Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th January 2006 | 11:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 100
From: Devon
Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

Recently I was looking into stuff to put on the Sea Jet thread, and found myself looking into things about the Type 45 Destroyer. Apart from the fact that the T45 is delayed, and has had the capabilities adjusted to help the MOD meet financial targets, there is a lot of information out there:

Richard Beedall's website has a section dedicated to the T45, the RN simply has one page, the DPA has a project fact file, and BAE Systems have a section on their website dedicated to the T45.

I suspect many of the technologies used with the T45 will also be used for CVF.

Now if you look at any of the pictures the flight deck seems quite large, certainly larger than a T42. Which brings me to the question:

Why is it only intended to carry a single Merlin?
WE Branch Fanatic is online now  
Old 10th January 2006 | 14:02
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: Angel N1
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

beadwindow out
Aeronut is offline  
Old 10th January 2006 | 14:04
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 100
From: Devon
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

Please see PM Aeronut...
WE Branch Fanatic is online now  
Old 10th January 2006 | 14:43
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 958
Likes: 55
From: Surrey, UK
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

Surely to carry a single FA2 for local air defence...

*gets coat*
steamchicken is offline  
Old 10th January 2006 | 15:11
  #5 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,490
Likes: 2
From: Between the woods and the water
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

So they can embark one of these, perhaps?



Gets coat, scarf, and tin hat.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 10th January 2006 | 15:22
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,682
Likes: 63
From: Far West Wessex
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

One of these and a BIG catapult...

LowObservable is offline  
Old 10th January 2006 | 19:29
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: UK
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

Don't you EVER give up WEBF???
AllTrimDoubt is offline  
Old 10th January 2006 | 19:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 1
From: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

LowObservable -

Well, you could go that route, but in the best traditions of the "Why do we always re-engineer our aircraft?" thread, you'd have to get BAES to stick Blue Vixen and four EJs in it. Why not start with a British design...





I/C
Ian Corrigible is offline  
Old 10th January 2006 | 20:13
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 100
From: Devon
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

Why can't the T45 have more than one helo?
WE Branch Fanatic is online now  
Old 10th January 2006 | 23:05
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

Went on deployment in an LPD with two wessex 5s and no hangar once. Just a hell of a lot of WD40!
doubledolphins is offline  
Old 11th January 2006 | 20:58
  #11 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: northside
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

You could get 2 Lynx on it no snags....but why would you want to put 2 Merlin on it? where would be the inprovement to OC there? What tactical advantage would it play??? Embark 2 Merlin on a T45 - Why ?
southside is offline  
Old 12th January 2006 | 02:58
  #12 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,682
Likes: 63
From: Far West Wessex
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

"Why not start with a British design"

Because it looks like a carp.
LowObservable is offline  
Old 12th January 2006 | 10:23
  #13 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,520
Likes: 7,257
From: Peripatetic
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

Itīs so thereīs enough room to fit the skyhook for the GR9........
ORAC is online now  
Old 12th January 2006 | 14:04
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 100
From: Devon
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

Might have a long weight for Skyhook......

Southside - surely two Merlin means more capability? As the Fleet gets smaller, carrying more helicopters will help recover some of the lost capability. One helicopters cannot be in two places at once, two of them can!

Talking of Merlin - see news about an upgrade.
WE Branch Fanatic is online now  
Old 12th January 2006 | 16:24
  #15 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: northside
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

surely two Merlin means more capability
Yeah...But remember this is the Merlin yr talking about. So, I'd plum for a couple of Larry's.
southside is offline  
Old 12th January 2006 | 16:44
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: UK
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

Larry Lynx any day! Soon it will be the only airborne asset belonging to the RN that will be able to fire a missile!
Jucky is offline  
Old 12th January 2006 | 20:40
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: uk
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

WEBF

You are a fool. Worse than that you are a persistent fool. Now in flight safety terms this means you are either a genius or just lucky to be alive. Discuss.
Mmm, put a Merlin on the T45. If we have one thats serviceable. Oh, and that doesn't have any anti-surface capability at all. Slinky Lynx every time.
Now, F*ck off.
pigfist is offline  
Old 12th January 2006 | 21:23
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 100
From: Devon
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

Polite as ever I see...

When/if the RN gets anti ship weapons put on the Merlin......also is there any planning for carrying Lynx/FLynx with the T45.
WE Branch Fanatic is online now  
Old 12th January 2006 | 21:41
  #19 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: northside
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation

also is there any planning for carrying Lynx/FLynx with the T45
BUGGER !!! I knew there was something we should have been thinking about. Give us credit For gawds sake. The aviation dept on a T45 has been planned down to the last rivet. An oppo of mine was in the T45IPT sitting on the Aviation desk and planning the Flight Dept years ago.
southside is offline  
Old 12th January 2006 | 23:39
  #20 (permalink)  
bad livin'
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation



YEAH!! Get THIS badboy on the T45. AND the CVS!!!!

How'd you like THEM apples, WEBF?
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.