US Military critical pilot shortage
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And now the general appears to have had a change of heart ? Or maybe it was a steep increase in his pilots submitting separation papers to beat the threatened "stop-loss" that would interfere with their chance of hitting the big US hiring surge on the upswing ? Amusing...
"The Air Force moved quickly last week to quell concerns that it would force pilots to stay in uniform beyond their agreed-to separation dates."
Stop-Loss Rejected By Air Force - AVweb flash Article
A bit more. Gee, do ya really think so ?:
"The Air Force feels that implementing a stop-loss policy would cause pilots to flee the Air Force before the door closed, and they won't stick around to see if things improve."
https://www.airforcetimes.com/articl...-retain-pilots
"The Air Force moved quickly last week to quell concerns that it would force pilots to stay in uniform beyond their agreed-to separation dates."
Stop-Loss Rejected By Air Force - AVweb flash Article
A bit more. Gee, do ya really think so ?:
"The Air Force feels that implementing a stop-loss policy would cause pilots to flee the Air Force before the door closed, and they won't stick around to see if things improve."
https://www.airforcetimes.com/articl...-retain-pilots
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: HK
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the difference is that the contract allows for stop loss orders, so it isn't a unilateral contract change, rather it would be the USAF exercising their rights under the contract. Again, I don't know the details of US military contracts, but my guess is that it can only be challenged under USMC and military courts, not via the civil court process
Using it in peace time is counter productive I agree. But I guess with the new aggression coming out of the US, they are preparing for the worst...
Using it in peace time is counter productive I agree. But I guess with the new aggression coming out of the US, they are preparing for the worst...
If you're referring to the USAF general quoted in several of these articles, I'm sure he's keenly interested in solving HIS problem. And his problem is not pilot supply in the private sector; I doubt he could care any less about that. He's only talking to the airline industry because that's a big source of HIS problem.
All the articles I've seen on this issue mention discussions between the airline industry and the military in an attempt to come to some agreement about military pilot attrition. There are opposing motives at work here: the military doesn't want to lose pilots...and the airlines want every one of the military's pilots...EVERY one of 'em ! Those differences are so wide I can't imagine what a compromise would be....other than interesting.
Pilot "sharing" ? They've been doing that as long as I've been aware via the reserves and national guard units with MLOA given to pilots as needed. I'd like to hear what the airline industry has to say about "part time" pilots under some sharing arrangement beyond the extent of what's already in place.
I also suggest that retention bonuses won't quite do it either unless they total in the millions (unlikely).
Of course, I'm merely an interested observer and my opinion is only worth what you paid for it (or maybe even less !).
Last edited by bafanguy; 18th Apr 2017 at 09:21.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How nice of you to encourage unilateral contract changes detrimental to the employees' careers, family life, and in this case, their actual probability of remaining alive. And by imposing a "policy" just like that - how convenient. Sound familiar?
Military pilots sign away many years of their lives in exchange for pilot training. For most, those many years (much longer than any other officers' contractual commitment in most countries, as far as I know) also comes with the very real risk of not being alive at the end (due to things like the more dangerous flying environment/style (high speed/low level/formation/extreme maneuvering/flying towards each other/etc.), the high performance/risky flying, and the high likelihood of real combat action - which also comes with the risk of imprisonment and/or torture and/or execution, etc.).
Military pilots also sign away their rights to decide where they and their family members will live, when they move, which type of work and flying they will do, which also affects the spouses' ability to work/earn/progress/be happy, kids' childhoods and educations, as well affecting everything else for everyone, from tv to sports to groceries to climate to friendships to - everything.
With most military pilots locked in at a young age to a lengthy, very binding contract, with severe penalties for breaking their contracts (serious imprisonment) and a multitude of additional rules, regulations and laws (military laws) long before they even complete flying/operation training (not knowing if they will fly, or what they will fly - which is much, much more significant to their work/family/futures/lifestyles/survival than whether they are 777/747/A50/etc. pilots - they have not just honored/honoured their side of the agreement, they have done so while graciously serving their countries, at great personal risk and sacrifice by them and their families, even with the "cool stuff" included for some (many get no cool stuff at all, just a raw deal).
