Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

Pilot Navigation

Old 12th Nov 2009, 15:14
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Up front
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Set Heading Procedures: Take time, turn onto correct heading, check correct general direction, align DI and Compass, check fuel, ETA, Radio call...

Then at checkpoints chosen as distances gone that divide into 60 (remember the 1 in 60 rule 1 Nm off in 60 Nm is 1 deg off track) So 15, 20, 30. At 15 put times 4 on the map, at 20 times 3 and at 30 times 2.

You arrive at the 20 Nm checkpoint in 13 minutes elapsed and pinpoint yourself as 3 Nm left of track - so multiply by 3 and you are tracking 9 deg left. Turn 18 deg right for 13 min to regain track (double drift) then left 9 deg to mantain a heading corrected for the drift experienced on the first 13 min.

Worked for years at low level in harvards etc so have fun....
groundfloor is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2018, 20:03
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: UK
Age: 24
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello,
​​​​​​Here's a question out of the blue on this thread. Was not sure where to post it.

On a navigation computer (CRP5) finding GS and TRK, when the wind mark (i.e. the drift) ends up Port or Starboard of the centerline, when do you add or subtract this number from your HDG?

Please also if anyone can recommend a website or youtube channel which teaches UK PPL nav I would be be so grateful. I've had to put my practical PPL training on hold for the past 4 months to try and learn navigation and pass the exam but being hopeless at maths I am finding it (the CRP5 stuff in particular) extremely difficult to understand!

Thank you
Wannabe1999 is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2018, 20:16
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Sounds to me that rather than asking lots of questions and getting a range of answers, you should go to your club and get your instructor to show you. It is far easier to learn from a demonstration than trying to teach yourself, especially when you are not sure what you need to learn in the first place.
Whopity is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2018, 20:38
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Lurking within the psyche of Dave Sawdon
Posts: 771
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Wannabe1999
Hello,
On a navigation computer (CRP5) finding GS and TRK, when the wind mark (i.e. the drift) ends up Port or Starboard of the centerline, when do you add or subtract this number from your HDG?
Please also if anyone can recommend a website or youtube channel which teaches UK PPL nav I would be be so grateful. I've had to put my practical PPL training on hold for the past 4 months to try and learn navigation and pass the exam but being hopeless at maths I am finding it (the CRP5 stuff in particular) extremely difficult to understand!
To answer your first question: always draw a sketch of the situation before you start. By doing this you will know which side the wind is from and whether it's ahead or behind, rather than just treating the numbers as a mathematical puzzle.
The wizz wheel is a brilliant tool and it's worth investing some time with an instructor who really understands all its foibles (preferably an FI who grew-up with linear slide rules or log tables). There are several people around the UK (including me!) who offer 1:1 groundschool on any aspects of the syllabus - whereabouts are you?

HFD
hugh flung_dung is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2018, 21:56
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: UK
Age: 24
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the responses.

Indeed, "ask a FI at your club for ground school" would be the best thing to do.

Problem is things went a bit sour between me and my school, who charged £50+ ph for theory sessions anyway, so I thought I'd be able to self study Nav and then finish off the flying bit at a different school. There are only 2 schools here who teach PPL. I asked a ground school provider in the area about lessons but they could not accommodate me.

(By the way, my school insisted I couldn't start practical navigation until I'd passed the ground exam...... oh and "no starting navigation until you've gone solo"...... Does this seem unreasonable?)

I'm unsure if this new school would accept me for theory lessons when I'm not officially a 'student' flying there yet, but I must ask them.

No doubt it's better to spend a few ££s on a few hours of formal tuition, rather than bang my head against the wall trying to teach myself something I know nothing about just from the books and an array of different methods demonstrated over the internet (many incorrect!). This would take months with my flying skills getting more and more rusty meanwhile, eventually requiring more practical lessons at £250ph

Haha and there was me planning on an ATPL distance learning course in future....!

HFD, must stay anonymous on here but I'm in the south of England and the school prices stated may give you a clue of the airport. If you're anywhere nearby feel free to PM me with more details.

You can’t use the Private Messaging system, add url links or images until you have an established posting history.
Wannabe1999 is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2018, 22:27
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wherever I lay my hat
Posts: 3,975
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
I learned using the SCA method, then i switched to helicopters and discovered drift lines, which make everything 200% easier!

In a nutshell:
1 Draw your track line, then draw a dotted line 10° either side.
2 Pick a prominent feature somewhere before half way.
3 When you get there, use the track lines to assess your drift (rarely more than 5-6° unless the winds are completely wrong)
4 Now hold that error until the half way point (or half way time)
5 At the half way point, correct using Double the drift. (If you're 4° left, steer 8° right. 4° to get you parallel and 4° to correct you back again.

