Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

Australia fines GF

Wikiposts
Search
Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

Australia fines GF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Sep 2007, 19:15
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Australia fines GF

This just out on the Sydney Morning Herald web-page...

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/...783236822.html

Send the bill to Jimbo in AUH!
gulfboy is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2007, 20:14
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Havana
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gulf Air late...nooo, don't believe a word of it
Che Guevara is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2007, 06:00
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have, in the past, had to spend a night in Melbourne because the poor little dears in Sydney were all safely tucked up in bed. This caused me to miss seeing a mate who I hadn't seen for years and have still not been able to rearrange.

I think that all major airlines should stop flying to Sydney untill it get's itself sorted out
Time to tell the wimps to put up with it or install double glazing. Sydney needs to be able to offer landing and takeoff all night if it wants to be part of the modern world.

On On
sirwa69 is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2007, 06:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: At a Bordello
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Poor Diddums,

Missed out on seeing a mate so ........ let's get the world to stop flying to Sydney.

Lord Flashhart is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2007, 07:16
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Juffair
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So do you intend to write to the operators of LHR and tell them to get into the real world? Everybody else manages to make the curfew in Sydney. I think the problems were of GFs making.
Bombay HF is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2007, 07:45
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was not defending Gulf Air. Their problem, their lookout!

I was making a point that airports are major capital investments as well as being extremely important to the economy of their cities/countries and therefore should not be hindered from working 24 hours a day.

After all we try to run the aircraft 24 hours a day.

Most of the worlds major airports, Sydney included, were built in sparsley populated parts of their city and the sprawl came to meet them.
People who bought or built houses near these airports got them cheap as there is a nuisance factor. They had a choice and made it, why do we now allow them to dictate to us the aviation professionals and travellers when we can travel.

It's time to grab back the power from the soft, southern, shandy drinking, tree hugging, bearded, folk singing, unwashed, green tossers

On On

Oh and before someone yelps "I bet you don't live next to an airport" I do
I live approx 3 km from an airport that does operate all night, dosen't bother me in the least.
sirwa69 is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2007, 08:14
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Magic Kingdom
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The second part of this article just sounds sureal. I had to look at the date to make sure it wasn't writen on April 1

The penalty was for two breaches of the prohibition on taking off or landing between 11pm and 6am.
Both incidents took place in 2005, the first at 11.14pm on July 30, and the next at 11.28pm on August 20.

The departure of both aircraft had been delayed because of mechanical repairs.
"There is a need for adequate punishment that reflects the seriousness of the breach, particularly the second offence of flying over the highly populated areas at 11.25pm and later. This is an offence where there are real and genuine victims - those persons who expect to have eventual peace from aircraft noise," Mr Heilpern said.
I could just imagine. "Sorry folks, but I have some good news and some bad news. Our small problem has been fixed but as it's slightly after 11PM we have been given a takeoff slot of 6AM"

Give me a break.
Desert Diner is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2007, 08:14
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Canada
Age: 53
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The fine is around $175,000 for two cases. They are claiming that by charging the airline they are protecting the poor people around the airport. Now it would be fair enough if they devided the $175,000 among those houses that were affected.
BusTie is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2007, 09:32
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: East of the sun & west of the moon
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually, I cannot for the love of God think of any GF-plane, that wouldn't have qualified to have been late into Sydney, since they are ALL in dire need of major mechanical repairs before departure
Spirit is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2007, 03:45
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: The Pilot Grinder
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
69,

Mascot sparsly populated.............. you ever looked at a map of Syd and where KSA is?

Maybe when Captain Cook sailed HMS Endeavour it was.

Airports all around the world have curfews for a lot of reasons, some good some bad, but never the less they are there and Airlines know about them and adhere to the restriction. (most)

Got fined..... tough, not the first, not the last.
CAYNINE is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2007, 04:45
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Put 100fils in the phone and call someone who gives a ****
ironbutt57 is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2007, 05:23
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: in the kitchen
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the crew did not realise it needed to post a "push back" request with Sydney Air Traffic Control
Nor had they asked for taxi clearance,


mad
maddog62 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2007, 05:42
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Juffair
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't get your point IB
Bombay HF is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2007, 00:40
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Airport lounge
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems like judge heard about the new package too and decided to get a peice for his CAA.
NO FD NO SRS is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.