How about just having both sides stick to the contract, and if one side needs help from the other side, then they can negotiate/offer an improvement instead of just unilaterally imposing changes that suit them at the moment, just because they think they can get away with it and it is cheaper. Sound familiar?
If the military demonstrates that it will cancel contracts unilaterally and simply impose far-reaching changes that are detrimental to the careers, lifestyles, livelihoods, families, futures and actual lives of its pilots (sound familiar?) then they can expect to have a real hard time getting the best candidates to apply, much less agree to join. This means that the military tradition and desire to select and recruit the best, top notch, top choice and top quality applicants from highly motivated, well educated, intelligent, desirable pools of wannabes with the most potential will still happen, but the new "top" picks will be seriously different in the new, degraded pool of wannabes consisting of a new, much lower overall quality of recruits going forward, forever. Sound familiar?
If the military improves the deal to the point where current pilots want to stay, then the problem will self-correct. For example, how many F-15 pilots would stay (vs. be racing to get their airline seniority number) if the military paid them $1M USD per year to stay after their contractual requirement, and guaranteed them $250K/year in retirement at some point after that? Too much/not enough? Then the market will determine the necessary numbers. The military could also allow its pilots to get hired at airlines, then assist and compensate those airlines (with $$$) and its pilots for resuming military service on short extensions while maintaining their airline seniority (something which already happens in the US to a great extent via the reserves/ANG, but could be better organized/formalized/etc.). Or the military could do nothing to retain pilots, or they could threaten/action contractual changes to benefit only their side, or they could continue to expect extreme service from their pilots while treating them as easily disposable/replaceable employees, and then they would get nowhere fixing their problem they need to solve. Sound familiar?
The mutually agreeable solution is mostly quite simple in most cases. But, it costs a lot of money to attract and retain top quality pilots, particularly the most valuable ones: the older/longer serving/most experienced/most qualified ones...unless they just don't want to attract and retain those pilots anymore - although that choice also comes with a very high, often (but not always) intangible cost too. Sound familiar?
Military pilots sign away many years of their lives in exchange for pilot training. For most, those many years (much longer than any other officers' contractual commitment in most countries, as far as I know) also comes with the very real risk of not being alive at the end (due to things like the more dangerous flying environment/style (high speed/low level/formation/extreme maneuvering/flying towards each other/etc.), the high performance/risky flying, and the high likelihood of real combat action - which also comes with the risk of imprisonment and/or torture and/or execution, etc.).
Military pilots also sign away their rights to decide where they and their family members will live, when they move, which type of work and flying they will do, which also affects the spouses' ability to work/earn/progress/be happy, kids' childhoods and educations, as well affecting everything else for everyone, from tv to sports to groceries to climate to friendships to - everything.
With most military pilots locked in at a young age to a lengthy, very binding contract, with severe penalties for breaking their contracts (serious imprisonment) and a multitude of additional rules, regulations and laws (military laws) long before they even complete flying/operation training (not knowing if they will fly, or what they will fly - which is much, much more significant to their work/family/futures/lifestyles/survival than whether they are 777/747/A50/etc. pilots - they have not just honored/honoured their side of the agreement, they have done so while graciously serving their countries, at great personal risk and sacrifice by them and their families, even with the "cool stuff" included for some (many get no cool stuff at all, just a raw deal).
How about just having both sides stick to the contract, and if one side needs help from the other side, then they can negotiate/offer an improvement instead of just unilaterally imposing changes that suit them at the moment, just because they think they can get away with it and it is cheaper. Sound familiar?
If the military demonstrates that it will cancel contracts unilaterally and simply impose far-reaching changes that are detrimental to the careers, lifestyles, livelihoods, families, futures and actual lives of its pilots (sound familiar?) then they can expect to have a real hard time getting the best candidates to apply, much less agree to join. This means that the military tradition and desire to select and recruit the best, top notch, top choice and top quality applicants from highly motivated, well educated, intelligent, desirable pools of wannabes with the most potential will still happen, but the new "top" picks will be seriously different in the new, degraded pool of wannabes consisting of a new, much lower overall quality of recruits going forward, forever. Sound familiar?
