Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Flight Testing
Reload this Page >

Water / methanol injection

Flight Testing A forum for test pilots, flight test engineers, observers, telemetry and instrumentation engineers and anybody else involved in the demanding and complex business of testing aeroplanes, helicopters and equipment.

Water / methanol injection

Old 30th Jan 2006, 11:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: purple academy
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Water / methanol injection

I am hoping that John Farley will see this and respond.
I have been reading about water/meth injection in piston engines and I wonder whether it might be useful for very small gas turbines. Does anybody have experience or knowledge of this in aircraft engines.
Some of the claims and descriptions are puzzling me. Since methanol has a lower calorific value (LCV) than petrol, I cannot see how it could boost power. The water, however, would reduce air temperature, making it 'easier' to compress. On the other hand, if they are referring to nitromethane, this would have the effect of enriching the oxygen content.
So the question is, what is the chemical content of water / method used for gas turbines?
Jack Aubrey is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2006, 12:22
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: South Central UK
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jack,

Cannot answer your chemistry queries but RAF Andovers had a Water/Meth system to boost engine performance. There was an obvious 'kick' when the system engaged as the RPM wound up.

lm
lightningmate is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2006, 12:34
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: purple academy
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks lm. I didn't know that - was that for the Air Dominance variant of the Handover?
Jack Aubrey is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2006, 13:33
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
The HS748 and BAC 1-11 used Water Meth.
As I understand, the principle is for the water to lower the air temperature and the meth to stop it from freezing.
I couldn’t resist this - the investigation concluded that it was not water meth in the tank.
safetypee is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2006, 15:27
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
safetypee's very close -

Water provides evaporative cooling, but also more mass flow. The methanol is only for antifreeze.
barit1 is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2006, 15:53
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: South Central UK
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jack,

I am unfamiliar with your ref to the 'Air Dominance' version. The Military variant with the rear ramp and clamshell doors was fitted with a Water/Meth system. From safetypee's input, it would seem logical that The Queen's Flight HS748s were similarly fitted.

lm
lightningmate is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2006, 19:46
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doesn't the Harrier use water injection for extra power in the hover?

SSD
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2006, 21:19
  #8 (permalink)  

Do a Hover - it avoids G
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 90
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The various Pegasus engines in UK Harrier variants up until those in the GR7A and GR9A had a JPT limit which when you hit it resulted in an auto reduction of fuel flow and so a cutback in RPM unless you tripped the limiters. So a 50 imp gall tank of plain water (demin ideally to avoid furring up of the injectors) was used. When this was switched on you were in effect pissing on the fire and so reducing hot end metal temps. This gave a lot more thrust – 1000 lb or more depending on the conditions.

When off doing shows etc unsupported one used to fill up the water tank from the local fire engine. The filler cap was on the top of the fuse above the wing and like a car. If asked "Wot you filling it up with water for mister?" the best answer was to look around as if to check for the black Omegas and say quietly. "Its the special fuel pellet I put in first that makes it work"

We needed no antifreeze 'cos the tank was in the engine bay which stayed warm even in a high alt cruise.
John Farley is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 07:17
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: purple academy
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Water injection

Many thanks John.
Jack Aubrey is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 09:06
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't KC-135s and B-52s with turbojets rather than turbofans use it as well? Otherwise even the earth's curvature wouldn't have got those beasts airborne.
Zoom is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 09:45
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: purple academy
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks chaps.

Thanks to all for contributions. The application I am looking at is very small gas turbines for model aeroplanes and UAVs. In models they are very heavy on fuel consumption and I suspect that there are considerable amounts of unburnt hydrocarbons being cast to the wind. The scale issue arises big time with residence time in the combustors being very short indeed. I was wondering whether spraying water and methanol (commonly used for model IC engines) laced with nitromethane would allow the spray to atomise in the compressor and make the whole thing more efficient. I guess the only way to find out is to buy one and try it out. Be ready for loud noises in North Wiltshire!!
Jack Aubrey is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 10:25
  #12 (permalink)  
Death Cruiser Flight Crew
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Vaucluse, France.
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Zoom: correct, the P&W J57 powered versions of the B52 and KC135 had water injection.

Seeing John Farley's comments of filling up from the fire engine causes the thought that you had to check that what was going in, was indeed water! (Paninternational BAC111-515 Hamburg 06/09/71, Jet A1 instead of de-min. water, 21 fatalities.)
Georgeablelovehowindia is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 13:36
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: London
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Trident 2 had water methanol fitted but it was removed. The problem was that the extra take off weight gained hardly exceeded the weight of the equipment and the water/meth.

