Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

Pilots : Regarding VHHH J9 & J1 TO

Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

Pilots : Regarding VHHH J9 & J1 TO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Sep 2009, 03:35
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Northern Half
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pilots : Regarding VHHH J9 & J1 TO

Should Ground Control clear you to J9 (25L) or J1 (07R) for departure and should you really want the extra 99m that J10 or H1 affords, I request that you make said call to Ground and not to Tower as this decision falls within Ground's jurisdiction. I'm sorry to burden flight crew with this but maybe you will be able to get through to those who don't seem to understand the difference.

Any counter-argument supporting taxi to J9 or J1 is academic as flight crew who see the full length available will invariably ask for it and further, should Ground Control specifically require J9 or J1, then Ground can explain their reasons directly.
MercuryRising is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2009, 04:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think that you are making to big of a deal out of it. I personally don't have a problem with ground control clearing me to J1 or J9, as long as it facilitates a more expeditious departure for either my aircraft or someone else. The aim of the game is to get everyone off the ground and into the air ASAP.

What the big deal if when you are approaching the Holding point and traffic is not a problem, the tower controller clearing you to a different Holding point. Happens is a lot of major airports around the world.
Night Watch is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2009, 05:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
yeah really, having a slow day in the Tower?

If I'm on the GND Freq and I see that the full length is not blocked and might be available I WILL ask.

If I'm on the TWR Freq and I see the full length is not blocked and might be available I WILL ask.

Either way as I'm responsible for the safe operation of my Aircraft I will do/say as I see fit to accomplish said operation.

So, live with it.

Besides, you can ( and do ) say no.

What really annoys me is when you are sitting at the holding point waiting and ground insist you stay on his freq. In bad or marginal weather I should be listening to whats going on the TWR freq for such things as Wind checks, Windshear reports, Wx reports from departed aircraft etc etc. I can't hear any of that if I'm hearing CX 123 requesting pushback from bay E1.

Common Airmanship I would have thought.

And don't tell me I should listen on VHF2, this isn't Dhaka airspace!!
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2009, 05:45
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats the attitude nitpicker....and you wonder why pilots are so popular.
geh065 is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2009, 05:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Didn't know we were un-popular as a group?

They are Air Traffic SERVICES aren't they?

They are here to provide the end user ( us ) with a service.

If I see the need to ask for something then they should try and accomodate me within reason. Anytime and anywhere, that's their job.

So what if I ask on the TWR, if it's not available just say NO.

A waste of a thread if you ask me.
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2009, 11:13
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
should you really want the extra 99m that J10 or H1 affords
Have to agree! We are never field length limited and compute our data based on take-off from J1/J9, so why makes things more complicated by requesting J10/H1. If you think an additional 99m is going to make the operation safer you shouldn't really be flying.
Dragon69 is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2009, 11:56
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bob Tandy's place boozing with Darryl Hill
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dragon69, Respectfully,

From ACARS-
PACKS ON
A343 31deg C, 276.5t, 5 KT tail, TOGA, 07R J1 = CANNOT
A343 31deg C, 276.5t, 5 KT tail, TOGA, 07R H1 = CAN

99 meters in this case makes a BIG difference!

AFL
ALPHA FLOOR is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2009, 12:11
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: asia
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good point AFL, I think my learned colleague should have said " in 90% of cases, " I think he forgot about the 2nd most gutless 4 engine jet in the world ( the 146 being the 1st, of course ).

