PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Fragrant Harbour (https://www.pprune.org/fragrant-harbour-19/)
-   -   DSS Resignation (https://www.pprune.org/fragrant-harbour/617904-dss-resignation.html)

NoAndThen 1st Feb 2019 14:59

DSS Resignation
 
Where is it?

With this stinging rebuke of DSS, where is his resignation letter? He is completely out of his depth and absolutely the wrong man to lead the AOA if that is even what you want to call these past couple years. He has shown he is even more out of touch with the pilots than the DFO. How has this management pilot checker even been allowed to run the AOA in the first place? Change starts from within and it's long past time for him to go. With a 10 year escalation ban in this last offer that DSS wholeheartedly was trying to ram through, we were on the edge of the end of the HKAOA. Never before can CX management say they've ever been that close.

Step down now. An absolute disgrace.

mngmt mole 1st Feb 2019 18:41

Everyone. I completely disagreed with DS’s aporoach. Even more so his recommendation. However, lets now give him a period of time to do the honorable thing. Lets all stop the name calling. We have bigger things to deal with. I believe DS will recognize he’s lost his mandate to lead the AOA.

cxorcist 1st Feb 2019 19:02


Originally Posted by mngmt mole (Post 10377642)
Everyone. I completely disagreed with DS’s aporoach. Even more so his recommendation. However, lets now give him a period of time to do the honorable thing. Lets all stop the name calling. We have bigger things to deal with. I believe DS will recognize he’s lost his mandate to lead the AOA.

Agreed. There is no positive way forward for DSS except to resign. The same applies to the GC members whom supported this failed TA.

rhoshamboe 1st Feb 2019 23:35

I voted no.If you clowns that are screaming for resignations aren't the first to put yourselves forward to lead or serve on the committee you will be displaying the same lack of backbone you accuse the GC of having. If you are not going to put your hand up, stop.

cxorcist 2nd Feb 2019 00:13


Originally Posted by rhoshamboe (Post 10377805)
I voted no.If you clowns that are screaming for resignations aren't the first to put yourselves forward to lead or serve on the committee you will be displaying the same lack of backbone you accuse the GC of having. If you are not going to put your hand up, stop.

This is a ridiculous comment. The membership deserves to have a GC that represents the membership’s interests. Only 21% of the membership approved of this deal, and yet the Chairman and 65% of the GC endorsed it. That is NOT proportional representation. And before you throw it at me, I’ve done several years on the GC in the last decade, and I’ve never been a part of a failed TA, or even a close one.

rhoshamboe 2nd Feb 2019 00:45

You're right. Although I still stand by it, that post was more emotive than rational. I agree that the membership do deserve a GC that represent their interests, and I think you would be hard pressed to find one GC member that thought they were doing anything other than that.
The membership has spoken rather emphatically. In my opinion, seeing whether the GC take that on board and pivot accordingly before conducting a wholesale lynching makes a lot more sense.
To be honest I don't think it's something you'll need to worry about. After the vitriol being levelled at the GC and NC now I'm not sure they'll want to continue. I hope we don't find ourselves in the same position as the company, having trainers who really shouldn't be there only because no-one suited to the job will do it.

ACMS 2nd Feb 2019 00:52

The way you guys carry on you’re lucky anyone bothers to represent you at all.

Walk the walk....

Samsonite 2nd Feb 2019 01:43

Yes totally agree with ACM... Who would want to represent a bunch of people who won't back anything up but want industrial action and then go on a whitch hunt after the ones that do represent. They brought you what they could get off the table, don't blame them.. Be very nervous about the loud people who talk a big game but have never done a good thing for the HKAOA and say they can lead or represent.

Great so you voted it down, now what? ohh you are waiting for someone to hold your hand to the industrial confrontation. Good luck!!

snoop doggy dog 2nd Feb 2019 02:02

The training department is the first layer of management.

Anyone that is paid a little extra by the company, will do disproportionately more to help management than they are paid.

Union Busters 101.

SASD209 2nd Feb 2019 02:08


Originally Posted by Samsonite (Post 10377867)

Great so you voted it down, now what?