As I recall the only indication was a green light twinkling away to show the system was working. The problem in a small engine would be getting the flow rate right.
Seat1APlease is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2006, 18:25
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: No one's home...
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zoom
Didn't KC-135s and B-52s with turbojets rather than turbofans use it as well? Otherwise even the earth's curvature wouldn't have got those beasts airborne.
The KC-135A with the J-57s did indeed use water when the temps were above 40F if I remember correctly. We carried 5600lbs of distilled water that you used in 120 seconds. It was timed by the nav on takeoff with a call when nearing water exhaustion to make sure you got the nose down.

When I first got into tankers the system was set up with LEFT and RIGHT water injection. Finally some wizard realized that with a little different plumbing, you would NOT have assymetric thrust if one of the pumps failed and they went to an INB and OUTB system. (well, DUH!) The injection pumps had a very high electrical load and at times you could not get the engines to 'take water' so various methods were used including running the engines up to about 2.00 EPR and then turning the water pumps on (helluva shock on the engines). 'wet' EPR for takeoff was 2.85.

A 'wet' takeoff was standard out of Thailand when carrying 165,000lbs of fuel for the fighters going north. Takeoff gross around 280 when added water and Vr speed around 170kts.
wileydog3 is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2006, 20:23
  #15 (permalink)  
ZFT
N4790P
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 73
Posts: 2,270
Received 25 Likes on 7 Posts
Interesting paper here that seems to indicate that water injection could again have a future.

http://www-psao.grc.nasa.gov/Library...er_7_20_04.pdf
ZFT is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2006, 21:35
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: LIRR
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, also the first versions of the B-707 equipped with the PW JT3 used the "wet" take off thrust procedure.
onehundred is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2006, 22:00
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They were referred to as "water wagons", IIRC

Maybe early DC-8's too?
barit1 is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2006, 01:42
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: CYZV
Age: 77
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I believe most RR Dart powered aircraft used water/methanol injection to either restore or boost engine power in hot/high operations. The RR Dart Mk529 was an example of a restored power engine while the Mk532 was a boosted engine. The Fairchild/Fokker F-27 series of aircraft as well as the Gulfstream G159 used water meth injection.

From the Fairchild manual:

The Fairchild F-27 aircraft is equipped with a water/methanol system which provides maximum engine power without exceeding allowable turbine gas temperature when high ambient temperature necessitates fuel trimming.

When operating at high power settings in high ambient temperatures, fuel flow must be trimmed to maintain engine temperature within acceptable limits. To restore the power lost by trimming, a controlled flow of water/methanol mixture is automatically injected to increase the mass flow through the engine. Although an increase in mass flow could be obtained by using water alone, this would not restore all the power lost by trimming since engine temperature would be lowered.

By adding methanol to the water, engine temperature is raised to the correct level which, in conjunction with the increased mass flow, restores power lost by trimming. Thus, at sea level, with temperatures above ISA, engine power is restored to the value that would be obtained under ISA conditions. At altitudes above sea level, power is restored not to it's sea level value, but to the value which would be obtained at the particular altitude under ISA conditions by automatically correcting for pressure altitude. Power restoration takes place up to an altitude of 10,000 feet.
Gulfstream says essentially the same thing

The correct mixture for the above is critical. It is 63% +/- 1% of water and 37% +/- 1% of methanol by volume. W/M is extremely corrosive, so if you have to handle it personal protective devices are essential.
pigboat is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2006, 01:35
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: No one's home...
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pigboat
I believe most RR Dart powered aircraft used water/methanol injection to either restore or boost engine power in hot/high operations. The RR Dart Mk529 was an example of a restored power engine while the Mk532 was a boosted engine. The Fairchild/Fokker F-27 series of aircraft as well as the Gulfstream G159 used water meth injection.
From the Fairchild manual:
Gulfstream says essentially the same thing
The correct mixture for the above is critical. It is 63% +/- 1% of water and 37% +/- 1% of methanol by volume. W/M is extremely corrosive, so if you have to handle it personal protective devices are essential.
The Nihon YS-11 which I flew used the Dart and indeed did use water injection.

Once you got the Dart started, you 'trimmed' it up with small toggle switches on the center console. You were provided with wet and dry data in the summer days. As part of your flight kit, since the YS-11 had such poor ventilation and air conditioning, you carried a small towel to wipe the sweat from your brow after a few flights But then (being parochial and partial to cold beer) it did make the afternoon brew even more enjoyable.
wileydog3 is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2006, 02:23
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brissvagas, Australia
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Hi all

We use water/meth injection on our Fairchild Metro 3 and 23's. All it does is help recover the lost power from low density air, ie Damm hot ! We use about 30 litres per takeoff on the 2 engines (TPE-331-12U) And the turbines love it ! I believe however the methanol is to stop the water freezing through the compressors and in the inlet when its extreamly cold.
bodex666 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.