Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

FI(R) without CPL?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jan 2014, 16:52
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ireland
Age: 32
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So once you have a CPL you can earn money by teaching the PPL?

Also i see in the States that they do a single engine CPLand a multi engine CPL? If you were to do a SINGLE ENGINE CPL would that still qualify you for the flight instructors course?
Gally2 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2014, 17:04
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Northern Europe
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It used to be like that in Europe, but now you can earn money instructing without being a CPL.
AirborneAgain is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2014, 17:44
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ireland
Age: 32
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can you actually make a living from being a flight instructor ? Is it good yearly salary . I presume not
Gally2 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2014, 18:26
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can you actually make a living from being a flight instructor ?
No. Unfortunately the market is in a state where there are plenty of instructors willing to work for very little money, so flying schools have all the power.

Almost every PPL school in the country (certainly all the ones I have dealt with) keep their instructors on a self employed basis, effectively as contractors, so they only get paid when they fly. A typical hourly rate is about £20 per flying hour, and overall in the UK you'd be luck to average 40-50 hours a month, maybe 60 as a high average.

So you'll be earning around £1000-£1200 a month, if you're lucky, but that could be £300 one month and £2000 another, there's no consistency, and certainly no salary.
RTN11 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2014, 21:01
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Northern Europe
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A typical hourly rate [in the UK]is about £20 per flying hour
How much do the students pay?
AirborneAgain is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2014, 21:14
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ireland
Age: 32
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Really??? That is a shame!! It would be a nice job but i suppose just not financially worthwhile. Is there any job you can get from getting a PPL, ATPL and CPL (maybe IR added in to that)? I know you would not have the amount of ratings the airlines require to hire people but is there anything else?
Gally2 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2014, 22:09
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: england
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have been instructing on a ppl licence since 1999 and been paid all the hours, the old system allowed ppl's to become instructors. From memory I think you needed 400 hours to get on the instructor course and the CPL course at the time was only 150 hours

From my understanding it reverting back to this under EASA I maybe wrong though
cyclic flare is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2014, 23:51
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,198
Received 133 Likes on 60 Posts
Tobster911

Whether or not you can teach with a PPL is a legal question. Since I am not very familiar with the way things get done across the pond I can't answer that question.

What I can comment on as a long time instructor including completing many instructor ratings, is that the average fresh from the flight test CPL does, in general, not have a high enough level of flying skill to properly demonstrate any manoever and the first part of the course is invariably used to raise the students flying skills to an acceptable level.

I have never flown with a low hour PPL that was any near the skill level required to instruct. If you do intend to progress towards a flight instructor rating I would suggest it would be prudent to budget for a significant amount of addition dual to raise your skills to the necessary level.
Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2014, 09:32
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
the average fresh from the flight test CPL does, in general, not have a high enough level of flying skill to properly demonstrate any manoever
I would agree with this observation. Usually, a PPL holder with 300 hours is far more suited to a FI Course than a freshly minted CPL holder. Hour building (wasting) is no substitute for real experience gained by a PPL who is not set on meeting an hours target.

How many car drivers, lorry drivers or motorcycle riders pass their test and rush off to become instructors?
Whopity is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2014, 22:15
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a slight variance on the thread. My understanding is, If I complete a FI course without sitting the CPL written's I can only instruct for the LAPL. After a period of time, if I then subsequently pass the CPL written's can I then start instructing for the full PPL without any further training. Many thanks.
IMC1 is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2014, 06:33
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Northern Europe
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
After a period of time, if I then subsequently pass the CPL written's can I then start instructing for the full PPL without any further training
From the way FCL.915.FI is worded, it does appear so, but it is not crystal clear. It says that when you apply for an FI(A) as a PPL(A), you should meet "the requirements for CPL theoretical knowledge, except for an FI(A) providing training for the LAPL(A) only".

This suggests that if you subsequently pass the CPL written, you don't need additional training, but you do need to re-apply for the FI(A) certificate.

Check with your national authority!
AirborneAgain is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2014, 08:15
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From the way FCL.915.FI is worded, it does appear so, but it is not crystal clear. It says that when you apply for an FI(A) as a PPL(A), you should meet "the requirements for CPL theoretical knowledge, except for an FI(A) providing training for the LAPL(A) only".
When the FI(A) rating is added to the licence there should in theory be an entry in the remarks column stating that the rating is restricted to giving instruction for the LAPL. Whether or not that is there in practice is another matter. There is no reason why a FI(A) with no CPL theory should not teach for class or type ratings as they have met all the requirements for the issue of a CRI rating! Perhaps you should obtain that at the same time!
Whopity is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2014, 09:36
  #33 (permalink)  
GgW
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Not sure anymore….
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How will the CAA, make sure that PPL holder without cpl knowledge and a FI Rating only instruct towards/for the LAPL. Where is the cutoff point going to be in the syllabus. Because you can do all the traing with a DVLA medical and then just before the test change over to a class 2 or LAPL medical.
GgW is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2014, 14:14
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
How will the CAA, make sure that PPL holder without cpl knowledge and a FI Rating only instruct towards/for the LAPL
That is the ATOs responsibility. The CAA only need to look at the licence application and any instruction given by an unqualified FI would be rejected. Quite simple really. The knock on effect is that ATOs would become reluctant to use LAPL FIs.
Whopity is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.