Suggestion Box
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: one country, one system
Age: 55
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Suggestion Box
- solutions only
- should define benefit to the company
- feasible and legal (best of knowlege)
- no personal attacks or insults
CX only, can't comment on KA
All S/O's, JFO's offer of 12 months voluntary leave with monthly allowance of 10k. If bound to a rental contract, company will pay the full rent. Officers with children can decline and will not be counted in terms of the min acceptance rate. FOC tickets plus headland available for voluntary simulator checks. Earlier recall on voluntary base possible.
All based non-747 crew offer of 12 months voluntary leave on 25% of salary.
Voluntary temporary cut of 10 % basic for 12 months for all crew.
Min required acceptance rate above 90% or further actions by the company.
Benefit: immediate recall available in case of recovery, future prospect of employment for S/O's, survival of basings
- should define benefit to the company
- feasible and legal (best of knowlege)
- no personal attacks or insults
CX only, can't comment on KA
All S/O's, JFO's offer of 12 months voluntary leave with monthly allowance of 10k. If bound to a rental contract, company will pay the full rent. Officers with children can decline and will not be counted in terms of the min acceptance rate. FOC tickets plus headland available for voluntary simulator checks. Earlier recall on voluntary base possible.
All based non-747 crew offer of 12 months voluntary leave on 25% of salary.
Voluntary temporary cut of 10 % basic for 12 months for all crew.
Min required acceptance rate above 90% or further actions by the company.
Benefit: immediate recall available in case of recovery, future prospect of employment for S/O's, survival of basings
Last edited by Sam Ting Wong; 26th Sep 2020 at 01:53.
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: uk
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
- solutions only
- should define benefit to the company
- feasible and legal (best of knowlege)
- no personal attacks or insults
CX only, can't comment on KA
All S/O's, JFO's offer of 12 months voluntary leave with monthly allowance of 10k. If bound to a rental contract, company will pay the full rent. Officers with children can decline and will not be counted in terms of the min acceptance rate. FOC tickets plus headland available for voluntary simulator checks. Earlier recall on voluntary base possible.
All based non-747 crew offer of 12 months voluntary leave on 25% of salary.
Voluntary temporary cut of 10 % basic for 12 months for all crew.
Min required acceptance rate above 90% or further actions by the company.
Benefit: immediate recall available in case of recovery, future prospect of employment for S/O's, survival of basings
- should define benefit to the company
- feasible and legal (best of knowlege)
- no personal attacks or insults
CX only, can't comment on KA
All S/O's, JFO's offer of 12 months voluntary leave with monthly allowance of 10k. If bound to a rental contract, company will pay the full rent. Officers with children can decline and will not be counted in terms of the min acceptance rate. FOC tickets plus headland available for voluntary simulator checks. Earlier recall on voluntary base possible.
All based non-747 crew offer of 12 months voluntary leave on 25% of salary.
Voluntary temporary cut of 10 % basic for 12 months for all crew.
Min required acceptance rate above 90% or further actions by the company.
Benefit: immediate recall available in case of recovery, future prospect of employment for S/O's, survival of basings
Stick to the contract. Last in, first out.
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: HKSAR
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SLS3. 6 months unpaid leave for ALL to be spread over 18 months (1/3 of salary cut for 18 months). ARAPA and HKPA remains to be paid throughout. SLS3 to be taken in 2 months or more instalments.
And STW I agree it would be a good idea to set an attribution rate, some people need some pressure to chip in.
Save all jobs if we can.
And STW I agree it would be a good idea to set an attribution rate, some people need some pressure to chip in.
Save all jobs if we can.
Last edited by Whiteteanosugar; 26th Sep 2020 at 05:06.
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am sorry to inform everyone, but it is a bit late to be providing comprehensive "solutions" to the companys problem. Needless to say, they have already baked their cake and the result is about to be presented to the membership. You are providing sensible suggestions, but it is too little too late. The result is already decided.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vermont
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: one country, one system
Age: 55
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Please keep it coming, without personal attacks or insults. Please.
Downsides of LIFO:
costs of severance, recruitment, re-training 747 crew plus the newjoiner later, possible shortcomings in case of rapid developments, downgrading of CN's necessary ( something not discussed yet I noticed) , human cost of hardship
Note that all affected by LIFO would still be the ones with the biggest burden, down to just 10k a month. But it would not be as brutal and terminal.
Not saying LIFO it is not a valid suggestion, just wondering if it is really the best. I was hoping for a creative and maybe innovative alternative. I do not suggest to break any contract, voluntary agreements only.
Downsides of LIFO:
costs of severance, recruitment, re-training 747 crew plus the newjoiner later, possible shortcomings in case of rapid developments, downgrading of CN's necessary ( something not discussed yet I noticed) , human cost of hardship
Note that all affected by LIFO would still be the ones with the biggest burden, down to just 10k a month. But it would not be as brutal and terminal.
