Wikiposts
Search
Flight Testing A forum for test pilots, flight test engineers, observers, telemetry and instrumentation engineers and anybody else involved in the demanding and complex business of testing aeroplanes, helicopters and equipment.

Aquaplaning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Aug 2006, 09:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aquaplaning

The formula I used for many years to calculate aquaplaning speed on a contaminated runway was one I got from an old flight safety film that showed US aircraft landing under various adverse circumstances.

The research concluded aquaplaning would start above the speed given by:

8.6 x sqrt tyre pressure in psi

So 2 questions:

1. Is there a better, proven modern calculating method?
2. Does it apply to any tyre (for e.g. a car) or is it restricted to ac tyres through some limitation such as tread pattern?
GlosMikeP is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2006, 11:13
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Extract from PROCEEDINGS of the 2nd International Meeting on Aircraft Performance on Contaminated Runways. 1999
Caution large file – 11mb.
“Based on the results, Mr. van Es concluded that modern aircraft tires have lower hydroplaning speeds than those predicted by the well-known and commonly accepted equation developed by Mr. Horne of NASA. He stated that this was because of the differences in the footprint dimensions of the newer tires as compared to the older bias-ply tires.”
The diagram in the presentation indicates that the hydroplaning boundary ranges from 9*SQR tire pressure to 6*SQR tire pressure.
safetypee is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2006, 12:31
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for that, I'll have a read. It always puzzled me how there could be just one equation for all cases. I never quite believed it.
GlosMikeP is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2006, 12:52
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Interestingly, EASA stay with the old equation, but there are many other considerations involved in landing. Operation on Contaminated Runways.

The Canadians have done a lot of work in this area –
Overview of the Joint Winter Runway Friction Measurement Program, November 2004 (TP 13361)

Most of the references are available via Transport Canada web site.

And one more equation
Vacq(kt) = SQR(tire press / sg of contaminant)
Ref Getting to Grips with Performance see page 82; an Airbus document (8mb)

Last edited by safetypee; 20th Aug 2006 at 15:19.
safetypee is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.