AOA Casual Vacancies
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: HKSAR
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AOA Casual Vacancies
I normally do not get bothered by union stuff as I have became a non caring paying member since POS18, but the recent nomination takes me back to making a point in my recent flights.
There are two members of the current casual vacancies nominations who were part of GC at the time of TA18, and were part of the 9 who sued a AOA member (JR) for defamation and demanded he paid 50000HKD each (450000HKD) as compensation, using membership’s lawyers. This stemmed from JR questioning and criticising the GC in the AOA forum for their conduct in pushing TA18 to the membership. JR then had to use his own money to hire lawyers to defend himself against the 9. The outcome of which is unknown but the true colours of these plaintiffs were shown. Please for all our sake do not have a short memory and just vote in whoever puts their hands up. There are serious division within the AOA at the moment, but some are genuinely fighting to move forward to a new era of cost savings and having productive welfare for the membership as a whole. Meaningful voting of candidates counts towards making things happen.
For those that want the names and history please read up in the AOA forum. I will not disclose the names here.
There are two members of the current casual vacancies nominations who were part of GC at the time of TA18, and were part of the 9 who sued a AOA member (JR) for defamation and demanded he paid 50000HKD each (450000HKD) as compensation, using membership’s lawyers. This stemmed from JR questioning and criticising the GC in the AOA forum for their conduct in pushing TA18 to the membership. JR then had to use his own money to hire lawyers to defend himself against the 9. The outcome of which is unknown but the true colours of these plaintiffs were shown. Please for all our sake do not have a short memory and just vote in whoever puts their hands up. There are serious division within the AOA at the moment, but some are genuinely fighting to move forward to a new era of cost savings and having productive welfare for the membership as a whole. Meaningful voting of candidates counts towards making things happen.
For those that want the names and history please read up in the AOA forum. I will not disclose the names here.
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It’s desperately important to make votes count. The last casual vacancy has seen a fantastic new chairwoman come to the fore but, sadly, recruit some who appear to have effectively frozen any GC progress by their obstructive ways.
I normally do not get bothered by union stuff as I have became a non caring paying member since POS18, but the recent nomination takes me back to making a point in my recent flights.
There are two members of the current casual vacancies nominations who were part of GC at the time of TA18, and were part of the 9 who sued a AOA member (JR) for defamation and demanded he paid 50000HKD each (450000HKD) as compensation, using membership’s lawyers. This stemmed from JR questioning and criticising the GC in the AOA forum for their conduct in pushing TA18 to the membership. JR then had to use his own money to hire lawyers to defend himself against the 9. The outcome of which is unknown but the true colours of these plaintiffs were shown. Please for all our sake do not have a short memory and just vote in whoever puts their hands up. There are serious division within the AOA at the moment, but some are genuinely fighting to move forward to a new era of cost savings and having productive welfare for the membership as a whole. Meaningful voting of candidates counts towards making things happen.
For those that want the names and history please read up in the AOA forum. I will not disclose the names here.
There are two members of the current casual vacancies nominations who were part of GC at the time of TA18, and were part of the 9 who sued a AOA member (JR) for defamation and demanded he paid 50000HKD each (450000HKD) as compensation, using membership’s lawyers. This stemmed from JR questioning and criticising the GC in the AOA forum for their conduct in pushing TA18 to the membership. JR then had to use his own money to hire lawyers to defend himself against the 9. The outcome of which is unknown but the true colours of these plaintiffs were shown. Please for all our sake do not have a short memory and just vote in whoever puts their hands up. There are serious division within the AOA at the moment, but some are genuinely fighting to move forward to a new era of cost savings and having productive welfare for the membership as a whole. Meaningful voting of candidates counts towards making things happen.
For those that want the names and history please read up in the AOA forum. I will not disclose the names here.
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Genuine question. What does the AOA actually achieves on behalf of its members in 2022?
For instance, my COS have been casually amended to our detriment by the company several times in the past twelve months. Was the AOA consulted or informed and able to resist?
At a very basic level, if a union has zero influence on the way our contracts are devised and revised, then I’m afraid the rest is just superfluous.
For instance, my COS have been casually amended to our detriment by the company several times in the past twelve months. Was the AOA consulted or informed and able to resist?
At a very basic level, if a union has zero influence on the way our contracts are devised and revised, then I’m afraid the rest is just superfluous.
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Back of Beyond
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm hearing good things about Daphne. With the huge exodus happening, and more to come with the end of housing/schooling, if CX actually survives this bat flu idiocy, the AOA might very well find itself in a decent bargaining position...
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Wan Chai
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AOA has no power to bargain anything with 800 cadets in the pipeline and enough direct entry captains from SEA and the subcontinent willing to fill a job. If any of these potentials are willing to accept the abhorrent conditions in other countries getting paid POS18 will be a step up.
In the end CX doesn't need the gweilo anymore. You never know, maybe the barriers to the north get brought down because HK after all is now just another Chinese city...
In the end CX doesn't need the gweilo anymore. You never know, maybe the barriers to the north get brought down because HK after all is now just another Chinese city...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: HKSAR
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Genuine question. What does the AOA actually achieves on behalf of its members in 2022?
For instance, my COS have been casually amended to our detriment by the company several times in the past twelve months. Was the AOA consulted or informed and able to resist?
At a very basic level, if a union has zero influence on the way our contracts are devised and revised, then I’m afraid the rest is just superfluous.
For instance, my COS have been casually amended to our detriment by the company several times in the past twelve months. Was the AOA consulted or informed and able to resist?
At a very basic level, if a union has zero influence on the way our contracts are devised and revised, then I’m afraid the rest is just superfluous.
Last edited by Whiteteanosugar; 10th Apr 2022 at 14:40.
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Genuine question. What does the AOA actually achieves on behalf of its members in 2022?
For instance, my COS have been casually amended to our detriment by the company several times in the past twelve months. Was the AOA consulted or informed and able to resist?
At a very basic level, if a union has zero influence on the way our contracts are devised and revised, then I’m afraid the rest is just superfluous.
For instance, my COS have been casually amended to our detriment by the company several times in the past twelve months. Was the AOA consulted or informed and able to resist?
At a very basic level, if a union has zero influence on the way our contracts are devised and revised, then I’m afraid the rest is just superfluous.
1 The members are not united or prepared to strike this was very obvious in 99 and hasn’t changed since . This weakens any bargaining strength the AOA has
2 The GC hasn’t been very good at negotiating for the reasons in 1 above .
‘the union is only as strong as the weakest members
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Wan Chai
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gone are the days of 23.5k++ a month all in. New salary is around $4000 basic at many of the airlines.