![]() |
CPL Exam in VFR
Hello, this one for the examiners. Does the CPL Exam have to be carried out in VFR if not IMC or IFR rated and what are the procedures to follow if during an exam the conditions deteriorate below VFR (say outside controlled airspace and VIS is less than 5km below FL100). Does the student retake the exam or is it at the examiners discretion. Also, can you use the VOR in the exam to work out where you are or where you are going, heard that you could and all it means is that if you use it that you can be tested on it.
|
I am not an examiner but I am sure that the CPL is a VFR licence only (apart from the night privileges) and that the Skills Test MUST be taken in VFR conditions. It is up to the examinee to assess the weather as part of the flight planning process and make a pre-flight go/no go decision which, if completely bonkers, i.e. less than VFR conditions, could result in a fail! This would also apply to any decision to continue a flight into less than VFR conditions, the only exemption being a SVFR clearance through a CTR, if your examiner routed you via a CTR on the Nav section, provided that the SVFR minima were also rigidly applied.
I held an IMCR before the CPL Skills Test and was told in no uncertain terms that I was NOT permitted to exercise IMCR privileges during the test. The first phase of the Nav section is Mark 1 eyeball nav only. You can set up the Radio Nav kit for the diversion during the Nav section but you can't use it before then. You will be tested on Radio Nav aid tracking and position fixing. Keep it as simple as possible. |
Not an examiner, but a CPL instructor, so I hope my answers help. However, I should point out that the best person to speak to about these questions will be your CPL instructor, and if your CPL instructor says anything which contradicts what I write here, then take his word, not mine (or at least ask for further clarification from him).
Does the CPL Exam have to be carried out in VFR if not IMC or IFR rated what are the procedures to follow if during an exam the conditions deteriorate below VFR (say outside controlled airspace and VIS is less than 5km below FL100) First of all, you should make a sensible weather decision based on all the information available on the day. Hopefully, that will prevent you from encountering weather which is not VMC. However, we all know that forecasters get it wrong from time to time, and if you encounter deteriorating weather, you should take whatever action is appropriate before it becomes IMC, e.g. by making a diversion, or returning to your home airfield. What the examiner is looking for on the test is that you make exactly the same decisions as you would for any other flight. He wants to know that you will operate the aircraft safely when he is not sitting there, so you should not do anything different to what you would do on any other VFR flight. Make a weather decision based on the forecasts and actuals available. If you encounter deteriorating weather, turn back or divert before it becomes IMC. Does the student retake the exam or is it at the examiners discretion. (On the other hand, if you don't turn back, and you do encounter IMC, you have probably failed the en-route section of the test.) Also, can you use the VOR in the exam to work out where you are or where you are going, heard that you could and all it means is that if you use it that you can be tested on it FFF ---------------- |
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/SRG_FCL_03_A.PDF
The CPL Skill Test is a simulated public transport flight. You will be expected to operate in accordance with the procedures laid down in your company Operations Manual. Your FTO will teach you how to do this. |
Good Advice
Sage advice from flyingforfun.
I did my CPL recently (having amassed quite a few hours before taking the test) and you should plan the flight etc as you would NORMALLY do it. The examiner (who also instructed me in the CPL) explained that he was to act as a passenger and was to be treated as such. Therefore I checked the weather, area forecast etc and it was to be marginal at our destination. I advised him before the flight that we may have to divert or return to the field if weather conditions deteriorated. He agreed and off we went. I was quite prepared to come back or divert (as you always should be) in the event of weather. I can tell you that (as we talked after the flight test), had I continued into imc or near IMC to complete the flight, I would have failed. The main goal of the test is the safe and satisfactory conduct of the flight, the examiner wants to know that, should a real passenger come to you and ask to be taken point X, this will happen safely, and this includes avoiding IMC and diverting. I treated my examiner like a passenger so much, I even handed him a map and asked that he help with the navigation. He simply stared back at me stoney faced, but did smile a little. ;-) Dont try to pass, make saftey your priority and the rest will take care of itself. :) |
Flying for fun, I am curious. Where did you get the part about not tracking directly to a navaid from?
1) what if the Navaid is at your destination? 2) If you are position fixing, tracking along one radial whilst you check the cross cut is the most efficient way of doing so as that line is then fixed. PB:ok: |
PB, that's just what I'm teaching my students.
If possible, select and track one radial, not into CAS, D/R/P areas or towards high ground; use the second VOR/NDB for a cross cut, just ahead of your present position to give you time to settle down and 'mark' the map |
Pilotbear,
Whopity has posted the link to the Notes To Candidates document. Paragraph 3.6.7 states: The examiner will deny the use of any aid that would allow the applicant to track directly to the diversion destination. FFF -------------- |
Use of Naviads
During my test, after we had completed 10/15 mins of IF under the hood, (climbing decending turns etc), I was well and truly lost. I tuned the nav rad to a VOR well used in the area and was able to work out my position using DME and track. I was then given my diversion destination, to which of course there was no navaids. I certainly used a navaid to verify my position, this seemed quite acceptable. But there were no aids even close to my destinations in the test.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:02. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.