Wikiposts
Search
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Gen Navigation feedback question?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Aug 2001, 00:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Gen Navigation feedback question?

Has anyone seen this question in their feedback literature and more importantly know how to do it?

An INS/IRS has an azimuth gyro drift of 0.01 deg/hour. After a 12 hour flight at 500 kts groundspeed, what is the accumulated position error due to the drift rate?

a)60nm
b)6nm
c)12nm
d)2nm

The answer in the feedback is given as b)6nm
but having discussed this with someone else we feel that to do the question you need to be given the lat which we don't have!

Any bright ideas much appreciated!

Thanks.
Crosswind Limits is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2001, 01:12
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Bournemouth, UK
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

I think this is right, but I hope someone else will confirm this.

OK, you need the average drift, which is 0.06 degree/hour. And we travel 6000 nm in 12 at 500kts. Then it's the 1:60 rule. Dist=Angle x Range over 60 (sorry, it's hard to type out a formula).

So we have Dist off = 0.06 x 6000nm over 60.

Which gives 6nm.

I hope this helps (if it's right! )

[ 15 August 2001: Message edited by: Scratch One Bandit ]
Scratch One Bandit is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2001, 00:30
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: bournemouth
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Crosswind Limits,

A good question, but I doubt a JAR one. Azimuth gyro drift rate will give rise to track error computation (unbounded) and groundspeed computation (dependant upon Schuler loop). If taken at simplistic face value I feel that the answer offered by Scratch One Bandit is incorrect. ).01 deg/hour times 12 hours = 0.12 degrees. The rest of SOB computation is correct, but the answer will be 12nm. I do not know where the question and feedback answer came from, but I do know that much which is purported and reported to be exam feedback is often untrue. I have spent the last ten years sifting fact from rumour.

Aye,

David Webb ex (Friday 10th) PPSC
David Webb is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2001, 01:04
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Northampton, UK
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

DW,

The question is actually pretty much verbatim a genuine JAR question... I had it 6 months ago, and had previously seen it in the feedback.

SOB's answer is correct. The easiest way to understand what's going on is to draw it out in little triangles (which I can't do on this screen!!)

After the first hour, the gyro has drifted 0.01 degrees, giving a track error of (500 / 60 * 0.01)(using the 1 in 60 rule), or 5/60nm.

By the end of the second hour, the drift has increased to 0.02 degrees, i.e. a FURTHER track error of (2 * 5/60)nm, in addition to the 5/60 already incurred. So the cumulative track error is now (1+2) * 5/60.

Similarly over the remaining 10 hours. The final cumulative track error is (1+2+3+...+11+12) * 5/60, or about 6nm.

A truly ridiculous question. Learn the answer, rather than the method, and it'll be an easy mark!!
Cobbler is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2001, 18:45
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Earth
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Cobbler is right, it is a JAA question.

Both methods - SOB's & Cobbler's - will give you the right answer.

The mathematical basis for this is based on Integration or Calculus . The simple way to think of it, is as a mean error, therefore if you apply the error at the half way point, 0.06 degrees, you will always get the right answer even if they change the numbers!

Good luck!
Spartacus73 is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2001, 22:52
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Bournemouth, UK
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

Hurrah! I was right!

And stop calling me SOB, you gits!
Scratch One Bandit is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2001, 00:26
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Cheers SOB and others!
Crosswind Limits is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2001, 01:12
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I can confirm that this is indeed a genuine JAR Gen Nav exam question as we have had several students at Oxford report it and their recollections tallied consistently. It first came up about 6 months ago. Scratch One Bandit and Cobbler do have good rough sensible solutions and Spartacus 73 has correctly realised that it a calculus problem (which, in my view, is outside the Learning Objectives). I don't believe that David Webb's assessment is right, although I would like to know which answer the JAA mark as correct. Because the equations can't really be laid out on a ASCII-based thread such as this, the answer is attached on the URL below or type in www.v1rotate.freeuk.com.

As I say in my answer, this is a question that has absolutely no relevance whatsoever to becoming a practical airline pilot. However, if you're thinking of a job as a systems engineer at Litton or Honeywell......

Paul Hickley
General Nav Subject Specialist
Oxford Aviation Training
www.virotate.freeuk.com

[ 24 August 2001: Message edited by: Paul Hickley, Gen Nav Spec, Oxford ]
Paul Hickley is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2001, 02:25
  #9 (permalink)  

Jet Blast Rat
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sarfend-on-Sea
Age: 51
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Agree, Paul, both with your answer to the question of course but more importantly your assesment that it is not only outside the learning objectives but also completely irrelevant to a pilot!

SC
Nav General, SFT
Send Clowns is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2001, 02:01
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

For those of you who tried to phone me at work about this question, it's probably easier to e-mail me at work on [email protected]

Or, of course, you could post a reply here.

Paul Hickley
Paul Hickley is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2001, 04:36
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Area under the graph will always work!!!

MJ
mad_jock is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.