Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

DARPA Pelican 2

Old 3rd Feb 2023, 19:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,231
Received 1,502 Likes on 679 Posts
DARPA Pelican 2

https://www.defensenews.com/air/2023...n-land-at-sea/

DARPA wants a heavy cargo plane that can land at sea

WASHINGTON — DARPA has tapped two companies to design, and possibly build, an experimental seaplane that can transport large amounts of cargo on the water.

General Atomics and Aurora Flight Sciences, a subsidiary of Boeing, will develop their own competing designs for DARPA’s mobility seaplane program, DARPA said Wednesday. DARPA has dubbed this program the Liberty Lifter Seaplane Wing-in-Ground Effect, or Liberty Lifter for short.

DARPA wants this aircraft to be a long-range, low-cost aircraft around the same size and capacity as the C-17 Globemaster, which can carry more than 170,000 pounds of cargo, including a 69-ton M1 Abrams main battle tank, armored vehicles, trucks or trailers…..

And DARPA has set some ambitious goals for the Liberty Lifter’s sea capabilities.

The seaplane DARPA envisions would be more robust than some of the Navy’s in-water capabilities. Small boats, for example, are typically limited to so-called sea state 3 conditions, where waves are about four feet high. But the Liberty Lifter would be required to take off and land in sea state 4, which sees waves of up to about eight feet.

At sea state 5, where waves are considered rough and reach 13 feet, these planes would still be asked to sustain operations. Sea state 5 is the point at which conditions start to threaten the Navy’s ability to conduct resupply missions at sea between auxiliary ships and warships.

The Liberty Lifter also should be capable of extended flight close to the water, DARPA said.….

The two companies vying to create the Liberty Lifter took markedly different approaches, according to concept art DARPA released.

Aurora Flight Sciences, which is working with marine engineering company Gibbs & Cox and marine vessel design company ReconCraft, designed a more traditional “flying boat” aircraft, as DARPA called it.

Aurora’s design has a single hull, high wings, wide horizontal stabilizers on its tail, and eight turboprops. Its wings would also angle down, though Aurora said they would not touch the water. Aurora said its plane would be able to carry two Marine Corps amphibious combat vehicles, or six 20-foot container units.

General Atomics, along with naval engineering and design firm Maritime Applied Physics, proposed a twin-hull, mid-wing design, which DARPA said is intended to optimize its stability on water. It would have 12 turboshaft propeller engines. The art also shows stabilizers on its dual noses.

Instead of loading or unloading cargo from an aft door and ramp, as is the case for the C-17, General Atomics’ concept art shows its plane’s noses lifting up and vehicles deploying directly from the front, down the ramps to a beach.

DARPA in November awarded General Atomics an $8 million cost-plus-fixed-fee contract for the Liberty Lifter program, and General Atomics said its award has the potential to grow to up to $29 million. Aurora’s contract, which DARPA awarded Jan. 27, was for $5.7 million, and could grow to more than $25 million if all options are exercised….

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_Pelican
ORAC is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 19:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,470
Received 2,595 Likes on 1,098 Posts
Yes they have put the Herc on a back burner, I was reading about the DARPA one yesterday, see a lot more

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...ected-by-darpa


Re the Herc

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...on-back-burner
NutLoose is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 20:18
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 192
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Well someone is going to make a lot of money designing something that really isn`t required and cannot be afforded and will never fly.
1771 DELETE is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 20:28
  #4 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,561
Received 402 Likes on 210 Posts
I think there’s a Caspian Sea Monster parked on a beach somewhere….
ShyTorque is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 23:42
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,267
Received 467 Likes on 191 Posts
Now what could possibly go wrong with such a program?

Plainly DARPA is looking to the Pacific again.....much as the US Military did back during WWII.

Is there a need for Sea Planes again?

Airports put an end to them after their Glory Days leading up to the War and the introduction of much cheaper and easier to build and operate Land Airplanes..

Perhaps the Hughes Spruce Goose can be dusted off as a hurry up Prototype.

https://www.usni.org/magazines/proce...n-sea-monsters



SASless is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2023, 08:07
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,254
Received 329 Likes on 194 Posts
"General Atomics and Aurora Flight Sciences, a subsidiary of Boeing, will develop their own competing designs for DARPA’s mobility seaplane program,

DARPA wants this aircraft to be a long-range, low-cost aircraft "

Those two sentences don't agree with each other........................
Asturias56 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 4th Feb 2023, 08:51
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 653
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Need to go back to some of the C-17 precursor programs and optimise for stol.

YC-14 - yes please.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_YC-14
unmanned_droid is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2023, 11:43
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glorious Devon
Posts: 2,628
Received 632 Likes on 371 Posts
One good thing about seaplanes - much harder to render the runway inoperable.
Ninthace is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2023, 12:07
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,231
Received 49 Likes on 18 Posts
When you see the words 'low cost' you just know it will be anything but.
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2023, 12:37
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,254
Received 329 Likes on 194 Posts
"And DARPA has set some ambitious goals "

Flee while there's still time.........................
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2023, 10:50
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 653
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Ninthace
One good thing about seaplanes - much harder to render the runway inoperable.
nature does that fairly well for the ocean, without human interaction
unmanned_droid is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.