Anna & Rupert's pay..
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: HK
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anna & Rupert's pay..
Anna's
Stock Quotes & Company News | Reuters.com
Ruppy's
Stock Quotes & Company News | Reuters.com
Anyone else think that Rup's 4 million in housing is taking the piss?
Sorry Anna..
Reckon you need to sort your own proverbial houses out before coming after ours.
Stock Quotes & Company News | Reuters.com
Ruppy's
Stock Quotes & Company News | Reuters.com
Anyone else think that Rup's 4 million in housing is taking the piss?
Sorry Anna..
Reckon you need to sort your own proverbial houses out before coming after ours.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HedgeHogg takes $4.4m in housing. But that's easy to justify, because his boss Slowsir takes $6.75m. I guess both would justify the cost by saying that Housing in HK is expensive.... doh....
Perhaps the union that represents them should engage in CPS/HPE. That would see their Housing drop!!
Perhaps the union that represents them should engage in CPS/HPE. That would see their Housing drop!!
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: one country, one system
Age: 55
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am sure entire Hong Kong will come to a grinding halt when they learn about directors having a better package than employees.
Last edited by Sam Ting Wong; 10th Sep 2017 at 14:02.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: hong kong
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anna and Rupert are smart, CONGRATULATIONS, signing proper contracts.
Pilots have been signing inferior contracts for some 20 years, with the introduction of the B-scale (and the start of the rot) and NOW wondering what happened?
Pilots have been signing inferior contracts for some 20 years, with the introduction of the B-scale (and the start of the rot) and NOW wondering what happened?
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: the land of chocolate
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You'll never win the publicity war.
The only ones we have to convince is the board and management.
The only thing they react to is action. Look at what happened with the cabin crew a little while ago.
The only ones we have to convince is the board and management.
The only thing they react to is action. Look at what happened with the cabin crew a little while ago.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: HK
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You'll never win 100% of the battles you don't fight.
period.
The public perception of CX pilots has changed.
No longer is it the rich white gloved Pom. Once what you said was true. No more.
We're their brothers, and cousins. Husbands to their sisters.
Piloting in HK is becoming more local.
It's not banking.
The public hates CX executives. They don't hate the pilots or flight attendants.
period.
The public perception of CX pilots has changed.
No longer is it the rich white gloved Pom. Once what you said was true. No more.
We're their brothers, and cousins. Husbands to their sisters.
Piloting in HK is becoming more local.
It's not banking.
The public hates CX executives. They don't hate the pilots or flight attendants.
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Polar Route
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is that right? Rupert makes over 10B HKD per year? For what? Near as I can tell, he is destroying the Company with his ridiculous hedging and balance sheet and core product destruction. Must be wrong. No way he makes that much. If so, it's a complete joke given the puling they are doing about reducing costs.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Turning Finals, I agree which is why I called it asset stripping. Have a look at the link though and the renumeration is similar to Martin Murray which flies in the face of a typo. Please someone with an understanding of these matters explain .....
Young Rupert took one for the team when CNCO put one on their ships on the Great Barrier Reef. Don't begrudge him a few sheckles before he takes another one for the team
