UK CAA rip-off fee for PPL examiner renewal
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Winchester
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
UK CAA rip-off fee for PPL examiner renewal
Looking ahead to the renewal of my PPL examiner certification, I have noted with horror that every 3 years not only do I need to attend a seminar (£160), fly with an examiner to check my competency (Fee ~ £200, aircraft hire ~£200), I then have to pay the CAA £338 to process the renewal application. This amount is the same as the initial application - and for what?
I wouldn't feel so begrudging if we as examiners got support from the Examiners Cell at Aviation House but when the EASA regulations came in, there was no guidance forthcoming. All we were told to do (by mass e mail) was to download a copy of the Examiners' Handbook which was already out of date! Furthermore, despite promises that it would be updated in 2013, surprise, surprise, it is now April 2014 and nothing has materialised. It really is a mystery as to what our 3 yearly fee is going towards.
I am not out to make money from examining ( a good thing too given the financial outlay) but to have to pay out a fee of £338 every 3 years to do a job that is actually is beneficial to the CAA - as they do not have to employ their own examiners - seems a bit of a kick in the proverbials. If I break even, I consider I am doing well.
Is there anyone out there who thinks it is time we challenged the size and frequency of the fee? I have already complained to the CAA but do not expect to get a coherent response. However, if there is any indication of support on this forum, I would be content to write to Andrew Haines, the CAA's CEO on behalf of us all.
I wouldn't feel so begrudging if we as examiners got support from the Examiners Cell at Aviation House but when the EASA regulations came in, there was no guidance forthcoming. All we were told to do (by mass e mail) was to download a copy of the Examiners' Handbook which was already out of date! Furthermore, despite promises that it would be updated in 2013, surprise, surprise, it is now April 2014 and nothing has materialised. It really is a mystery as to what our 3 yearly fee is going towards.
I am not out to make money from examining ( a good thing too given the financial outlay) but to have to pay out a fee of £338 every 3 years to do a job that is actually is beneficial to the CAA - as they do not have to employ their own examiners - seems a bit of a kick in the proverbials. If I break even, I consider I am doing well.
Is there anyone out there who thinks it is time we challenged the size and frequency of the fee? I have already complained to the CAA but do not expect to get a coherent response. However, if there is any indication of support on this forum, I would be content to write to Andrew Haines, the CAA's CEO on behalf of us all.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agree with you wholeheartedly
The CAA lost any credibility they may have had over the past year and most Examiners have seen what a joke the EASA transition was and how appallingly badly it was project managed and implemented. The CAA need to move from an "authority" to an administration and support our needs not create unnecessary red tape and cost so I wholeheartedly support your aim
It is amazing that so many professional pilots are unable to control the beast that is the CAA
It is amazing that so many professional pilots are unable to control the beast that is the CAA
Sadly, we will never get anywhere with this whilst there are people queuing up to be Examiners. It has long been the policy of the CAA to get people to pay them for the'privilege' of doing their job for them wherever possible.
MJ
MJ
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 55N
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Examiner Auth renewal by experience
It would ameliorate the situation if the FE re-authorisation was changed so that it could be done on experience on alternate revalidations - much the same as the FI revals. Certainly the re-issue fee is unjustifiably high and this, together with the above proposal, would be worth a try ( well..I live in hope!)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ...back of the drag curve
Age: 61
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, write directly to Andrew Haines. He's currently bending over backwards to please Grant Shapps MP (who is an aircraft owner & PPL, although flying an N reg Saratoga) with a 'Red Tape Challenge' for GA. Licensing is included.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you think that's bad, I have to renew an FE and CRE and the CRE renewal is £1600 every 3 years plus the aircraft and has to be done with a staff examiner. At least my R and GRE get renewed in the same fee as the FE.....
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Examiner glut?
Sadly, we will never get anywhere with this whilst there are people queuing up to be Examiners
Well, that may be so in your part of the World...
I had thought about progressing to become an examiner (1,500 hr instructional, 7 years) though I think my experience marginal at best. Apparently, in the past, at my stage of development, one rang the CAA and said 'I've got 1,500 hours instructional and would like to become an examiner' and they sent back your approval in the post. Now, I'd have to do a seminar, an additional 2 days TK and practical, then a flight test or two with a CAA examiner. I reckon it would cost me over £1,500. With our current level of students and revals, I don't think I'd be able to stand the loss I'd make over the next 3 years - that's always assuming I'd pass, of course.
Personally, I think 1500 hrs is right on the bottom edge of experience for examining. As a reference, the CAA think that 250 hours is adequate! How does that work? There must be some hot-shot instructors out there who can examine after 250 hrs experience.
The Odd One
Well, that may be so in your part of the World...
I had thought about progressing to become an examiner (1,500 hr instructional, 7 years) though I think my experience marginal at best. Apparently, in the past, at my stage of development, one rang the CAA and said 'I've got 1,500 hours instructional and would like to become an examiner' and they sent back your approval in the post. Now, I'd have to do a seminar, an additional 2 days TK and practical, then a flight test or two with a CAA examiner. I reckon it would cost me over £1,500. With our current level of students and revals, I don't think I'd be able to stand the loss I'd make over the next 3 years - that's always assuming I'd pass, of course.
