LUTON - 5
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Uk
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Luton needs to be very careful about driving corporate aviation away,there,s not much value to be had out of a loco airliner full of low-net worth indivuals paying peanuts and not much in the way of airfield revenue other than what the punters spend in the shops.Gulfstream consider Cambridge or Southend which are not (and are unlikely to be) bunged up with the plague of the loco airlines.Your bespoke service to passengers of real worth can continue unabated and most probably with less hassle to your clients.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not so many places currently
Age: 60
Posts: 3,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This slot regulation has been public knowledge for quite a while now. It is just a fact of having an airfield below such a congested airspace. GA still operates out of LHR, LGW & STN. Harrods are investing more into Luton this year so at doesn't look like a major issue. It's life and just has to be worked with at a busy 24x7 airport.
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London Whipsnade Wildlife Park
Posts: 5,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was told that the new Zurich service was using an A319? How can this be true as Luton is not an Airbus base and the first departure is at 07:00, well before the domestic A319's arrive.
I doubt if executive flights needing slots will be too much of an issue especially as the airport is likely to suffer negative passenger growth for the next financial year.
If Wizz get to like Stansted, there might be even more slot availability?
I doubt if executive flights needing slots will be too much of an issue especially as the airport is likely to suffer negative passenger growth for the next financial year.
If Wizz get to like Stansted, there might be even more slot availability?
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North of 50N
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Luton needs to be very careful about driving corporate aviation away...Gulfstream consider Cambridge or Southend which are not (and are unlikely to be) bunged up with the plague of the loco airlines
Ebenezer
Southend is certainly H24/7 and, although only Category 1 ILS, has a far better Wx record than Luton which offsets that disadvantage somewhat.
There is rumour that NetJets are looking to set up a base at SEN, perhaps with engineering, so I don't think it's quite the non-starter that you suggest.
Southend is certainly H24/7 and, although only Category 1 ILS, has a far better Wx record than Luton which offsets that disadvantage somewhat.
There is rumour that NetJets are looking to set up a base at SEN, perhaps with engineering, so I don't think it's quite the non-starter that you suggest.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK Home Counties
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know that I am a bit daft, but what is the purpose of a 'voluntary' slot application?
There is rumour that NetJets are looking to set up a base at SEN, perhaps with engineering, so I don't think it's quite the non-starter that you suggest.
As for engineering, what's this got to do with the choice of destination that the punter wants to fly to?
I wasn't suggesting that the possibility of a NetJets engineering base at SEN has anything to do with "the choice of destination that the punter wants to fly to." They may simply be looking for an engineering base in the London area and would position aircraft to and from there. That would make sense surely.
By the way, I believe that NetJets do operate revenue sectors out of SEN at the moment so I don't believe that it being outside controlled airspace would be necessarily a negative factor.
By the way, I believe that NetJets do operate revenue sectors out of SEN at the moment so I don't believe that it being outside controlled airspace would be necessarily a negative factor.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: west london
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
>I know that I am a bit daft, but what is the purpose of a 'voluntary' slot application?
If indeed this is more to do with parking space then the slot may be to control the number of aircraft, not the operating time so much.
If indeed this is more to do with parking space then the slot may be to control the number of aircraft, not the operating time so much.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Based Aircraft for this summer
easyJet 17 x B737
Monarch 2 x A320, 2 x A321
Ryanair 4 x B738
Thomsonfly 2 x B757, 1 x B738
Silverjet 1x B762 (another 2 added later this year)
First Choice 1x A320
easyJet 17 x B737
Monarch 2 x A320, 2 x A321
Ryanair 4 x B738
Thomsonfly 2 x B757, 1 x B738
Silverjet 1x B762 (another 2 added later this year)
First Choice 1x A320
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK Home Counties
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Based Aircraft for this summer...
As expected, pax figures for Feb continued in the negative at 616,291.This was down 2.6% on Feb 2005. The fall however, was not as shocking as the 5% fall experienced in January but still makes for dismal reading.
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Boeing Team over l am told, Check will over run by about 5 weeks, so looks like it will be late.
Thread continued in: http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=269514
Thread continued in: http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=269514