If the military improves the deal to the point where current pilots want to stay, then the problem will self-correct. For example, how many F-15 pilots would stay (vs. be racing to get their airline seniority number) if the military paid them $1M USD per year to stay after their contractual requirement, and guaranteed them $250K/year in retirement at some point after that? Too much/not enough? Then the market will determine the necessary numbers. The military could also allow its pilots to get hired at airlines, then assist and compensate those airlines (with $$$) and its pilots for resuming military service on short extensions while maintaining their airline seniority (something which already happens in the US to a great extent via the reserves/ANG, but could be better organized/formalized/etc.). Or the military could do nothing to retain pilots, or they could threaten/action contractual changes to benefit only their side, or they could continue to expect extreme service from their pilots while treating them as easily disposable/replaceable employees, and then they would get nowhere fixing their problem they need to solve. Sound familiar?
The mutually agreeable solution is mostly quite simple in most cases. But, it costs a lot of money to attract and retain top quality pilots, particularly the most valuable ones: the older/longer serving/most experienced/most qualified ones...unless they just don't want to attract and retain those pilots anymore - although that choice also comes with a very high, often (but not always) intangible cost too. Sound familiar?
Lots of reservists who thought it would be cool to drive a tank on once a month discovered reality when they ended up in Iraq.
Ask not what your country can do for you...ask what you can do for your country.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: DSOTM
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's all well and good, but do not screw with a contract. A deal is a deal.
Should you want someone to go above and beyond, you can always ask. Should a real war present itself I have no doubt all those retired pilots still fit and able would answer their call of duty. But that's not the case at the moment now, is it?
Should you want someone to go above and beyond, you can always ask. Should a real war present itself I have no doubt all those retired pilots still fit and able would answer their call of duty. But that's not the case at the moment now, is it?
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's all well and good, but do not screw with a contract. A deal is a deal.
Should you want someone to go above and beyond, you can always ask. Should a real war present itself I have no doubt all those retired pilots still fit and able would answer their call of duty. But that's not the case at the moment now, is it?
Should you want someone to go above and beyond, you can always ask. Should a real war present itself I have no doubt all those retired pilots still fit and able would answer their call of duty. But that's not the case at the moment now, is it?
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In addition to Curtain Rod's comment... Having read pages and pages of comments from guys leaving the military... Most of the reasons have little to do with money.
Most have quoted bad leadership with no loyalty from their bosses, just ****ty managers looking for their next promotion. Poor career management. Decreasing conditions with poor work life balance. And finally the organization itself is poorly managed by numpties who waste money on stupidity whilst telling you to be more efficient. All Sound familiar?
To quote one of the comments I read... "You've taken the best job in the world and made it suck." Sound familiar?
Most have quoted bad leadership with no loyalty from their bosses, just ****ty managers looking for their next promotion. Poor career management. Decreasing conditions with poor work life balance. And finally the organization itself is poorly managed by numpties who waste money on stupidity whilst telling you to be more efficient. All Sound familiar?
To quote one of the comments I read... "You've taken the best job in the world and made it suck." Sound familiar?
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In addition to Curtain Rod's comment... Having read pages and pages of comments from guys leaving the military... Most of the reasons have little to do with money.
Most have quoted bad leadership with no loyalty from their bosses, just ****ty managers looking for their next promotion. Poor career management. Decreasing conditions with poor work life balance. And finally the organization itself is poorly managed by numpties who waste money on stupidity whilst telling you to be more efficient. All Sound familiar?
To quote one of the comments I read... "You've taken the best job in the world and made it suck." Sound familiar?
Most have quoted bad leadership with no loyalty from their bosses, just ****ty managers looking for their next promotion. Poor career management. Decreasing conditions with poor work life balance. And finally the organization itself is poorly managed by numpties who waste money on stupidity whilst telling you to be more efficient. All Sound familiar?
To quote one of the comments I read... "You've taken the best job in the world and made it suck." Sound familiar?
That being said, I am available to fly the really cool airplanes in the US military on a part time basis. C-5, B-52, C-17 and some carrier landings for the navy are some of my preferences. Please don't call me for the boring stuff like a Metro.
