Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Sea King too old and putting Lives at risk.

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Sea King too old and putting Lives at risk.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th November 2007 | 08:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Newcastle
Sea King too old and putting Lives at risk.

cats out of the bag

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/humber/7082053.stm

Just suprised it's taken so long to come out.
Justintime80 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th November 2007 | 08:26
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 57
From: UK
Well, it's a good thing then that they are all going to be replaced by S-92s, eh?
Bravo73 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th November 2007 | 08:28
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Queen of The Moorlands
lets all hold our breath for that one.. on the count of 3,

1,2.......3!
Alloa Akbar is offline  
Reply
Old 7th November 2007 | 10:08
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale Rest Home for the Elderly
Ancient Aircraft

Check out the thread in Mil Aircrew, SAR Privatisation.
leopold bloom is offline  
Reply
Old 7th November 2007 | 12:33
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: Aberdoom
Just did............Some people getting their knickers in a twist. We all know SAR H is happening and the S92/AW139 are upto date excellent a/c. So whats the problem?
chcoffshore is offline  
Reply
Old 7th November 2007 | 13:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 313
Likes: 2
From: PLANET ZOG
"S92/AW139 are up to date and excellent aircraft"
Just what do you base that statement on?? The publicity brochure or your companies spin on the new contract?
One type is only just into SAR, last month and not yet proven, and the other one is still just a dream!
I would love to see both types become first class replacements for the type/s they are due to replace, and that will take some doing, but to say they are excellent is jumping the gun somewhat!
3D CAM is offline  
Reply
Old 7th November 2007 | 13:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: Aberdoom
Really? Been in a S61 lately. But like i said they are both excellent a/c. Have a look at their world wide useage not just the UK.
chcoffshore is offline  
Reply
Old 7th November 2007 | 13:19
  #8 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 567
Likes: 4
From: Hereford UK
How long before ...................................?
MOSTAFA is offline  
Reply
Old 7th November 2007 | 13:55
  #9 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 794
Likes: 8
From: Wiltshire
............Crab comes along?
oldbeefer is offline  
Reply
Old 7th November 2007 | 13:58
  #10 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 57
From: UK
Originally Posted by chcoffshore
Have a look at their world wide useage not just the UK.
They are. And as it stands, neither aircraft is a proven SAR platform.

Just because they are new and shiny doesn't mean to say that they are currently 'fit for purpose'. Only time will tell.
Bravo73 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th November 2007 | 14:12
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: Aberdoom
Ok point taken............Lets wait and see!
chcoffshore is offline  
Reply
Old 7th November 2007 | 14:28
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 313
Likes: 2
From: PLANET ZOG
"Been in an S61 lately"
Well, actually, yes!! More than one come to that. Have you?? An SAR one that is!
3D CAM is offline  
Reply
Old 7th November 2007 | 14:29
  #13 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 73
From: England
I doubt that the age of the aircraft is the issue.

Spares parts availability and maintenance are the areas of concern.

Current hours for S61s, some over 40,000, for Super Pumas approaching 30,000+.

Well maintained helicopters go on for ever.
ericferret is offline  
Reply
Old 7th November 2007 | 14:40
  #14 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 567
Likes: 4
From: Hereford UK
Should change your name to "Old Spoilsport"
MOSTAFA is offline  
Reply
Old 12th November 2007 | 03:41
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Phuket
I fly a S61 with Carson Blades and typed (CAA/FAA) in the aircraft. Any questions?
before landing check list is offline  
Reply
Old 12th November 2007 | 05:49
  #16 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
Oh ...........did someone say something about SAR aircraft......I'd hate to disappoint by not showing up on the thread
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Reply
Old 12th November 2007 | 08:37
  #17 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 567
Likes: 4
From: Hereford UK
Cracking Jon
MOSTAFA is offline  
Reply
Old 12th November 2007 | 09:48
  #18 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 794
Likes: 8
From: Wiltshire
Took longer than I expected!
oldbeefer is offline  
Reply
Old 12th November 2007 | 10:03
  #19 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 567
Likes: 4
From: Hereford UK
Ditto!!!!!
MOSTAFA is offline  
Reply
Old 12th November 2007 | 14:44
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: swansea, wales
Thats kind of the same view I have about the sea king, also were not the seakings a few years back replaced with mark 8's? I am sure the ones at Chivenor were, and if that is the case they would still be very young airframes in terms of hours etc? Correct me if I am wrong.
bolkow is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.