Not saying LIFO it is not a valid suggestion, just wondering if it is really the best. I was hoping for a creative and maybe innovative alternative. I do not suggest to break any contract, voluntary agreements only.
Last edited by Sam Ting Wong; 26th Sep 2020 at 04:01.
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So Sam, conversely you are suggesting that they should ignore LIFO? It's ok to retain someone junior to someone senior? Is that what you are saying. Just asking. Without a contractual right to retain your job respective to someone junior to you, there is then categorically no value in your career. If you don't agree, then please explain.
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: 852
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Please keep it coming, without personal attacks or insults. Please.
Downsides of LIFO:
costs of severance, recruitment, re-training 747 crew plus the newjoiner later, possible shortcomings in case of rapid developments, downgrading of CN's necessary ( something not discussed yet I noticed) , human cost of hardship
Note that all affected by LIFO would still be the ones with the biggest burden, down to just 10k a month. But it would not be as brutal and terminal.
Not saying LIFO it is not a valid suggestion, just wondering if it is really the best. I was hoping for a creative and maybe innovative alternative. I do not suggest to break any contract, only voluntary agreements
Downsides of LIFO:
costs of severance, recruitment, re-training 747 crew plus the newjoiner later, possible shortcomings in case of rapid developments, downgrading of CN's necessary ( something not discussed yet I noticed) , human cost of hardship
Note that all affected by LIFO would still be the ones with the biggest burden, down to just 10k a month. But it would not be as brutal and terminal.
Not saying LIFO it is not a valid suggestion, just wondering if it is really the best. I was hoping for a creative and maybe innovative alternative. I do not suggest to break any contract, only voluntary agreements
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Rabbit Hutch
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LIFO has some immigration/legal ramifications as I’d imagine that you can’t keep someone who needs a visa and lay off someone who is PR. Some of the most junior are Locals/PR.
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: All over
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's impossible to circumvent LIFO on the master seniority list without significant litigation and a huge quagmire (and the litigation costs--in which you'll ultimately lose the case--will be extensive for the company while in some jurisdictions 'free' towards the plaintiffs). While the enforceability in HKG might be dubious elsewhere it would not be and you can't use 'tricks' to try to get around that in that all that information would be discoverable. Nor could you partially circumvent this by applying LIFO in one area and not in another because that would affect everyone (i.e. a partial LIFO only on the base but not in HKG would still affect those on a base so it'd still wind up in arbitration/court). There's simply no way around the provision.
SO
You're gonna need a voluntary scheme to comply with the contracts and one that attracts enough people to take it. That's really the only legal avenue before the reverse-seniority axe.
The break point (i.e. the point it'd be financially beneficial for retirement and permanent separation vs. simple layoff provisions) for most contracts is two years for a clean break (given the pay protection, AL, sick days, etc.). Medical in countries for a year or so might need to be added. This is similar to many (developed nations) scheme; I'd probably look towards Southwest for a model.
You might add a one year voluntary leave scheme (with recall) at 60-70%-ish pay (no housing or ancillary allowances, etc.; preserving medical and peripheral benefits in countries which need it) there as well. That'd get you recoverable assets when things pick back up a bit.
A straight layoff is 6 months' pay (with in-seniority recall rights) in most contracts so it has to be something better than this (i.e. it'd have to be better than a simple one year at half pay in that 6 months is half a year so a person would be better off to force layoffs).
Give this a try and then bring down the axe.
SO
You're gonna need a voluntary scheme to comply with the contracts and one that attracts enough people to take it. That's really the only legal avenue before the reverse-seniority axe.
The break point (i.e. the point it'd be financially beneficial for retirement and permanent separation vs. simple layoff provisions) for most contracts is two years for a clean break (given the pay protection, AL, sick days, etc.). Medical in countries for a year or so might need to be added. This is similar to many (developed nations) scheme; I'd probably look towards Southwest for a model.
You might add a one year voluntary leave scheme (with recall) at 60-70%-ish pay (no housing or ancillary allowances, etc.; preserving medical and peripheral benefits in countries which need it) there as well. That'd get you recoverable assets when things pick back up a bit.
A straight layoff is 6 months' pay (with in-seniority recall rights) in most contracts so it has to be something better than this (i.e. it'd have to be better than a simple one year at half pay in that 6 months is half a year so a person would be better off to force layoffs).
Give this a try and then bring down the axe.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: one country, one system
Age: 55
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So Sam, conversely you are suggesting that they should ignore LIFO? It's ok to retain someone junior to someone senior? Is that what you are saying. Just asking. Without a contractual right to retain your job respective to someone junior to you, there is then categorically no value in your career. If you don't agree, then please explain.
What I suggest is not to make anyone redundant in the first place, basically buying time by asking those potentially affected by LIFO to voluntarily accept 10k for a year etc (see first post).
Last edited by Sam Ting Wong; 26th Sep 2020 at 05:51.
