Progress Wan Chai.
A very interesting angle. Gave me food for thought, :ok:
|
Thanks Tea time.
Having now read the post, I can't see why MH got so upset. It's the real truth of what we're putting up with on the line every day. Unless of course MH doesn't want to hear the truth...... |
"The UK fatigue expert involved with the survey commented that he had not seen an airline with such complexity in rostering" GMF. HC. If the "expert" had not seen something like CX before, probably means they never seen any mainline airline before. |
Originally Posted by Eyes only
(Post 9142806)
When PWC came in they said the CX operation was simple and easy to implement a new computerised rostering system compared to other like American Airlines which have far more bases, and aircraft types, flights, destinations, and passengers, FAA, and negotiated rules.
If the "expert" had not seen something like CX before, probably means they never seen any mainline airline before. Perhaps he meant a system that was so simple yet had been made overly complex for no good reason. |
It's what you DON'T say that they find interesting. You have to hand it to them, they have mastered the art of corporate villainy. In fact, I think Swire might have written that manual. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:12. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.