Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

PPL Written Exams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th May 2013, 10:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PPL Written Exams

This may have already been covered.
I've just had a look at the new PPL written exams. I'm shocked and horrified. Who the hell wrote them? The navigation exam no longer requires the use of a chart. There's no planning. A lot of the questions don't have anything to do with PPL training/flying. This exam in particular must have been written by somebody with no knowledge of aviation training.
I don't know what to say. I'm shocked at the way that things are going.
Esperanza is offline  
Old 28th May 2013, 12:41
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,803
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
If you are an AOPA member, please send your views to the AOPA office, marked 'for attention of the Instructor Committee'.

Thanks.
BEagle is online now  
Old 28th May 2013, 14:03
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not, but by the looks of things I should be.
I have a really horrible feeling about where all of this is heading. I've been teaching for over twenty years, and recently I was offered a job in another industry. I'm starting to think that I should have taken it.
Esperanza is offline  
Old 28th May 2013, 14:28
  #4 (permalink)  

PPRuNe FirstOfficer
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So in short, the old exam papers were useless and the new ones not much better either, I guess we can always wait another 50 years when things change again...
FirstOfficer is offline  
Old 28th May 2013, 15:09
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've written to AOPA.
Esperanza is offline  
Old 28th May 2013, 15:49
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,803
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Thanks, Esperenza!
BEagle is online now  
Old 28th May 2013, 19:56
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
One year ago Flightcrew Standards issued an IN No 2012-094 regarding Navigation standards and the training expected. Perhaps someone should send them a copy of their own exams!
Whopity is offline  
Old 29th May 2013, 06:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,803
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
I mentioned to a senior CAA Examiner that many of the so-called 'MDR' techniques mentioned in the IN weren't actually 'MDR' at all. The response? "Trust you to spot that!".....
BEagle is online now  
Old 31st May 2013, 20:27
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: York
Age: 53
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've just had a look at the Nav questions and I can't believe there content.

I know the CAA claim to have discussed the new PPL exams with industry but I have no idea which industry they discussed them with because for love or money I can't see the relevance of their content to PPL navigational training.

I would therefore urge everyone to have a read of them and pass their comments either good or bad to AOPA.

Last edited by Mickey Kaye; 31st May 2013 at 20:29.
Mickey Kaye is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2013, 06:27
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The removal of the Navigation Chart is probably down to ergonomics and cost. The CAA no longer has a stock of charts, and nobody retains out of date charts, they are destroyed to avoid payment of OS licensing charges. In the absence of any training analysis, who is to say what is relevant? The EASA syllabus is so vague it quantifies nothing!
The quality of the new PPL exams is not much different from the quality of the new professional exams which are also produced by people with no relevant experience.

Whopity is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.