...And this is the great question and takeaway from this: what now?? Go ahead, I'll wait..

mngmt mole 2nd Feb 2019 04:01

.....oh, here we go...the inevitable lynchings. Everyone, stop, take a breath and regroup. Firstly, our membership has spoken. Let's at least wait for DS to respond with his formal statement. Most of us feel he isn't the right person to lead the AOA any further, but for heavens sake, I know him personally and he is a good and well-meaning person. He just badly misjudged the depth of resistance to the company's proposal. Let him (and the rest of the GC) recognise the level of their failing and then respond. We need others to rise up to the challenge, and forming a lynch mob is hardly the way to encourage new people to put their names forward. Let's give a decent interval for matters to simmer down and then let's see what results. Ultimately, DS and his group are a spent force, but I don't intend on seeing him and the others castigated for all time. No matter our feelings about the TA and their role in it's recent history, the GC and DS are still professional colleagues. They lost (rightly in my opinion), but now let's not gloat in their defeat. The same applies to the company. Give every party the opportunity to "save face". We will only ultimately lose if we regress to arrogance and smugness. I've seen enough of that from our management over the years, and it has always stuck me that that is the main reason they constantly miscalculate. Let's not emulate them. We have the moral high ground, let's not throw it away. Sit on your hands over the weekend and then let's enter next week with a new and righteous resolve to see this through to a successful end.

plainpilot11 2nd Feb 2019 04:25

I think it’s more that it doesn’t seem our leadership (DS) in the AOA thinks we have anything left to give, or fight with. Our leadership should show some determination. Some spine. Some guts. Some belief in its membership. Some hope. And that’s the troubling part. He just doesn’t.

okm 2nd Feb 2019 06:13

Bring back Rod.

Roy De Kantzow 2nd Feb 2019 07:36


Originally Posted by rhoshamboe (Post 10377805)
I voted no.If you clowns that are screaming for resignations aren't the first to put yourselves forward to lead or serve on the committee you will be displaying the same lack of backbone you accuse the GC of having. If you are not going to put your hand up, stop.

Complete nonsense.

Members pay good money to be in the HKAOA and have every right to criticise a leadership that isn't representative and isn't doing what is required.

Criticising doesn't mean a member immediately has to put their name forward to be on the GC. This argument makes no sense. When we criticise politicians, we don't immediately say 'OK you run for Prime Minister then'.

Ridiculous POV.

unitedabx 2nd Feb 2019 08:33


Originally Posted by mngmt mole (Post 10377642)
Everyone. I completely disagreed with DS’s aporoach. Even more so his recommendation. However, lets now give him a period of time to do the honorable thing. Lets all stop the name calling. We have bigger things to deal with. I believe DS will recognize he’s lost his mandate to lead the AOA.

Resignation letter in on Monday morning or kick him out at lunchtime. GC too.

broadband circuit 2nd Feb 2019 12:13


Bring back Rod.
Be careful what you wish for.

You may like his politics and industrial direction, however ask some of the people who were either GC members or SMEs during his tenure about his leadership style.

unitedabx 2nd Feb 2019 14:56


Originally Posted by broadband circuit (Post 10378222)


Be careful what you wish for.

You may like his politics and industrial direction, however ask some of the people who were either GC members or SMEs during his tenure about his leadership style.

At least he showed leadership. DS shows nothing but self interest. Kick him OUT.

Frogman1484 2nd Feb 2019 15:13


Originally Posted by unitedabx (Post 10378331)
At least he showed leadership. DS shows nothing but self interest. Kick him OUT.

Stalin also showed leadership...we do not want Rod back!

Samsonite 2nd Feb 2019 16:23

Oh thats a good idea, Vote Rod back, the guy who basically trashed Cos16 because he didn't understand half the stuff in it. Funny how people forget how he dropped the ball on the best deal we had been offered in years.

spleener 2nd Feb 2019 23:14


Originally Posted by mngmt mole (Post 10377907)
.....oh, here we go...the inevitable lynchings. Everyone, stop, take a breath and regroup. Firstly, our membership has spoken. Let's at least wait for DS to respond with his formal statement. Most of us feel he isn't the right person to lead the AOA any further, but for heavens sake, I know him personally and he is a good and well-meaning person. He just badly misjudged the depth of resistance to the company's proposal. Let him (and the rest of the GC) recognise the level of their failing and then respond. We need others to rise up to the challenge, and forming a lynch mob is hardly the way to encourage new people to put their names forward. Let's give a decent interval for matters to simmer down and then let's see what results. Ultimately, DS and his group are a spent force, but I don't intend on seeing him and the others castigated for all time. No matter our feelings about the TA and their role in it's recent history, the GC and DS are still professional colleagues. They lost (rightly in my opinion), but now let's not gloat in their defeat. The same applies to the company. Give every party the opportunity to "save face". We will only ultimately lose if we regress to arrogance and smugness. I've seen enough of that from our management over the years, and it has always stuck me that that is the main reason they constantly miscalculate. Let's not emulate them. We have the moral high ground, let's not throw it away. Sit on your hands over the weekend and then let's enter next week with a new and righteous resolve to see this through to a successful end.


