Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

B748i or A380 order?

Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

B748i or A380 order?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Jun 2013, 09:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B748i or A380 order?

Already day 3 at Le Bourget air show and still no order for CX.

What's the latest rumour?
fly123456 is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2013, 10:04
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Here
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Neither. Both have 4 engines. CX don't want 4 engines. 787-1000 and 777-900/100 by 2016. There's a rumour.
crwkunt roll is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2013, 12:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 1313 Mockingbird Lane
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Neither. Both have 4 engines. CX don't want 4 engines.
Hmmm. Think again. Think slot constrained airport beyond about 2017 and no third runway til 2023.
Like the last days of Kai Tak. Average seats per movement rose to 214.
Lots of 73s and 320s running around at the moment. Watch the big boys return as flights consolidate.ear
Average Number of Passengers
per Passenger Flight Movement
1993 209
1994 204
1995 210
1996 214
1997 198
1998 194 (New airport opened on 6
th July, 1998)
1999 203
2000 208
2001 189
2002 191
2003 174
2004 185
2005 186
2006 191
2007 196
2008 194
2009 196

Source: CAD (1993-1996), AAHK (1997-2009
LapSap is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2013, 12:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Smogsville
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cathay Pacific still is considering an order for either the Airbus A380 or the Boeing 747-8, but no decision is imminent, the airline’s CEO John Slosar tells Aviation Week.

Cathay for several months has been saying that it was weighing whether to order one of the competing large widebody passenger aircraft, and Slosar previously indicated that a decision could be made in the first half of this year. However, the decision “is going to drag on longer than that,” Slosar said at a Oneworld alliance event during the International Air Transport Association’s annual general meeting in Cape Town.

“We’ve done some work, but we’re not at the point that would lead to a decision,” says Slosar. He notes that the carrier is keeping in touch with what the manufacturers are doing with these programs, and “if the right opportunity came along we would take a look.”

One thing Cathay is considering is how the large widebodies would fit in its network. “We could easily deploy them, we have the routes,” Slosar says. However, the tricky part would be integrating them with the rest of the schedule. “We’re not delaying, we’re just getting to it and working it through,” he says.

Slosar notes that Cathay already has a large number of widebodies on order, such as Airbus A330s and A350s, as well as Boeing 777s, so the carrier is “not in a huge rush to do anything else at the moment.”

Regarding the proposed Boeing 777X range, Slosar says it is an aircraft that Cathay will look at closely. The carrier is one of the world’s largest operators of 777-300ERs, “and we like the type,” he says.
Cathay Still Contemplating Fleet Decision

Don't expect any orders at Paris.
SMOC is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2013, 13:20
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wherever I lay my hat.
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Other airlines are already well along the way operating them, but CX is STILL looking into it.....
Way to miss the boat, CX.
Kasompe is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2013, 14:20
  #6 (permalink)  
sos
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 1/2 Here & There
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
747-8i & the way we do business !

“We’re not delaying, we’re just getting to it and working it through,” he says!

This a quote from the Aviation week as per SMOC .

Sounds like the way CX does business with all including its employes !

Bases
SHP
Housing
Etc etc

sos is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2013, 01:35
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Here
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Way to miss the boat, CX.
If it's not a money maker, then CX is not interested. So, they haven't missed a boat.
crwkunt roll is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2013, 09:42
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wherever I lay my hat.
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crw....
Everyone else is making money with them and ordering more.
Everyone else is moving into new markets and opening up a broader revenue base, ie Africa and South America, etc.
Cathay has been missing boats for years, and makes money in spite of itself, not because of any particularly gifted management style or ability.
Kasompe is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 05:06
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Actually no, the A380 isn't liked by Airline accountants.

Only the PR department and some Pax like it.
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 05:13
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Krug departure, Merlot transition
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And, er... EK seems to not mind them.
main_dog is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 06:11
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Polar Route
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And since CX's business model is so similar to EK's, CX should have them too.

Right?
cxorcist is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 07:30
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Here
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The airline accountants are prone to telling the odd person or two what they think of the 380. I'm sure the accountants run EK just as much as they do in CX so they're ordering the 380 because it makes financial sense.

Last edited by Threethirty; 22nd Jun 2013 at 07:33.
Threethirty is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 10:36
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Not in a Bus
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Haven't we been thru this before? Examine the No. of ERAs on most of EKs routes then consider our Pacific routings, PASY, PHNL, Russia etc. it's been done on a past thread if anyone's bothered.
White None is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 11:41
  #14 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,175
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
If it is not possible, how is China Southern flying Guangzhou and Los Angeles now ? how is BA going to fly London Hong Kong ?

Could it just be the previous posters had an axe to grind ?
swh is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 15:22
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
look..Nitpicker330 knows stuff all about how accountants think or post between themselves, unless of course he's a bean counter himself in some diabolicle corner of a legacy or pseudo legacy airline. Bottom line here..the 380 is working people and CX have missed their boat. The pro line is blocked for orders until 2017 FGS...and that 747/8 thing can't even cut it. Cx is doomed to reduce its brief into higher frequency, lower volume markets and sadly can't even exploit the latter. Where is it with the African market??..like nowhere!! The sandpit yields are minimal but they stay in the circus through route politics. Niche markets have never been forte but even then, Madrid, Munich, Zurich..again and Manchester should have been mainstream by now. Its a sham and the Skytrash figures, as much as they are propped up by incentives etc..are setting the trend..ie..down.
Pucka is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 20:07
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CX's business model at the moment focuses on premium traffic, first and business class. Not sure if the A380 or B747-8i will fit the model. There is only so many first and business class seats you can fill per flight. Y class yield is very small, so why go that way ???
GTC58 is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 21:53
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1998
Location: Between a rock
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel 748

It mighten happen overnight, but it will happen.

Last edited by jetset; 22nd Jun 2013 at 21:54.
jetset is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 21:57
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Here
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why go that way? Because you'll lose Business and First passengers to other carriers if you don't, making the Cathay is only a premium airline mantra rather a moot point!
Threethirty is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 23:18
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: overthere
Posts: 3,040
Received 26 Likes on 10 Posts
How many premium do you carry per flight, We carry 14 first and 76 business per flight (380) at EK.

The don
donpizmeov is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2013, 04:17
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Exactly my point, you carry only 30 odd more premium pax in your big 380 that weighs around 200 tonnes MORE than our 777 and you think it makes better business sense. Not only that we carry lots of cargo at the same time AND burn a LOT less fuel.


That's why CX's accountants DON'T WANT IT.

The PR people on the other hand.......maybe we will be forced into buying it just because everyone else has?

Last edited by nitpicker330; 23rd Jun 2013 at 04:22.
nitpicker330 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.