to imagine a more foolish and incompetent HK Govt. than this one...

MENELAUS 12th Dec 2020 00:58

Writ large. Next will be banning CX from operating from its home port. !

Oasis 12th Dec 2020 08:07

JMock

Why wasn't this picked up during testing in London? False negative?
If this happens to Cathay, that's a two week grounding of the entire airline..

zerograv 12th Dec 2020 13:26

Needless to say that there is BS politics involved in this story.

If the UK and Netherlands apply reciprocity, it will go a great deal forward towards getting the issue solved.

Krone 12th Dec 2020 13:51

Oasis

I wont shed a tear if this happens . Hopefully the Europeans will retaliate and prevent cx from flying to the EU. Period.
After all, asian airlines were the major driving force behind the global spread of the disease way back in January .

CodyBlade 13th Dec 2020 04:36

The key word here is 'ASYMTOMATIC' .

Sick with no symptoms.

Backupnav 13th Dec 2020 04:58

The key letter is 'P'.

zerograv 13th Dec 2020 13:15


Originally Posted by swh (Post 10946117)
For reciprocity to be in effect, they would need to implement testing of everyone on arrival which is not being done.

Not necessarily. Believe it can be a lot simpler than that.

Would hazard the following "politically correct" response from the UK, or the Netherlands, to Hong Kong.

"Given that according to your verdict our Covid testing produced a failure result, it would be pointless to continue with, for instance, CX flights from the UK to Hong Kong, given that the passengers on those flight will still be tested by our test providers, which, and according to your verdict, are failing in the Covid testing being provided."

mngmt mole 13th Dec 2020 14:31

Well I for one completely agree with the ban. It's not like this is a virus that 99% of the people infected recover from...oh, wait :hmm:

Oasis 14th Dec 2020 06:00

mngmt mole

Disappointed you’re in THAT camp of thought.
if there is a widespread outbreak in Hong Kong and everyone in Hong Kong got covid, not only would 80000 people die, by your calculations, more would die due to lack of hospital services.

not to mention long covid.

Nothing to sneeze at, pun intended.

but yea, the ban is silly


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:57.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.