+1.
This is not a time for playing into the company's hands. Stay cool, allow due process, and keep the lynching hysteria for the bar.

morningcoffee 3rd Feb 2019 00:07

The NC would have a lot easier job negotiating with the company if the membership would step things up. Sadly with a spineless membership we vote no and then do absolutely everything but step it up. We ditch DS because he suggested we need to grow a pair?
If this is anything like TA16 the company won’t offer anything else and only 10 guys a month will leave unlike the hundreds a month that everyone talks about. Seen how many have resigned from the AOA recently because they’ve left the company? CX will get around the training ban and save a truckload of money every time we vote down a payrise.

Next up we’ll bleat about more trainers needing to resign and push for a recruitment ban, anything to avoid actually doing anything ourselves.

We barely get enough to volunteer to fill the GC and no one wants the Presidents job. And idiots on here want them all gone.

Keyboard warriors.

iflylow 3rd Feb 2019 02:21

Morningcoffee, are you DSS? It would explain a lot. Please do the honorable thing and step down. If you weren't effective before, you certainly aren't effective now!

Samsonite 3rd Feb 2019 02:23

Morning Coffee, you are 100%

unitedabx 3rd Feb 2019 04:20


Originally Posted by morningcoffee (Post 10378683)
The NC would have a lot easier job negotiating with the company if the membership would step things up. Sadly with a spineless membership we vote no and then do absolutely everything but step it up. We ditch DS because he suggested we need to grow a pair?
If this is anything like TA16 the company won’t offer anything else and only 10 guys a month will leave unlike the hundreds a month that everyone talks about. Seen how many have resigned from the AOA recently because they’ve left the company? CX will get around the training ban and save a truckload of money every time we vote down a payrise.

Next up we’ll bleat about more trainers needing to resign and push for a recruitment ban, anything to avoid actually doing anything ourselves.

We barely get enough to volunteer to fill the GC and no one wants the Presidents job. And idiots on here want them all gone.

Keyboard warriors.


MC your worst fears are keeping you awake at night. The membership and thankfully a very large percentage of relatively new employees have rejected your threats and intimdation. Your lapdog president and GC are disgraced and no longer command the respect or loyalty of the members. They are therefore ideal candidates for 3rd floor FOP jobs and are probably calling in your promises today. Monday sees you at a 10 am meeting called by RH ( who flew back from London ) where you will either be given your marching orders and thrown back to line operations ( God help you there ) or you will be told to brace yourself for years more of struggle. Is it really worth that to you. Your extra 20% buys your contempt and distrust by every pilot in the company. Your third floor desk a tombstone to your career. Your're finished and you don't even know it.

mngmt mole 3rd Feb 2019 11:09

MC is busy looking for a new job. Or at least he should be. Having said that, i'll miss his comical attempts to impersonate a pilot, and his rather frantic and hysterical posts attempting to manipulate the votes of real pilots. Either way, he is nothing but noise on this website.

Samsonite 3rd Feb 2019 16:34

Votes are nothing without action and you shouldn't have to be lead by the hand to do that, I don't see anything happening. That is the state of this group of employees, all talk, no action, always blaming someone else, scared to stand up for themselves and always want someone else to do the dirty work for them.

unitedabx 4th Feb 2019 02:31


Originally Posted by Samsonite (Post 10379197)
Votes are nothing without action and you shouldn't have to be lead by the hand to do that, I don't see anything happening. That is the state of this group of employees, all talk, no action, always blaming someone else, scared to stand up for themselves and always want someone else to do the dirty work for them.

The worm has turned. For the first time the pilots have OVERWHELMINGLY rejected a company offer and the AOA recommendation to accept it. This is new territory for the management and will need a new approach and departure from their victorian management style. Unfortunately, their entire management team was brought up on such a style so a change is needed from top to toe. Watch this space. The pilots need to just sit tight. Aeroplanes can fly without managers, checkin staff, admin people, cabin crew and directors but they can't fly without PILOTS and CX is still an airline ( just ) and needs planes in the sky.

plainpilot11 4th Feb 2019 03:56

Why resign when you’re taking in around 100k HKD on top of your salary (plus whatever the company’s bought them all off for) for crafting a few letters now and then. Can you believe that the Chairman makes that much?? Time maybe we all had a rethink about what that position is worth. Surely not that much. Maybe it’s been abused so much now and in the past for a reason.

turnandburn 4th Feb 2019 04:02

This is like a bad CNN loop.
Now we have MB off the big twin proposing motions seconded by JFK. The same guy who called the company on his leave day to save the day and to operate back from oztralia and the committee tuned a blind eye to it.Was duly reported, and now proposing motions. What a joke. Some are apparently exempt from it. Wish I was in that club. CC is a minor inconvenience at best.

