Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Reload this Page >

UAS Hours counting towards PPL

Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

UAS Hours counting towards PPL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Feb 2012, 08:14
  #21 (permalink)  
blagger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
As long as the flying is certified as correct by the OC UAS I've never know it being a problem not having the take off and landing times.
 
Old 27th Feb 2012, 10:06
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: England
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far as I know recording the "start finish times" are not actually mandatory.
However, my Service logbook is based on time in the air. In the civvy world hours recorded are essentially based upon brakes off to brakes on time. See LASORS for the strict definition. Therefore you can as I understand it revise your UAS hours to reflect this taxi time.

Notwithstanding this, it is still the case that whatever "credits" you have on paper you need to demonstrate the level of skill/experience to pass the GST.

I didn't have to claim "hours credit" as such towards my NPPL as I am an exQSP but if you want the latest info on Service/civvy log book comparisons try the CAA themselves or try a post on the Military Aircrew part of Pprune.
Fake Sealion is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2012, 15:49
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Up North
Age: 57
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personal flying log book
Article 79.........
....(3) The information recorded in accordance with paragraph (2) must include:
(a) the date, the places at which the holder of the log book embarked on and
disembarked from the aircraft and the time spent during the course of a flight when the holder was acting in either capacity......
From the ANO, no actual need to log brakes off/on times, although very common to see columns for this many logbooks.
mrmum is offline  
Old 29th Feb 2012, 20:15
  #24 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: UK SE
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for all your input,

Correct there is not T/O and Land column in the orange book i've got.. Thinking I should 'be safe than sorry' maybe.
AOJM is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2012, 07:01
  #25 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,216
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
It is normal practice to record brakes off and brakes on times in civil logbooks, but not - in the UK at least, legally required. It's also worth remembering that whilst the military log take off to landing, civil flying logs brakes off to brakes on, which is longer.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2012, 07:53
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,805
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
The simplest solution is to buy a civil logbook. Then:

Record flight time in the civil log book under civil rules
Record flight time in the UAS school exercise book under military rules

And fill in the logbook every evening! UAS students were notoriously bad at logging flights - I certainly was when I was a student! But there's so little flying these days that there really should be no excuse.
BEagle is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2012, 11:35
  #27 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: UK SE
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The rule i've heard is that for every military hour you can add 10 mins when coverting to civvi hours.

Although I prefer the idea of logging in two seperate books with two seperate rules as i've had to wait at the hold for over 30 mins before.. would of counted in civvi terms.. hehe
AOJM is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2012, 14:17
  #28 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,216
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by AOJM
The rule i've heard is that for every military hour you can add 10 mins when coverting to civvi hours.

Although I prefer the idea of logging in two seperate books with two seperate rules as i've had to wait at the hold for over 30 mins before.. would of counted in civvi terms.. hehe
I agree. I've heard the 10 minute figure as well, but accuracy seems so much more sensible!

There are plenty of different civil logbooks to choose from - personally I'd recommend either the CAA's CAP 407, or Pooley's professional logbook, both easily compatible with Military logbooks.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2012, 17:11
  #29 (permalink)  
blagger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The taxi time allowance stuff is in LASORS Section A Appendix B, but it states in there it won't be accepted towards licence issue requirements. I strongly advise take up BEagles advice of running a parallel civvy logbook with chocks times in.
 
Old 6th Sep 2012, 15:34
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: London
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can anyone confirm yet whether "exemptions" means being disallowed hours completely? All of the supporting documents are fairly ambiguous, I'm just looking for a definite yes/no.
flyingcyclist is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2019, 18:15
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Bristol
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm in the same situation

I'm in almost the same situation, including hours and dates. I sent you a message but I'm still a probationary person so no inbox.

Did you solve your problem and get your licence?
David Balfour is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2019, 12:24
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 754
Received 19 Likes on 6 Posts
Unfortunately and rather scandalously UAS hours count for precisely zero credit towards an EASA ppl. My son has found this out the hard way. Previously it was possible to credit some hours towards an lapl. Not anymore. My son acquired 95 hours over 5 years at UAS. Now on the modular route to an atpl with no credit. Go figure. Coupled with vat on flight training this is nothing short of ridiculous.
olster is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2019, 15:29
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The wonders of half baked Europrean bureaurcracy.
Whopity is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2019, 16:42
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 754
Received 19 Likes on 6 Posts
Indeed, whopity. I have tried to raise this with Balpa and zero interest generated. When apparently a pilot shortage, known barriers to flight training due expense, the UAS system is vetoed for no apparent reason. The trainees are uni students, selected, trained by current Air Force QFIs, aerobatics, solo etc and their flight time counts for foxtrot alpha. Unbelievable really.
olster is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2019, 18:33
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: hayling island
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well at least they have nice experience's to look back on in the mobile phone pictures etc
timprice is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2019, 18:33
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
One way is to go to the USA and do a FAA PPL where you will get credits, then convert to EASA.
Whopity is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2019, 19:03
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tomsk, Russia
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Or Canada which has a more aligned syllabus, considerably less bureaucracy and lower prices and fees.
selfin is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2019, 18:02
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Amblesidel
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What happens if the UAS instructor happens to be a civilian UK or EASA FI, the aircraft is UK registered, can the instruction then not be counted?
anchorhold is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2019, 23:14
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
No, because it was not conducted in accordance with the regulation. Needs an ATO or RTF to be valid. Even JAA training conducted at a RTF or ATO is no longer valid.
Whopity is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2019, 11:25
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 754
Received 19 Likes on 6 Posts
Unfortunately you are spot on, Whopity. Makes no sense but there you go.
olster is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.