Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

HKG 25R/07L high speed exits

Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

HKG 25R/07L high speed exits

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Jun 2014, 22:34
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Here, there, and everywhere
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by White None
WRONG - 777
Why wouldn't he just roll to the next exit instead of what I assume was an attempt to make the high speed.

Did he discover that after using heavy braking in an attempt to make the high speed was just a bit too far and tried a sharp turn to get to it and discovered that he was facing the runway edge?
punkalouver is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2014, 00:09
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I was under the impression that it occurred at the end of the runway involving a mis-judged 180 requiring a three point turn

Something in the limitations saying not to back the Aircraft using reverse?

Worked for him...
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2014, 02:39
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Here
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
but doesn't each AB setting give a constant deceleration independent of reverse selection (reverse, in 'normal' ops will just affect the brake temperature?).
The TOTAL rate of deceleration provided by the autobrake includes reverse selection. If you select full reverse, the autobrake works less hard to provide the required rate, hence the lower brake temps.
crwkunt roll is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2014, 03:11
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nitpicker330
I was under the impression that it occurred at the end of the runway involving a mis-judged 180 requiring a three point turn

Something in the limitations saying not to back the Aircraft using reverse?

Worked for him...
Looks like every runway end has available a simple 90 degree turnoff if you are at the end and no taxiways are closed or blocked.

Some aircraft are allowed idle reverse while taxiing. The limitation is no more than idle reverse. Perhaps he was light and just used that. Or does it specifically say no reverse movement of aircraft with engines at idle. Of course, backwards movement at idle is occurs during pushback all the time. Of course the engine is in forward thrust.

Last edited by JammedStab; 19th Jun 2014 at 01:28.
JammedStab is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2014, 04:42
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Smogsville
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Backing the airplane with use of reverse thrust is prohibited.
.....................


The following errors occurred with your submission:
The message you have entered is too short. Please lengthen your message to at least 10 characters.
SMOC is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2014, 00:53
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jammed stab. The engines are not selected into reverse when experiencing reverse movement during push back!

Not only is backing the aircraft using reverse thrust prohibited, it's also a very bad idea. Firstly, the increased FOD hazard is significant with all the crap being blown up into the intake and secondly, can you imagine the world of trouble you'd be in if you were backing up a bit fast and decided to use the brakes to slow it down? There are many other reasons but these two are enough for me.
Loopdeloop is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2014, 01:28
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What airport did this happen at?
geh065 is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2014, 01:33
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Here, there, and everywhere
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Loopdeloop
Not only is backing the aircraft using reverse thrust prohibited, it's also a very bad idea. Firstly, the increased FOD hazard is significant with all the crap being blown up into the intake and secondly, can you imagine the world of trouble you'd be in if you were backing up a bit fast and decided to use the brakes to slow it down? There are many other reasons but these two are enough for me.
I remember way back when in the '90s going through Atlanta which had Eastern Airlines as a major carrier at the time. Except for the A300, they did powerbacks from the gate with all their aircraft which surprisingly included the 757.

Looking at the HKG airport diagram, it does appear that there is a simple 90 degree turn off at the end of each runway.
punkalouver is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2014, 03:22
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Before someone provides a link to the mighty C130 or C17 backing up in dusty Afghanistan, I should add that my use of the expression "the aircraft" was used to denote the particular aircraft involved in the incident under discussion in this thread!
Loopdeloop is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2014, 15:24
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eastern ceased ops in Jan 1990, Real Eastern March 1989. Powerbacks were approved for B727, DC9, and B757. A300 and L1011 were always pushed back.
Obama57 is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2017, 02:47
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So there ya go...it can be done as seen here. And apparently the CX one happened at YYZ.

http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/5...urn-757-a.html
JammedStab is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2017, 06:42
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Where You Aren't
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What's more concerning is full reverse on a non-contaminated runway when brake temperatures are not an issue. Oh, and after an ACARS landing data assessment...

At the home base...

With one million feet of runway...

Idiots do this because they have no fuc*ing clue...

Moronic robots.
Oval3Holer is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2017, 06:49
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Where You Aren't
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's American doing it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Zkxh903s_w
Oval3Holer is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2017, 01:29
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: hongkong
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Really?? Grow a pair will ya
BlunderBus is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.