Xwindldg 4th Feb 2019 04:58

Where were all the keyboard warriors last election challenging DS? Hiding away like little pu##ies!!
Step up and lead us forward to the 20% payrise that is obviously just around the corner!
RF was militant but he was voted out. Now everyone is complaining that DS isn’t militant.
That only thing we know for sure is we won’t be getting more money for a longer time. How have we won?
All the crazy motions being put forward make us look like a bunch of complete idiots. Most of them wouldn’t be legal but old mate keeps persisting on with them anyway.

main_dog 4th Feb 2019 06:43

It’s a poker game, with imperfect information. We didn’t fold, and are instead calling their bluff. Frankly there was so little on the plate it was an easy choice. We’ll see their hand soon enough.

Breathe, xwindlg.

OK4Wire 4th Feb 2019 06:58

You're right, Xw, this did indeed

make us look like a bunch of complete idiots
, the difference is that the "us" you're referring to is not the pilot body.

Oasis 4th Feb 2019 07:02


Originally Posted by Xwindldg (Post 10379625)
Where were all the keyboard warriors last election challenging DS? Hiding away like little pu##ies!!
Step up and lead us forward to the 20% payrise that is obviously just around the corner!
RF was militant but he was voted out. Now everyone is complaining that DS isn’t militant.
That only thing we know for sure is we won’t be getting more money for a longer time. How have we won?
All the crazy motions being put forward make us look like a bunch of complete idiots. Most of them wouldn’t be legal but old mate keeps persisting on with them anyway.

ds was voted in because rf and gf split the vote. Rf and gf both combined had more votes than just ds.
Or so I’ve been told at least.

Xwindldg 4th Feb 2019 08:36

RF + GF got more votes, that proves nothing. I’m sure if you added the votes of all losing candidates in any kind of vote they would equal more than the winner.

Where was the flood of hardened expert negotiators and union leaders during the last election? There are obviously lots in the AOA going by the forums. You can bet these same warriors will be uncontactable or away from Hong Kong in the event of any IA escalation event. DS actually talks about it and these same brave warriors lose their minds in outrage. Hilarious!

Air Profit 4th Feb 2019 11:59

Xwindldg, I see you and MC are flailing all over the forums desperately trying to sow dissension. Not only are you transparently company lap dogs, but you lost. Lost big. Get over it and perhaps try and find a job your mother would actually be proud of you for. Working 12 hours a day in your Swire cubicle must be soul destroying. Why don't the two of you just resign and go on holiday together, somewhere your morals and outlook will make you welcome, like Venezuela.

morningcoffee 5th Feb 2019 13:44


Originally Posted by Air Profit (Post 10379957)
Xwindldg, I see you and MC are flailing all over the forums desperately trying to sow dissension. Not only are you transparently company lap dogs, but you lost. Lost big. Get over it and perhaps try and find a job your mother would actually be proud of you for. Working 12 hours a day in your Swire cubicle must be soul destroying. Why don't the two of you just resign and go on holiday together, somewhere your morals and outlook will make you welcome, like Venezuela.

Where to begin. Pilots have won nothing, they won nothing back when they rejected TA16 and a 6% payrise. I’ve lost count of how many, like yourself, bleated on about a better offer turning up. And they’re still bleating on.
The company offered crap because the members won’t step up. 3 years from now it will be 7 years without a payrise. And AOA members like yourself will be pushing for a change to the lanyard colour.
So brave. You want to guess how much all these no votes save the company?

mngmt mole 5th Feb 2019 14:52

Bit late to be typing away in your cubicle isnt it MC? Either we work for CX under a proper contract, or we will work for another company that does. What we won’t do is sell out our dignity and integrity and end up as the type of person you obviously are.

mngmt mole 5th Feb 2019 14:55

.....and in case you missed it. The NO vote was much larger this time around than for the previous TA. That says about everything that needs saying about the Swire’s and their management mindset. Someone like you simply will never get it. Without integrity a d character you never will.

Kitsune 5th Feb 2019 21:39

That would be the dignity integrity and character that allowed 49 (51) of your colleagues to be sacked with no comeback, let alone a strike vote then? That episode besmirches the dignity integrity and character of every pilot employed by CX at that time, bar none.

Tea time 5th Feb 2019 22:01

Sadly the pilot body doesn’t have the stomach to walk , maybe one day they will summon up the courage , but for now the derisory offer from the company made it very easy to say no . It wasn’t a hard decision at all ,1% of sweet F’A is still F’A


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:51.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.