Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

Liberty XL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Dec 2010, 15:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: York
Age: 53
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Liberty XL

Anybody have any recent experience how this aircraft has been holding up in the training environment?
Mickey Kaye is offline  
Old 28th Dec 2010, 11:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Did they ever solve the problem with the stiction that affected the elevator forces? One large Florida operator grounded the fleet and they were sitting around the field with the wings off. I note their current ads do not show any Liberty XLs! And they are just down the road from where they are made.
Whopity is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 08:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle
Age: 39
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I flew them at the large Florida based school who did have them for a short while. Great visibility but shocking initial climbout which wasn't the greatest when you were flying from an airport with large trees at the end of every runway and a 2000 ft density altitude. The C150 seemed to perform better on the initial climb out.

It was great for cross country flights due to the vis but I felt the FADEC took away a lot of the learning processes involved in getting to grips with carb heat and mixture.

The problems from what I've heard (purely anecdotal) are due to the landing gear strength. The stick control system is a lot more fiddlier than your traditional control column and it was sometimes difficult to get back to earth without a rather large bump.

If you check on NTSB.gov and look at the incidents at KOMN, three of the entries in the last 5 years involved said aircraft type, two of them list improper go around technique as a probable cause and one of them due to a hard landing. The aircraft was withdrawn soon after the third incident.

So in all, good as a tourer but personally it is my opinion that there are better training aircraft out there.
geordiejet is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 15:35
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The stick control system is a lot more fiddlier than your traditional control column and it was sometimes difficult to get back to earth without a rather large bump.
There was an issue with the elevator bearing which could require up to 2 pounds of stick force to move it. As the control forces continually varied, anyone trying to fly it by feel rather than attitude, came down with a bump! Plus the finger brakes and slender undercarriage. I test flew one with the Liberty rep and concluded it was not as forgiving as a 152.
Whopity is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2011, 09:38
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle
Age: 39
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah the finger brakes. Forgot about them. They were bloody awful. I remember hearing about plans to change this to a more conventional braking system so the newer models may have toe brakes installed. Not entirely sure though.
geordiejet is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.