The further along track your 'drift fix' is, the more accurate, and you can of course alter the maths to suit (so if you assess drift and turn at ⅔ point for example, you would apply drift plus double drift)

Other than that, the biggest cock up will happen if you take off planning to turn left and atc tell you to turn right, immediately f*cking up your day and giving you monkey-brain, so take off and get yourself to a prominent feature close by and draw the line from there. That way you can start the clock and the right time, facing the right way at the right speed.
rudestuff is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2018, 08:06
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Wannabee1999
when do you add or subtract this number from your HDG?
Just think about it. You don't, you add or subtract if from the Track to find your Heading. All headings and tracks are measured clockwise from Nortrh. If the drift is left The track will be left of the Heading so if you want to stay on Track, you must increase the Heading. Put simply, you must turn the Heading towards the wind to maintain the Track.
Whopity is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2018, 11:30
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Lurking within the psyche of Dave Sawdon
Posts: 771
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Wannabe1999
Don't worry about a school not accepting you for theory - they're all businesses so will take money from anyone. The problem is more that many FIs seem to either dislike giving ground school or may not have the necessary depth of knowledge or academic rigour to do it well. That's why I suggested trying to find someone who's been around for a while, who understands the subjects rather than just parrots what they have learned, and who enjoys teaching.

I'm no longer "darn sarf". I operated, primarily, around Hampshire and Wiltshire for many years but have moved to beautiful, rural and relaxed, Herefordshire. People come here for semi-residential ground school and PPL exams so let me know if you fancy spending a day or two going through some of the subjects. Getting a full understanding of both sides of the wizz wheel won't take long and may make you a convert for life ;-)

HFD
hugh flung_dung is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2018, 07:29
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: England
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by funfly
On a clear day, select something you can see in the direction you want to go and fly towards it. (as long as it's not another aircraft!) - it's what you do when you spot the airfield in the distance anyway!
And that's why novices end up feature crawling and either getting lost or landing at the wrong airport.
Capt Pit Bull is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2018, 07:50
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
And that's why novices end up feature crawling and either getting lost or landing at the wrong airport.
Precisely. I recall a candidate who had to retake the Nav section of the Skill Tests. We passed over the first turning point before embarking upon a series of manoeuvres resembling a square search and finally attacking the turning point from about 90 degrees to the original track. When he finally anounced that this was his turning point, I asked why wasn't it the first time he passed over it? Had he flown Heading and Time, he would have passed his test, as it was, having failed the second attempt, he now had to retake the entire Skill Test.
Whopity is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2018, 18:13
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Temporarily Unsure!
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Whopity
Sounds to me that rather than asking lots of questions and getting a range of answers, you should go to your club and get your instructor to show you. It is far easier to learn from a demonstration than trying to teach yourself, especially when you are not sure what you need to learn in the first place.
Sound advice. The little book that comes with the CRP5 is very good. I am always amazed at the number of students that have never looked at it.

Take Whopity's advice though.
rarelyathome is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2018, 14:10
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What's the view of the RINs method of VFR navigation, ie remaining 'on track' without deviating/getting back on track (I believe based on military helicopter navigation)?
Parson is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2018, 21:31
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
ie remaining 'on track' without deviating/getting back on track
That is the ultimate objective and requires frequent small adjustments to maintain track, but what happens when you inadvertantly find you are some way off track? I have seen Tornado pilots fly the wrong heading and finish up a long way off track and Navy senior helicopter Navigator pick the wrong turning point because he was continuously map reading and got it wrong.
Whopity is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2018, 06:41
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Whopity - I haven't tried it (yet - I do plan to) but, on the face of it, it seems straightforward. Approaching a new leg, you initially turn onto track (not wind corrected heading), pick a point in the distance that is on your projected track and fly whatever heading is needed to maintain it, ie finding out what you wind corrected heading is based on actual wind, not forecast. It does strike me as close to 'track crawling' though and I note your point about what happens if you find yourself off track. Interesting that what RIN is promoting is not consistent with PPL training. I was just wondering if anywhere teaches this method.
Parson is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2018, 07:56
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,795
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Parson, are you referring to the 'technique' included in that 'Infringement Avoidance by enhanced navigation' leaflet peddled by RIN at AeroExpo?

I showed it to the CAA and GASCo - both had significant concerns. For example, the RIN 'Lost' procedure is anachronistic and they've made no mention of 'Squawk 0030'. I also doubt RIN's wisdom of so-called CRM in single pilot operations - "Ask any additional crew or passengers to hold the chart, read out the next track and drift details and manage the stopwatches. After the TP, they can carry out the 'F-I-R' part of the checks out loud and set up any radio changes". Nope - those are PIC tasks!!

As I used to tell my students, navigation cannot be difficult if navigators can do it!

Stick to simplicity, learn the Standard Closing Angle technique, do your FREDA checks at quiet times (NOT at turning points) fly heading and time between waypoints and above all LOOKOUT - particularly for screen-gazers bumbling along who may not be looking where they're going.
BEagle is online now  
Old 19th Jul 2018, 09:49
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Interesting that what RIN is promoting is not consistent with PPL training.
I though that the upper speed for the RIN was about 18 Kts! On C130s you turned onto track, looked at the drift meter then applied it.
Maintaing track is all down to experience and the PPL trainee does not have it, so they must be taught how to recognise where they are in relation to track and what the options are for correcting. In my experience a young pilot will fly an accurate heading and height but fails to recognise when its not working. The older pilot may fly less accurately but seems to have more situational awareness (experience of life). Once they are uncertain they panic, look at the map and jump to irrational conclusions, because they are not using the clock.
Whopity is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2018, 09:51
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
BEagle - yes, I had read about this technique and then attended a lecture by an ex-RAF navigator at AeroExpo. I wasn't recommending it, just wondering what the general view of it was. Also why RIN was promoting something that differed so much from PPL DR. For the record, I also thought the RIN 'typical VFR chart' had way too much info added to it.
Parson is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.