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: World
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Major restructuring. Company and all contracts essentially ceases to exist and assets transferred to new company who picks who to re-hire.
Didn't take SLS? Out
On the 777 with 3 months of G days continuously? Out
Everyone on COS20. Don't like it? Too bad, get out
ARAPA gone. Can't afford your mega mansion anymore? Too bad, if you don't like it, leave
Locals protected over expats
If senior crew think their experience makes them bigger than god, bye bye.
Didn't take SLS? Out
On the 777 with 3 months of G days continuously? Out
Everyone on COS20. Don't like it? Too bad, get out
ARAPA gone. Can't afford your mega mansion anymore? Too bad, if you don't like it, leave
Locals protected over expats
If senior crew think their experience makes them bigger than god, bye bye.
Major restructuring. Company and all contracts essentially ceases to exist and assets transferred to new company who picks who to re-hire.
Didn't take SLS? Out
On the 777 with 3 months of G days continuously? Out
Everyone on COS20. Don't like it? Too bad, get out
ARAPA gone. Can't afford your mega mansion anymore? Too bad, if you don't like it, leave
Locals protected over expats
If senior crew think their experience makes them bigger than god, bye bye.
Didn't take SLS? Out
On the 777 with 3 months of G days continuously? Out
Everyone on COS20. Don't like it? Too bad, get out
ARAPA gone. Can't afford your mega mansion anymore? Too bad, if you don't like it, leave
Locals protected over expats
If senior crew think their experience makes them bigger than god, bye bye.
Although I would prefer LIFO as it would protect me more, but if I would be running a business I would do exactly what you suggest !!!!
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: The Forbidden City
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's impossible to circumvent LIFO on the master seniority list without significant litigation and a huge quagmire (and the litigation costs--in which you'll ultimately lose the case--will be extensive for the company while in some jurisdictions 'free' towards the plaintiffs)
.
.
This is exactly what they will use as a grounds for a fair dismissal (here’s your new contract, take it or leave it), and they have the full backing of any judge and court. The AOA knows this, the DPA knows this, all of them powerless, nothing to “negotiate”.
For them to even suggest 50% pay for a year is laughable.
In a previous post on another forum I mentioned how this is going to play out, the 49er fiasco can be used as a prelude:
Under probation - ciao
High sickness record - ciao
Poor performance - ciao
Failed upgrades - ciao
Outspoken on Social Media - ciao
Extra fuel/no RETI (no good reason) - ciao
then only do we get to LIFO (per fleet, per rank)
In a nutshell, anytime you cost them money, you’re a target - open season on 1 October.
Hold onto your underpants - it’s going to be a rough ride.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: one country, one system
Age: 55
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This thread was actually meant for constructive suggestions, not when to expect annihilation.
Think of it as trouble shooting in a catastrophic inflight situation.
Are you going to give up?
Creative solutions, please let us see them.
Thank you
Think of it as trouble shooting in a catastrophic inflight situation.
Are you going to give up?
Creative solutions, please let us see them.
Thank you
Last edited by Sam Ting Wong; 26th Sep 2020 at 07:30.
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Hong kong
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have looked this up a few times and according to a number of sources, you must have the force majure clause actually written into your contract, I do not have that written in what I signed.
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whilst I feel we should do all we can to save jobs, I am not prepared to see the contract and LIFO changed at all. If the numbers of pilot redundancies rumoured in local press are correct there is a real chance I might get the chop, I can accept it provided the terms of my recruitment, employment & contract are followed to the letter in the process. I will just be too Junior.
I guarantee not a single one of you when you signed your COS had a problem with LIFO, either because you never thought it would come to this but more likely because you all thought it was fair and more importantly knew it was the way it was done in the airline industry! For those of you advocating against LIFO are you also advocating against seniority based promotion? Because they are one and the same.
I guarantee not a single one of you when you signed your COS had a problem with LIFO, either because you never thought it would come to this but more likely because you all thought it was fair and more importantly knew it was the way it was done in the airline industry! For those of you advocating against LIFO are you also advocating against seniority based promotion? Because they are one and the same.
Last edited by LLLQNH; 26th Sep 2020 at 08:40.
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyway on the theme of the original topic
- In reverse seniority order as an alternative to permanent redundancy offer two years unpaid leave from Jan 1st 2021. Seniority and Longevity will still build (your increments will still build up and your DOJ for staff travel will remain as original DOH)
- One time payment of four months basic salary (saves the company two months they would pay out in the event of permanent redundancy)
- You remain an employee.
- Company have the option of an early return to flying duties with 3 months notice.
- In reverse seniority order as an alternative to permanent redundancy offer two years unpaid leave from Jan 1st 2021. Seniority and Longevity will still build (your increments will still build up and your DOJ for staff travel will remain as original DOH)
- One time payment of four months basic salary (saves the company two months they would pay out in the event of permanent redundancy)
- You remain an employee.
- Company have the option of an early return to flying duties with 3 months notice.