On the other hand, when you ask old mate if he wants the figures for J1/J9 in an A320, and he says " we will not be accepting J1/J9 !! " in a stern voice, well, private pilot comes to mind
hongkongfooey is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2009, 12:44
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,410
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With 777's not having bodygear steering it always seemed sensible to me to calculate performance from J9 and turn gently on from J10 so as not to scrub the tires
BusyB is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2009, 12:49
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what about calling CX or Dragon and the rest of the major HK companies and explaining how it works, and they can inform the crew. from my experience very few know that ground controls the J9/10 thing etc as apposed to the tower. If you understand it you can deal with it if you dont then your forever confused nobody's fault live and learn!
notanotherfivehourstogo is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2009, 13:20
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: HKG
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the info MercuryRising. Clarification on these matters are always appreciated.
moonbug is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2009, 13:24
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: East Coast Aus
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunately, seems there are one or two obnoxious & arrogant tw.ts in the tower. While ago some prima donna cleared us (B747-4) for takeoff on 25L as a VERY heavy B747-4 started his rotate at the other end. I asked for a 1 minute delay, because, besides the obvious, it was a training flight (abinitio handling R/H), & was abruptly informed, that there was "NO SUCH THING" (his words, believe it or not), & that our in trail distance was sufficient. As we were light, elected to roll about 30 sec later anyway. Sent his supervisor an e-mail, with a detailed explanation about wing tip vortices, induced drag etc for his info. Nice reply received- from supervisor!!!!
Tembani is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2009, 14:43
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
777...no body gear steering?!!!
The Wraith is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2009, 15:30
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,410
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ghostie,
No just a trailing pair of wheels
BusyB is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2009, 15:52
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Northern Half
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the opinions and comments.

NA5HTG, I have in the past tried the official route but it was probably to trivial to take further.

D69 your point echoes the official line I have had come back at me but regardless, its human nature that you'll get crew who see the full length available and will want it. There's nothing wrong with both of these viewpoints and all I'm asking is : if flight crew want the full length then please ask Ground as they have jurisdiction ( and I appreciate that asking Ground is not always possible if you've been switched to Tower ).

I know this is not rocket science but Ground should clear traffic to J1 or J9 for one of three reasons, i) they specifically want you to go there or ii) they're a Ground god, take-off data is computed for J1 and J9 and everyone else is an idiot or iii) they've never given it a second thought. By soliciting your comments I'm trying to address the latter.
MercuryRising is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2009, 16:13
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Here and There
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jeez...A whole thread for a simple question..Or so would one think !? I know, it's the "cathay way" to discuss things ad nauseam. Well here is my share of ..."it"...

I believe that simplicity is the ultimate sophistication and therefore I try to keep things as simple as possible (but not simpler).

It is just a matter of communication. ATC has no idea what our weight or performance on a given day is. Sure there are those controllers, that have been around for a while and understand the difference of a B744 going to TPE vs going to SFO. Unfortunately, ATC faces the same problem as the rest of aviation....the declining conditions fail to attract talent.

As talent is gradually replaced by some type of robotic buerocracy, we will face more and more issues of this nature.

So if I need the whole length of any runway, I just advise the ground upon taxy request or otherwise as soon as possible.

That way they can squeeze us in a sequence and by the time we get to the RWY there are no or minimal delays..

Worked so far.....

Last edited by Avius; 7th Sep 2009 at 16:30.
Avius is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2009, 03:21
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"ATC faces the same problem as the rest of aviation....the declining conditions fail to attract talent."

Our beloved Brother 4 would strongly disagree with you in-sight. He has personally hand pick the most talented student controllers. All the pilots' grievances on HK ATC will be fully addressed in the coming years.
By-stander is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2009, 04:33
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
BusyB..........1/ The 777 doesn't have "body gear" and 2/ the back wheel pairs on the 777 are steerable, so no problems in tight turns. That is not an excuse.

There's an old saying in Aviation...

3 things that are useless to a Pilot:

1/ The fuel in the tank back at the airport
2/ The sky above you
3/ The runway behind you.

If you have the practical opportunity to make use of all the runway HKIA built then why not?
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2009, 05:52
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Aluminum tube
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Dragon 69, you may not be field length limited in your Navajo, but some of us on large airplanes at max weight on very hot days may need all the runway.
Svengali is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2009, 06:39
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Personally, in spite of type, wake turb category, hair driers for engines, colour on the tail etc, how many wheels can steer, H1, J10 is 99 mts less swimming to do should your magic machine decide to go surfing off the end of the runway .

MR, thanks for letting us know who has the controlling function, I was of the mistaken belief it was Tower.
OldChinaHand is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.