PPL +FI

[TheOddOne]

I knew someone with over 5,000 instructional hours who was still restricted. He specialised in teaching PPLs aerobatics, so never got to send ab initio students solo...

TOO

[Kemble Pitts]

FYI, there is a subsequent '(b)'

It would be better if the 'For LAPL(A) only' was next to the '(a)' but I (and others [inc. examiners]) believe that this is sloppy drafting rather than intentional.

[BillieBob]

On the contrary, the entry as written complies exactly with the regulation - instruction may be given only if the rating is to be applied to an LAPL(A).

[Whopity]

Is the reason for this paragraph that, even though they would have over 200 instructional hours, some CPL Instructors might still be Restricted?

No. This came in with JAR-FCL where a FI (Restricted) could give instruction on an Integrated Course at PPL level. ( there is no indication anywhere of which parts of a CPL course might be considered to be at PPL level) No requirement for 200 hours, because they are not teaching CPL. In the 20 years this has been in place, I have never encountered a FI(R) teaching in an Integrated school.

[Level Attitude]

[QUOTE=Kemble Pitts;10459073]
If Privilege (b) is included in the above - and it only applies to Ratings that can be attached to an LAPL - exactly which Class/Type Ratings can it be used with?