Personally, I think 1500 hrs is right on the bottom edge of experience for examining. As a reference, the CAA think that 250 hours is adequate! How does that work? There must be some hot-shot instructors out there who can examine after 250 hrs experience.
The Odd One
Apparently, in the past, at my stage of development, one rang the CAA and said 'I've got 1,500 hours instructional and would like to become an examiner' and they sent back your approval in the post.
the CAA think that 250 hours is adequate! How does that work?
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Almost, it was actually AOPA you rang and you needed the endorsement of a club/school.
No need for a school/club endorsement for FE (was needed for GE) application but it did sometimes help overcome rejections based on geography.
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...the CAA have no say in the matter.
ifitaint...
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I became an examiner in 1997. Just phoned the CAA, they checked their records, said thats ok, paid the fee and they sent back the forms and handbook.
Read the relavant parts in the handbook and conducted tests.
No problems.
I used my 20 years of flying and 10 years instructing to make my judgements.
I think 5000 hrs instructing should be a minimum.
So now i have to attend some seminar where i pay, to be told information that should come to me direct in paper form from the CAA.
Last seminar i went to just came away with a stinking cold and lost a total of 3 days income!
Read the relavant parts in the handbook and conducted tests.
No problems.
I used my 20 years of flying and 10 years instructing to make my judgements.
I think 5000 hrs instructing should be a minimum.
So now i have to attend some seminar where i pay, to be told information that should come to me direct in paper form from the CAA.
Last seminar i went to just came away with a stinking cold and lost a total of 3 days income!
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Blackpool/Carlisle
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am currently part way through my efforts to become an examiner.
I sent off my initial application to the CAA which was approx £360 to which i then received a letter saying that i could go on the course.
The course cost £400 plus a flight so around £560 .
I have now been allocated a senior examiner, his fee £400.
On top of this there will be the aircraft costs for the test, that should if i am successful make the amount spent around £1700-1800 , i dare not think what the CAA will charge to then issue said piece of paper.
Had i have known it was going to cost this much i doubt i would have started it.
I sent off my initial application to the CAA which was approx £360 to which i then received a letter saying that i could go on the course.
The course cost £400 plus a flight so around £560 .
I have now been allocated a senior examiner, his fee £400.
On top of this there will be the aircraft costs for the test, that should if i am successful make the amount spent around £1700-1800 , i dare not think what the CAA will charge to then issue said piece of paper.
Had i have known it was going to cost this much i doubt i would have started it.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Not sure anymore….
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i dare not think what the CAA will charge to then issue said piece of paper.
Hughcant
Notwithstanding my previous post, I fully support your efforts, and await the CAA response with interest.
The policy on appointment of PPL Examiners has varied over the years from being very restrictive, only having enough Examiners in any area to cover the number of tests required, to the recent more liberal attitude of allowing anyone who wants to be, to become an Examiner.
The problem we have now is that there are more examiners in most parts of the country than there are tests to do, and the result is that most of the tests are carried out by the Examiners who are perceived to be the 'least stringent'.
Dare I suggest that the CAA may be 'gold plating' the new EASA requirements with the intention of reducing the total number of Examiners, increaing revenue, and creating work for their erstwhile colleagues?
Oh, did I just say that out loud?
Wash my mouth out with carbolic soap!
MJ
Notwithstanding my previous post, I fully support your efforts, and await the CAA response with interest.
The policy on appointment of PPL Examiners has varied over the years from being very restrictive, only having enough Examiners in any area to cover the number of tests required, to the recent more liberal attitude of allowing anyone who wants to be, to become an Examiner.
The problem we have now is that there are more examiners in most parts of the country than there are tests to do, and the result is that most of the tests are carried out by the Examiners who are perceived to be the 'least stringent'.
Dare I suggest that the CAA may be 'gold plating' the new EASA requirements with the intention of reducing the total number of Examiners, increaing revenue, and creating work for their erstwhile colleagues?
Oh, did I just say that out loud?
Wash my mouth out with carbolic soap!
MJ
Last edited by Mach Jump; 23rd Apr 2014 at 21:26. Reason: Spelling
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The course cost £400 plus a flight so around £560 .
ifitaint...
the course should now have at least two flights - see Standards Document 21.
AMC1 FCL.1015
(b) The course should last:
(1) for the FE and FIE, at least 1 day, divided into theoretical and practical training;
(2) for other examiners, at least 3 days, divided into theoretical training (1 day) and practical training in an FFS conducting role played proficiency checks and skill tests (at least 2 days).
(b) The course should last:
(1) for the FE and FIE, at least 1 day, divided into theoretical and practical training;
(2) for other examiners, at least 3 days, divided into theoretical training (1 day) and practical training in an FFS conducting role played proficiency checks and skill tests (at least 2 days).
(5) For an initial examiner certificate, practical training should include the examination of the test profile sought, consisting of the conduct of at least two test or check profiles in the role of examiner (these two tests or checks profiles can be performed in the same simulator session),